【正文】
R may create monetary value for panies at least when they are prosecuted for largest firms in America and Britain together spend more than $15 billion a year on CSR, according to an estimate by EPG, a consulting could add value to their businesses in three , consumers may take CSR spending as a “signal” that a pany’s products are of high , customers may be willing to buy a pany’s products as an indirect may to donate to the good causes it third, through a more diffuse “halo effect” whereby its good deeds earn it greater consideration from consumers and studies on CSR have had trouble differentiating these effects because consumers can be affected by all recent study attempts to separate them by looking at bribery prosecutions under American’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act(FCPA).It argues that since prosecutors do not consume a pany’s products as part of their investigations,they could be influenced only by the halo study found that,among prosecuted firms,those with the most prehensive CSR programmes tended to get more lenient analysis ruled out the possibility that it was firm’s political influence, rather than their CSR stand, that accounted for the leniency: Companies that contributed more to political campaigns did not receive lower all, the study concludes that whereas prosecutors should only evaluate a case based on its merits, they do seem to be influenced by a pany’s record in CSR.“We estimate that either eliminating a substantial labourrights concern, such as child labour, or increasing corporate giving by about20% result in fines that generally are 40% lower than the typical punishment for bribing foreign officials.” says one admit that their study does not answer the question at how much businesses ought to spend on does it reveal how much panies are banking on the halo effect, rather than the other possible benefits, when they panies get into trouble with the law, evidence of good character can win them a less costly author views Milton Friedman’s statement about CSR with [A]uncertainty [B]skepticism [C]approval [D]tolerance to Paragraph 2, CSR helps a pany by [A]guarding it against malpractices [B]protecting it from consumers [C]winning trust from consumers.[D]raising the quality of its products expression “more lenient”(line 2,)is closest in meaning to [A]less controversial [B]more lasting [C]more effective [D]less severe prosecutors evaluate a case, a pany’s CSR record [A]es across as reliable evidence [B]has an impact on their decision [C]increases the chance of being penalized [D]constitutes part of the investigation of the following is true of CSR according to the last paragraph? [A] The necessary amount of panies spending on it is unknown [B] Companies’ financial capacity for it has been overestimated [C] Its negative effects on businesses are often overlooked [D]It has brought much benefit to the banking industry Text 4There will eventually e a day when The New York Times ceases to publish stories on when that day will be is a matter of debate.”Sometime in the future,” the paper’s publisher said back in for ink on paper and the rustle of pages aside, there’s plenty of incentive to ditch infrastructure required to make a physical newspaper – printing presses, delivery trucks –isn’t just expensive。要緊緊圍繞“創(chuàng)先爭(zhēng)優(yōu)”中心工作,緊密聯(lián)系學(xué)校管理、教學(xué)科研等活動(dòng),使“創(chuàng)先爭(zhēng)優(yōu)”有效可行,而不只是注重形式。(三)“創(chuàng)先爭(zhēng)優(yōu)”,要堅(jiān)持“創(chuàng)新辦學(xué),創(chuàng)新教學(xué)”的理念。高校是學(xué)生與社會(huì)直接連接的場(chǎng)所,基層黨組織應(yīng)調(diào)整相應(yīng)教學(xué)計(jì)劃,為學(xué)生提供實(shí)踐場(chǎng)所,提高學(xué)生實(shí)踐能力,使學(xué)習(xí)理論與實(shí)際結(jié)合,以此達(dá)到教育面向社會(huì)的真正目的。具體包括教室、住宿、食堂及相應(yīng)的配套設(shè)施等硬件的健全,從而使每個(gè)學(xué)生學(xué)有所處、寢食能安。加強(qiáng)基層黨組織薄弱環(huán)節(jié)的工作,要根據(jù)高校基層黨組織實(shí)際,找出薄弱環(huán)節(jié),分類指導(dǎo),分類進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的完善與改進(jìn)。其次,要進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)高校中教學(xué)隊(duì)伍的師德師風(fēng)建設(shè)。② 所以,基層黨組織在整合學(xué)?!