【正文】 ation and management related influence on innovation in the ceramicsindustry is that of personalities。“這是一種榮譽(yù)和合作”客座編輯如是說。在最后一節(jié)，來賓編輯承認(rèn)這一特殊問題的貢獻(xiàn)者。由于蘇丹，法利，萊曼（ 1990）在 AMETA 分析報(bào)告學(xué)習(xí)，創(chuàng)新擴(kuò)散模型，其中包括著名的 Bass模型和及其變種，已成為非常有效以及高效。其次，企業(yè)尋求在經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的增長機(jī)會(huì)在技術(shù)的商業(yè)化的過程中變得越來越重要。開發(fā)一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的譚文卡塔斯，戴維斯，莫里斯他們盡量減少在許多方面的經(jīng)濟(jì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和自然風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。這個(gè)特殊的問題，涵蓋了廣泛的創(chuàng)新研究，但它主要集中在上述關(guān)鍵主題，從而促進(jìn)學(xué)術(shù)界和工業(yè)界。安娜 通常情況下，創(chuàng)新在行業(yè)中發(fā)揮的作用是至關(guān)重要的。明頓和斯波德喬賽亞在 18 世紀(jì)在英國斯塔福德郡成立了陶器聯(lián)盟，合并成為特倫 特河畔斯托克。 今天，新技術(shù)的重要性對英國的陶瓷生產(chǎn)與日俱增。 他們與監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)，以及企業(yè)的合作，也讓他們占盡地利，并提供他們的行業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的驅(qū)動(dòng)力。 各種發(fā)展的工業(yè)認(rèn)為，坦克和戰(zhàn)略方向的團(tuán)體，例如，制造改進(jìn)會(huì)，研究項(xiàng)目的引進(jìn)，類似于此，強(qiáng)調(diào)以進(jìn)一步創(chuàng)新過程具確定的意愿。因此，他們尋求外部資金和項(xiàng)目管理的支持。經(jīng)常在一些技術(shù)性的文獻(xiàn)中提到，在陶瓷行業(yè)對人才非常重視。無論是事實(shí)還是虛構(gòu)的，這凸顯了兩個(gè)項(xiàng)目技術(shù)至關(guān)的作用。 變現(xiàn)回報(bào) 一旦已經(jīng)實(shí)現(xiàn)了一個(gè)創(chuàng)新技術(shù)，它被出售或應(yīng)用于生產(chǎn)，就可以從它的使用效果或者收益判斷出這個(gè)技術(shù)是成功或者失敗。因此，往往尋求外部資金。 也顯示出資金來源和擁有深入的行 業(yè)知識(shí)是創(chuàng)新的重要推動(dòng)力。行業(yè)中的 技術(shù)創(chuàng)新組織 的作用，是保持和進(jìn)一步發(fā)展中發(fā)輝至關(guān)重要的作用。（ 4）與其他組織的合作項(xiàng)目來源；（ 5）與最終用戶的合作項(xiàng)目來源。 固體氧化物燃料電池的研究已經(jīng)持 續(xù)了接近十年。在靈光一現(xiàn)的瞬間，他向他的組織提出問題，如何有可能類似漂浮的方式來生產(chǎn)偶數(shù)層的玻璃。 另一個(gè)組織和管理帶來的顯著作用，就是陶瓷行業(yè)的創(chuàng)新意識(shí) 。這個(gè)項(xiàng)目的規(guī)劃和隨之而來的管理是很重要的，但是，非常依賴于創(chuàng)新的資金來源。最近，雖然輕微，用人經(jīng)理和管理人員從其他的趨勢，技術(shù)更先進(jìn)，產(chǎn)業(yè)強(qiáng)調(diào)這個(gè)。一 個(gè) RTO 通常代表一個(gè)技術(shù)型行業(yè)并建立在提供技術(shù)服務(wù)的公司成員的基礎(chǔ)上。為了應(yīng)對這種革命性的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營單位產(chǎn)生了，這個(gè)先行者就是韋奇伍德。 著名陶藝家喬賽亞早期生命周期的數(shù)據(jù)提供了有關(guān)見解在不同時(shí)期通過的決定因素的差異產(chǎn)品擴(kuò)散過程。創(chuàng)新是更重要的在高科技產(chǎn)業(yè)（科布林， 1991。如社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)（ SNS）的扮演重要的角色，通過營銷策略的創(chuàng)新，效率和效益的基礎(chǔ)在網(wǎng)上或移動(dòng) SNS 要求核查。在武裝廣大信息技術(shù)精明的消費(fèi)者的行為投機(jī)取巧的方式。測量和分類計(jì)劃必要的，以便在這個(gè)問題上的理論來構(gòu)建和測試。一種可能性是，目前的研究沒有注意到有工作創(chuàng)新發(fā)展的不同階段，不同的因素。創(chuàng)新采用與擴(kuò)散，從而產(chǎn)生了眾多的管理見解，有價(jià)值的高科技公司的經(jīng)理。 以下各節(jié)討論在研究領(lǐng)域的重大問題。盡管有許多的突破性技術(shù)的發(fā)展和產(chǎn)品，高科技企業(yè)，或大或小，仍掙扎在創(chuàng)建和擴(kuò)大新的市場機(jī)會(huì)。 which includes traditional ceramics and structural (bricks and roof tiles) and advanced ceramics. However, CERAM39。s success (Yalcinkaya, Calantone, amp。 adoption of innovative new products and how? * How can we forecast the speed and pattern of innovation diffusion? * How can we forecast the demand of innovative new products? * How do consumers behave in adopting (., making decisions and purchasing) innovative products? * What are the roles and traits of innovators and other adopter categories? * What roles do marketing actions play in innovation adoption and diffusion? A myriad of behavioral studies investigated the phenomenon of innovation adoption and diffusion, thereby yielding numerous managerial insights valuable for managers of hightech firms. Meanwhile, modeling and forecasting of innovation