【正文】 .....................................................................23REFERENCES 參考文獻(xiàn) .......................................................................25VITAE 個人簡歷 ....................................................................................26 《計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)英語》課程論文1《 Robotics and Autonomous Systems》 《機(jī)器人和自主系統(tǒng)》Volume 42, Issues 3–4, 31 March 2022, Pages 167–17542 卷，3–問題 4，2022 月 31，167–175 頁Socially Interactive Robots 交際互動的機(jī)器人Toward sociable robotsCynthia BreazealMIT Media Lab, 77 Massachusetts Ave, NE 185FL, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA面向交際的機(jī)器人辛西婭本文的其余部分，我們探討一些關(guān)鍵功能的交際機(jī)器人區(qū)別于其他人。 Humanoid robots。視頻游戲，如生物，讓參與者的“基因”設(shè)計(jì)的圖形動物，然后與他們互動?；趫鏊膴蕵窇?yīng)用，如博物館導(dǎo)游機(jī)器人[ 13 ]不僅提供娛樂價(jià)值也提供游客感興趣的信息。2. Paradigms of social robots 交際機(jī)器人的樣式 It is important to recognize that humans are a profoundly social species. Our socialemotional intelligence is a useful and powerful means for understanding the behavior of, and for interacting with, some of the most plex entities in our world—people and other living creatures [12]. Faced with nonliving things of sufficient plexity (., when the observable behavior is not easily understood in terms of its underlying mechanisms), we often apply a social model to explain, understand, and predict their behavior as well [15]. For instance, we are all familiar that people anthropomorphize all sorts of technologies (., cars, puters, etc.). The studies of Premack and Premack [14] show that people attribute mental states (., intents, beliefs, feelings, desires, etc.) to describe the behavior of interacting shapes on a screen. Even Braitenberg [4] often uses such mentalistic terms to describe the behavior of his ingenious vehicles. Right or wrong, people rely on social models (or fluidly switch between using a social model with other mental models) to make plex behavior more familiar and understandable and more intuitive with which to interact. We do this because it is enjoyable for us, and it is often surprisingly quite useful.認(rèn)識到人類是一個深刻的社會物種很重要。普雷馬克研究和普雷馬克[ 14 ]表明，人們的心理狀態(tài)歸因的研究（即，意圖，信仰，情感，欲望，等等）來描述相互作用的形狀在屏幕上的行為。We argue that people will generally apply a social model when observing and interacting with autonomous robots. Autonomous robots perceive their world, make decisions on their own, and perform coordinated actions to carry out their tasks. As with living things, their behavior is a product of its internal state as well as physical laws. Augmenting such selfdirected, creaturelike behavior with the ability to municate with, cooperate with, and learn from people makes it almost impossible for one to not anthropomorphize them (., attribute human or animallike qualities). We refer to this class of autonomous robots as social robots,1 ., those that people apply a social model to in order to interact with and to understand. 我們認(rèn)為，人們在觀察和自主機(jī)器人的相互作用時一般會運(yùn)用交際模型。我們指的這一類的自主機(jī)器人為交際機(jī)器人，1 即，那些人申請一個交際的模型，以互動和理解。 ）你可以想象一下各種交際機(jī)器人的子類談吐不凡的樣子。As the plexity of the environment and the scenario increases, however, the social sophistication of the robot will clearly have to scale accordingly. If the robot’s observable behavior adheres to a person’s social model for it during unconstrained interactions in the full plexity of the human environment, then we argue that the robot is socially intelligent in a genuine sense. Basically, the person can engage the robot as one would another socially responsive creature, and the robot does the same. At the pinnacle of performance, this would rival human–human interaction. However, we take the position that dogs, for instance, are another socially responsive species—socially intelligent in a genuine sense, although their social sophistication is less than that of a human. Hence, this criterion for success should not be confused with trying to build a robot that is indistinguishable from a human inside and out—the appearance of the robot and its internal design details can be quite different from the human 《計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)英語》課程論文6counterpart, what matters is how it interacts facetoface with people, and how people interact with it in the human environment. One could imagine devising a sort of test for sociability, where the behavior of both the human and the robot are evaluated in order to determine success.隨著環(huán)境和場景復(fù)雜性的增加，然而，機(jī)器人的交際復(fù)雜顯然也會出現(xiàn)相應(yīng)的規(guī)模。然而，我們以狗作為例子，它在一定意義上是一種社會智能的物種，雖然他們的交際的復(fù)雜性是低于人類的。在所有的情況下，人們傾向于人格化這些機(jī)器人為了與他們互動。這是很常見在培育新型杠桿產(chǎn)生一個有趣的相互作用的玩具（例如，tomogotchis 和各種各樣的機(jī)器人“寵物” ） 。Social interface. This subclass of robots uses humanlike social cues and munication modalities in order to facilitate interactions with people (., to make the interactions more natural and familiar). For instance, one might adopt a performance model to municate with others from far away using a robot avatar (giving the distal person both a physical presence and social presence to others). In this case, such a robot would need sufficient social intelligence to appropriately convey (or perform) a person’s message to others, plemented with gaze, gestures, facial expression, etc. More monly, an interface model is used, such as robot museum tour guides, where information is municated to people using speech and sometimes with reflexive facial expressions. Because this class of robot tends to value social behavior only at the interface, the social model that the robot has for the person tends to be shallow (if any) and the social behavior is often precanned or reflexive.能與人交流。因?yàn)檫@類機(jī)器人有價(jià)值的社會行為只在交流，使人往往認(rèn)為機(jī)器人是膚淺的交際模式（如果有）和交際行為往往是先罐裝或反射。一個特定的能力，認(rèn)知建模是更受歡迎的。他們在交際方面是被動的，然而，它能回應(yīng)人們的努力，與之互動，但是它不積極與人互動，來滿足其內(nèi)部的交際需求。因此，人們的社會交往的價(jià)值不只是在界面，也在語用和功能水平上。3. Our sociable robot, Kismet 我們的交際機(jī)器人，使命This remainder of this paper focuses on the last paradigm, robot as sociable creature. We highlight a few core attributes of sociable robots by means of a smal