敖獭迸c“學(xué)”的實(shí)際情況基礎(chǔ)上,加強(qiáng)所有黨員關(guān)于黨的理論的學(xué)習(xí)與研討,在提高黨員自身理論素質(zhì)的同時(shí),使黨員以及相關(guān)基層黨組織能堅(jiān)持用“鄧小平理論”、“三個(gè)代表”重要思想、“科學(xué)發(fā)展觀”等黨的先進(jìn)思想進(jìn)行分析問(wèn)題、解決問(wèn)題。要通過(guò)創(chuàng)先爭(zhēng)優(yōu)活動(dòng),發(fā)揮高校黨委領(lǐng)導(dǎo)核心作用和基層黨組織的戰(zhàn)斗堡壘作用,促進(jìn)學(xué)??茖W(xué)發(fā)展。同志們,回顧建黨90年不平凡的歷程,我們無(wú)比自豪;展望更加美好的明天,我們信心百倍。我們黨在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)過(guò)程中,有過(guò)“左”的錯(cuò)誤,也有過(guò)“右”的錯(cuò)誤,既有成功的經(jīng)驗(yàn),也有失敗的教訓(xùn)。但是當(dāng)前,一些西方敵對(duì)勢(shì)力企圖通過(guò)否定黨的歷史、否定社會(huì)主義建設(shè)的歷史,加緊對(duì)我國(guó)實(shí)施西化、分化戰(zhàn)略,國(guó)內(nèi)一些別有用心的人也假借“反思”之名攻擊黨的路線方針政策,搞歷史虛無(wú)主義,利用歷史問(wèn)題做翻案文章。因此,我們加強(qiáng)理論研究,必須把黨的歷史作為研究的核心內(nèi)容,全面地了解和正確地認(rèn)識(shí)黨的光輝歷程、寶貴經(jīng)驗(yàn)和優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng),繼承和發(fā)揚(yáng)黨的光榮傳統(tǒng)和優(yōu)良作風(fēng),增強(qiáng)黨性,提高為黨的事業(yè)奮斗終身的自覺(jué)性和堅(jiān)定性。中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨90年不斷發(fā)展壯大的歷史證明:中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨是 1堅(jiān)持以馬克思主義為指導(dǎo)、在實(shí)踐中不斷豐富和發(fā)展馬克思主義的黨,是密切聯(lián)系群眾、完全為最廣大人民謀利益的黨,是始終高度重視并保持和發(fā)展先進(jìn)性的黨,是堅(jiān)持與時(shí)俱進(jìn)、富有創(chuàng)新精神的黨,是堅(jiān)持在引領(lǐng)中國(guó)發(fā)展進(jìn)步中自覺(jué)地加強(qiáng)和改進(jìn)自身建設(shè)的黨。這次理論研討會(huì),是慶祝建黨90周年系列活動(dòng)其中一項(xiàng)重要內(nèi)容。三、有關(guān)要求:企事業(yè)單位干部職工、廣大群眾。第二篇:慶祝建黨90周年理論研討會(huì)實(shí)施方案.俄黨發(fā)【2011】45號(hào)俄體鎮(zhèn)關(guān)于慶祝建黨90周年理論研討活動(dòng) 實(shí)施方案為了慶祝中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨成立90周年,深入學(xué)習(xí)貫徹十七屆五中全會(huì)的精神,全鎮(zhèn)開(kāi)展慶祝中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨成立90周年理論研討活動(dòng),活動(dòng)方案如下:一、指導(dǎo)思想以開(kāi)展慶祝中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨成立90周年理論研討活動(dòng)為契機(jī),回顧總結(jié)我黨艱辛光榮的發(fā)展歷程,梳理研究我黨積累的寶貴精神財(cái)富,深入總結(jié)黨的建設(shè)重要成果和基本經(jīng)驗(yàn),大力宣傳黨帶領(lǐng)全國(guó)各族人民取得的輝煌成績(jī),激勵(lì)和動(dòng)員全鎮(zhèn)人民在新的歷史起點(diǎn)上,為推動(dòng)俄體鎮(zhèn)科學(xué)和諧跨越發(fā)展,為實(shí)現(xiàn)全面小康社會(huì)目標(biāo)而努力奮斗。實(shí)質(zhì)上低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的模式、能源消費(fèi)模式、人類生活方式的一次新變革?!靶螒B(tài)論”觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,在發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的理論框架下,低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的碳排放量、生態(tài)環(huán)境代價(jià)及社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)成本最低的經(jīng)濟(jì),是低碳發(fā)展、低碳產(chǎn)業(yè)、低碳技術(shù)、低碳生活等一類經(jīng)濟(jì)形態(tài)的總稱,也是一種能夠改善地球生態(tài)系統(tǒng)自我調(diào)節(jié)能力的可持續(xù)發(fā)展的新經(jīng)濟(jì)形態(tài)。到工業(yè)化的初期階段,勞動(dòng)力比較密集,社會(huì)發(fā)展水平和人們生活質(zhì)量有 所提高。預(yù)計(jì)在20082012年這5年的時(shí)間內(nèi)每年碳減排量為7億—13億噸。隨后的15年中,國(guó)際社會(huì)都在為協(xié)商和制定二氧化碳減排的國(guó)際履約協(xié)議而努力,這些努力為孕育低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)和低碳社會(huì)播下了思想的種子。其二,煤炭、石油等能源資源耗竭是發(fā)展低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)的內(nèi)在要求。低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)概念的形成和提出背景,大致有以下兩個(gè)方面:其一,應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化,是低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)提出的最直接和最根本原因。%。過(guò)去15年,我們?cè)炝?5萬(wàn)座橋,基本上每年造1萬(wàn)座,長(zhǎng)度和數(shù)量是世界第一。解放初,我國(guó)城市人口只有12%,農(nóng)村人口是88%。我國(guó)改革開(kāi)放的第一大成就是經(jīng)濟(jì)高速發(fā)展。一、我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展取得巨大成就,但發(fā)展方式亟待轉(zhuǎn)變。改革開(kāi)放的第二大成就是城市化推進(jìn)。中國(guó)的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)是非常超前的。二氧化碳排放總量從1978年的1483百萬(wàn)噸增加到2008年的6896百萬(wàn)噸,%。二.低碳經(jīng)濟(jì):人類經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式的新變革(一)全球變暖和能源危機(jī)催生低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)2003年英國(guó)政府發(fā)表了《能源白皮書(shū)》題為:我們未來(lái)的能源:創(chuàng)建低碳經(jīng)濟(jì),首次提出了“低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)”概念,引起了國(guó)際社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注。因此,越來(lái)越多的人認(rèn)識(shí)到,為了實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展,就必須對(duì)人類的自身行為進(jìn)行必要約束,減少經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中二氧化碳的過(guò)量排放,實(shí)現(xiàn)人與自然和諧發(fā)展的“雙贏”局