【正文】
在超過65萬人次的投票中,%的網(wǎng)友就直接反對取消“五一”黃金周,理由多集中于“少了回家探親和長時間段旅游的機會”;%的網(wǎng)友選擇贊成。第二篇:五一黃金周是否應該被取消Should the Gold Week Holidays Be Abolished?Should the Golden Week holidays be abolished is a heated topic since its proposition and enforcement in government believes that the too closed holidays lead to the great pressure to the transportation and travel industry, and increase the destroy to the natural scenary and historic sites and the public refused the abolishment of the Golden Week 39。 reasons are as , the abolition of the Golden Week holiday actually intrude people39。 s rest time, and if their work or study is really very busy, they may have no holiday at all, not to say refreshing themselves , people will do not have enough recreation to 13day holidays in Korea, 12day holidays in Japan in a just have can we plan our social life, such as traveling, wedding, or e to see three days people can go nowhere but places that just near you home, can do nothing but stay at last one, it does cause greater pressure on the transportation on the Golden Week holiday by largely increased outings when people can only condense the three golden week holidays into twoNational holidays and spring conclude, the abolishment is not a good way to solve the problem of decreasing the pressure to the transportation and traveling, but a way of disturbing people39。七天時間的長假給我們的交通,環(huán)境帶來了多大的壓力啊,縱使是能帶來一定的經(jīng)濟效益,但是和對旅游勝地帶來的超負荷壓力所造成的損失來說是不足道的?!辈汤^明說,從經(jīng)濟學角度分析取消黃金周是典型的“帕累托”改進,意思是這種改變在不損害任何一方利益的情況下,至少使一部分人受益,而黃金周取消的受益者卻是全社會?!斑@種現(xiàn)狀是病態(tài)的,而且黃金周取