diffusion constitutes another big stream of research . As Sultan,Farley ,and Lehmann(1990)report in ametaanalysis study, innovation diffusion models, including the famous Bass model and its variants, have bee very effective as well as efficient. Another substantive venue of innovation research is socalled technology acceptance models(TAM),first in troduced by Fred Davis in 1989. Though the key elements of Davis (1989) model are ease of use and usefulness, there are various versions of TAM incorporating variables such as patibility, plexity, and relative advantage based on earlier studies (., Tornatzky amp。t made big strides for decades. Active research on many critical issues such as industryuniversity collaboration, technology transfer, and the evaluation of earlystage hightech firms, is necessary. Third, as the world bees smaller, the issue of global diffusion garners more attention. Therefore, more research on technology adoption needs to focus on the country level adoption rather than individual or pany level ones. To better understand and forecast the country level diffusion, one needs to figure out the differences among various economies in terms of information and munication infrastructure. Measurements and classification schemes are essential in order to build and test the theories on this matter. The fourth challenging issue in innovation and diffusion research is regarding the role of social works. A unified TAM developed by Venkatesh,Davis,Morris,Davis, and Davis(2020)identify social in fluenceas a key construct that determines both usage intention and usage behavior. Though theoretical research in this venue is very active these days(. Goldenberg et al.,2020。 Osegowitsch, 2020). Ana Lisboa, Dionysis Skarmeas, and Carmen Lages investigate the role of firm39。 individuals and groups that facilitate and stimulate the process of innovation. Often referred to in the literature as project champions or (technical) gatekeepers, there is much emphasis on the need for such individuals in the ceramics industry. The term personalities is used purposefully, since observation and interviews have highlighted that this is often what is needed in order to drive innovation forward. Interviews also emphasised some of the traits such as thorough flexibility and experience of the industry a personality should have. An often cited example of a project champion in the ceramics industry is that of Pilkington. Particulate material folklore has it that Pilkington wanted to produce flat screen glass, yet was unsure how to do it. One day, one of the members of the Pilkington family was washing up and noticed how the grease and washing fluid floated on the surface of the water. In a Eureka moment he posed the question to his organisation if it was possible to float glass in a similar fashion to produce an even layer. The result was a process for floating glass on liquid tin and drawing it through. Be it fact or fiction, this highlights the role of both the project champion and the technical gatekeeper. 5. Other influences on innovation The time that an innovation effort can take from the point of inception, through realisation and exploitation and to gaining a meaningful payback is something that is not often considered in the literature. In the ceramicsindustry, the timescale of innovation is of great importance. The research ident