【正文】 模型數(shù)據(jù)量偏少，且自變量?jī)H有煤炭銷(xiāo)售量，忽略了其他影響經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的重要解釋變量，模型結(jié)果可能存在偏差。結(jié)果表明，煤炭資源開(kāi)發(fā)對(duì)于地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展具有顯著促進(jìn)作用。本文的實(shí)證研究表明，大型煤炭企業(yè)對(duì)地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)具有促進(jìn)作用，中小型煤炭企業(yè)對(duì)地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)無(wú)顯著影響。 附件 2：外文原文（復(fù)印件） Shanxi coal resources development and economic development relationship of empirical research Resource development and economic development, what is the relationship between is academia have been focused on an issue. Until the 1960 s, represented by the North39。s market petitiveness. In April 2020, shanxi coal industry restructuring has carried out a storm, the annual output of 300000 t coal mine under all the closed out, adjust the goal is to realize the upgrade of the coal industry, coal circulation economy development, the stretched industrial chain. Because time is too short, also do not have enough data to test the restructuring for the economic development of shanxi coal industry, but according to the results of the empirical research of this paper can foresee, it will be sustained and healthy development of shanxi economy plays an important role in promoting. 。 , both the research using the time series model, this paper USES the panel data model, in order to better control the individual heterogeneity, improve the degree of freedom of the models, to enhance the effectiveness of the estimate. Finally, this research distinguish between large coal enterprises and small and mediumsized coal enterprises resources development for regional economic development, the influence of the previous research did not consider. Based on abundant coal resources of Shanxi Province as an example, using panel data model for coal resources exploitation and the relationship between the economic development has carried on the empirical research. The results show that the coal resources development for regional economic development has a significant role in promoting. Potential superiority in coal of shanxi, shanxi and hope also in coal, twelfth fiveyear period, shanxi39。 2020 年 4 月，山西省開(kāi)展了一場(chǎng)煤炭產(chǎn)業(yè)重組風(fēng)暴，年產(chǎn)量 30 萬(wàn) t 以下的煤礦全部淘汰關(guān)閉，調(diào)整的目標(biāo)是實(shí)現(xiàn)煤炭產(chǎn)業(yè)的升級(jí)，發(fā)展煤炭循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)，拉長(zhǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈。為了使煤炭資源開(kāi)發(fā)更好地服務(wù)于山西的可持續(xù)健康發(fā)展，應(yīng)盡量避免 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)，即避免自然資源對(duì)人力資本投入、創(chuàng)新行為等產(chǎn)生的擠出效應(yīng)。最后，本研究區(qū)分大型煤炭企業(yè)與中小型煤炭企業(yè)資源開(kāi)發(fā)對(duì)于區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響，這是以往研究所沒(méi)有考慮的。其次，馮宗憲等指出國(guó)內(nèi)關(guān)于 “ 資源詛咒 ” 問(wèn)題的實(shí)證研究，大多由于沒(méi)有在回歸方程中加入?yún)^(qū)位這一非常顯著的控制變量，而使回歸 結(jié)果存在較大偏誤，得到資源開(kāi)發(fā)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展負(fù)相關(guān)這樣值得商榷的結(jié)論。 上述研究均是從省際層面探討了 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)，而景普秋、王清憲從省域、地級(jí)市、縣域三個(gè)層面分析了山西省資源詛咒效應(yīng)，指出豐富的煤炭資源既是經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的動(dòng)力，也加劇了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的波動(dòng)。 徐康寧、王劍以我國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)為樣本，對(duì) “ 資源詛咒 ” 命題進(jìn)行了實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)，結(jié)果表明該命題在我國(guó)地區(qū)層面成立，多數(shù)省份豐裕的自然資源并未成為經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的有利條件， 反而制約了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)，該文以山西為典型省份，揭示了密集而過(guò)度的資源開(kāi)采引致了制造業(yè)衰退和制度弱化，從而制約了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的資源詛咒作用機(jī)理。雖然 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)得到了眾多研究的支持，但是也有研究表明資源豐度與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)沒(méi) 有負(fù)向 關(guān)系。其他學(xué)者如 Leite 和 Weidmann, Gylfason,Papyrakis和 Gerlagh等的實(shí)證研究都支持了 “ 資源詛咒 ” 這一假說(shuō) [57]。山西是煤炭大省，全省儲(chǔ)煤面積占近 40%， 1979年到 2020年間山西省累計(jì)生產(chǎn)原煤 90億 t，占全國(guó)原煤總產(chǎn)量的 %，因此可以忽略其他資源的影響。但也有學(xué)者提出 “ 資源詛咒論 ” ，認(rèn)為豐富的自然資源阻礙了地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。 20 世紀(jì) 60年代之前 ,以 North為代表的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家普遍認(rèn)為自然資源是資本積累的前提與源泉，豐富的自然資源對(duì)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)具有正向作用。有的學(xué)者以某類(lèi)資源組合的豐度來(lái) 考察地區(qū)資源豐度，但是由于資源種類(lèi)繁多，假設(shè) “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)確實(shí)存在，各種資源的權(quán)重也應(yīng)不一樣，而現(xiàn)有研究并沒(méi)有考慮這一點(diǎn)，從而造成資源開(kāi)發(fā)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展之間關(guān)系實(shí)證研究結(jié)論的偏差。 Sachs和 Warner對(duì)資源詛咒假說(shuō)進(jìn)行了開(kāi)創(chuàng)性的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn) ,他們以 95個(gè)發(fā)展中國(guó)家 1970年