【正文】 鄭州科技學院本科畢業(yè)論文（外文翻譯）題 目 論信用證的軟條款及自我防范措施 學生姓名 胡亞蘭 專業(yè)班級 09級國際經(jīng)濟與貿(mào)易三班 學 號 200936063 院 （系） 經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易系 指導教師(職稱) 王自娜 完成時間 2013 年 月 日 Fraud in the Letter of Credit Transaction and its Possible ArbitrationInstitute of Comparative Law McGill University Gernot Fohler Abstract The letter of credit continues to play an indispensable role in the financing and securing of international mercial transactions. Its usefulness and efficacy derives primarily from the fact that it is independent from the underlying relationship between buyer and seller. In a considerable number of cases, however, the independence of the letter of credit has been challenged as a result of fraud in the underlying transaction. After analyzing recent reforms of the regulatory framework governing letters of credit, this fraud exception to the independence principle will be reappraised in the light of current developments in Canada and the United States. Finally, the author argues that arbitration can and indeed should play an increasingly important role in the resolution of international letter of credit disputes involving fraud in the transaction.1 About L/C fraud The L/C cycle operates in the following way: after a buyer and a seller have entered into a sales contract, the buyer applies for a L/C from an issuing bank. Upon receiving the L/C, the seller would check its authenticity with an advising bank. Having confirmed the L/C is correct, the seller exports the goods and prepares a series of documents such as Inspection Certificate, Bill of Lading etc., proving to its negotiating bank that the goods shipped are in accordance with the buyer’s standard. Before the negotiating bank releases money to the seller, it will check on face value that the submitted documents tally with the buyer’s instruction. Thereafter, the negotiating bank will forward the documents to the buyer through its issuing bank.In order to obtain these documents from the issuing bank, the buyer will have to either plete its payment or enter into mutual agreement with the issuing bank on a payment date. With the documents at hand, the buyer could get the goods at the port and thus the L/C cycle pletes. The entire L/C cycle is governed by the internationally recognized regulation —UCP 600, which is issued by the International Chamber of Commerce.The L/C cycle is parable to credit card transactions, in which a bank promises to pay on behalf of the buyer (.Independence Principle).This payment method is independent from the underlying business transaction. The bank is plied to honor the L/C as long as the submitted documents, on its face, is correct. (Compliance Principle)Despite the availability of regulations and scrutiny of the banks, there is inevitably weakness in the L/C system. It is not unmon for the fraudsters to exploit the Independence Principle and the Compliance Principle. After all, the bank only examines the document, but not physically examines the goods at the port.It is mon for sellers to cheat the L/C cycle. As in a typical L/C fraud scenario, a seller ships out substandard goods ( short shipment). In other cases, the shipment in fact may not exist ( false shipment) where the seller defrauds the bank by presenting false Bill of Lading to support the existence of the shipment. If the bank fails to timely discover the scam, it will release money to the seller and then, the case will not surface until the buyer physically receives the goods at a later stage.Although it is not prevalent, a buyer sometimes cheats the L/C cycle. The typical trick is that a buyer places an order to a seller and requests the payment be settled by L/C. The buyer also requests to arrange transportation for the