【正文】
分屋頂坍塌問(wèn)題。津巴布韋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)協(xié)會(huì)總部的量化損失大約為 600 萬(wàn)津巴布韋幣(折合 120 萬(wàn)美元 )。該房屋并不在保險(xiǎn)范圍內(nèi),哈拉雷城市,一個(gè)政府自治區(qū) , 10 年之后下發(fā)了占有證書(shū) ,并且是在部分屋頂坍塌之后。建筑建設(shè)完工后,于 1991 年 9 月 12 日移交給業(yè)主。 委托方不想要驚喜,并且當(dāng)事情出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題更可能去訴訟。推斷 在部分屋頂坍塌之前 兩者之間的缺陷應(yīng)該及早發(fā)現(xiàn)并及時(shí) 糾正 是合理 。 the design is prepared without discussion between designers, manufacturers, suppliers and contractors. This means that the designer can not take advantage of suppliers? or contractors? knowledge of build ability or maintenance requirements and the impact these have on sustainability, the total cost of ownership or health and safety . 外文文獻(xiàn)及譯文 20200710 6 This risk analysis was able to facilitate, through its multidimensional approach to a critical examination of a construction problem, the identification of an effective risk management strategy for future construction projects. This work also served to emphasize the point that clients are being more demanding, more discerning, and less willing to accept risk without repense. They do not want surprises, and are more likely to engage in litigation when things go wrong. 外文文獻(xiàn)及譯文 20200710 7 中文譯文: 國(guó)際建設(shè)工程風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析 保羅 斯坦福 庫(kù)帕庫(kù)娃娜 工程造價(jià)卷 第五十一期 2020 年 9 月 9 日 摘要 此次分析用實(shí)例研究方法分析津巴布韋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)協(xié)會(huì)總部( SAZ)的屋頂部分坍塌的問(wèn)題。 obtain a bonded guaranteed maximum price。外文文獻(xiàn)及譯文 20200710 外文文獻(xiàn): Risk Analysis of the International Construction Project By: Paul Stanford Kupakuwana Cost Engineering Vol. 51/No. 9 September 2020 ABSTRACT This analysis used a case study methodology to analyse the issues surrounding the partial collapse of the roof of a building housing the headquarters of the Standards Association of Zimbabwe (SAZ). In particular, it examined the prior roles played by the team of construction professionals. The analysis revealed that the SAZ?s traditional construction project was generally characterized by high risk. There was a clear indication of the failure of a contractor and architects in preventing and/or mitigating potential construction problems as alleged by the plaintiff. It was reasonable to conclude that between them the defects should have been detected earlier and rectified in good time before the partial roof failure. It appeared justified for the plaintiff to have brought a negligence claim against both the contractor and the architects. The risk analysis facilitated, through its multidimensional approach to a critical examination of a construction problem, the identification of an effective risk management strategy for future construction projects. It further served to emphasize the point that clients are being more demanding, more discerning, and less willing to accept risk without repense. Clients do not want surprise, and are more likely to engage in litigation when things go wrong. KEY WORDS:Arbitration, claims, construction, contracts, litigation, project and risk The structural design of the reinforced concrete elements was done by consulting engineers Knight Piesold (KP). Quantity surveying services were provided by Hawkins, Leshnick amp。 centralize responsibility for construction under a single contract。 and reduce risk for the client, the architect and the CM. CM at Risk, a more professional approach to construction, is taking its place along with designbuild, bridg