外文翻譯--中國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)以及外國(guó)的直接投資-其他專(zhuān)業(yè)-閱讀頁(yè)
2025-02-08 09:53本頁(yè)面
【正文】 have analyzed the effect of various economic determinants of FDI, very few have examined the role of IPR as advocated in this study. Lee and Mansfield (1996) authored one of the first empirical investigations of the possible linkage between a developing country’s IPR protection system and the volume and position of US FDI in that country. Their empirical evidence indicates that the strengthening of IPR protection has a positive effect on FDI inflows. In a more recent study, Javorcik (2021) exa mined the effect of IPR on the position of FDI for a group of transition economies in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The study concludes that weak IPR protection has a negative effect on FDI in technologyintensive sectors. Similarly, Nunnenkamp and Spatz (2021) investigated the IPRFDI linkage using sectorally disaggregated FDI data for a large sample of host countries and found that stronger IPR protection played a positive role in attracting FDI. In China’s case, while qualitative analyzes on the role of IPR on its economy abound, datadriven empirical studies have been relatively scarce. Recently, Du et al. (2021) investigated the relationship between regional economic institutional factors (., property rights protection and contract enforcement) and the locational choice of US multinational firms in Their results, based on a panel data set (1993–2021), suggest that US multinationals prefer investing in the regions that have better IPR protection, less government intervention in business, and better contract enforcement. However, their decision to use governmentapproved number of patents by each province as a proxy variable for regional IPR protection could be problematic. Although there may be some regional variations in the level of economic development and institutional infrastructures, no such variation exist for IPR protection across provinces since China has uniform national IPR Thus, statistical inference emphasizing regional variations in the effect of IPR on FDI may be questionable when the IPR protection proxy variable does not vary across regions. Concluding remarks This paper examines the contribution of IPR protection to the recent surge in China’s inward flow of FDI. While several studies have investigated the impact of various factors as determinants of FDI into developing nations, the role of IPR has been relatively ignored. China is an interesting case study given its role as a major developing economy, which presents multinational firms with a strong threat of imitation. In its attempt to obtain 12 membership in the WTO, China has experienced notable changes in its IPR systems in the past decade. Using a panel data for 38 diverse countries from 1992 to 2021, the empirical evidence suggests that the strengthening of IPR protection in China has a positive and significant effect in attracting FDI. In addition to IPR, the results also show that measures of market size, regional integration, and transportation and trade costs are important determinants of FDI in China. Furthermore, this result is robust to alternative model specifications and segmentation of the data sample. Overall, our results suggest that the strengthening of IPR in developing countries, particularly large economies, might play a positive role in attracting FDI and thus promote technology transfer. 13 教師評(píng)語(yǔ) 教師評(píng)語(yǔ)：教師評(píng)語(yǔ)應(yīng)圍繞選題是否符合專(zhuān)業(yè)要求、語(yǔ)言是否通順、邏輯是否合理、有無(wú)明顯翻譯錯(cuò)誤等內(nèi)容來(lái)寫(xiě)， 必須手寫(xiě)，不準(zhǔn)打印， 100 字左右
教學(xué)課件相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1