【正文】 講稿開場(chǎng)白Opening Statement, senator thurmond, members of the mittee, my name is anita , and i am a professor of law at the university of was born on a farm in okmulgee county, oklahoma, in am the youngest of 13 had my early education in okmulgee father, albert hill, is a farmer in that mother39。 signature on the education of minority second was the organization of a seminar on highrisk students which was abandoned because judge thomas transferred to the eeoc where he became the chairman of that this period at the department of education, my working relationship with judge thomas was had a good deal of responsibility and thought he respected my work and that he trusted my approximately three months of working there, he asked me to go out socially with happened next and telling the world about it are the two most difficult thingsexperiences of my is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration and sleeplenumbera great number of sleeplenights tha(t i am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone but my close declined the invitation to go out socially with him and explained to him that i thought it would jeopardize what at the time i considered to be a very good working had a normal social life with other men outside of the believed then, as now, that having a social relationship with a person who was supervising my work would be was very unfortable with the idea and told him thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social , to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to incidents took place in his office or were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual conversations were very spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penions, thomas told me graphically of his own sexual i was extremely unfortable talking about sex with him at all and particularly in such a graphic way, i told him that i did not want to talk about these would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his efforts to change the subject were rarely the period of these conversations, he also from time to time asked me for social reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended was difficult because at the time i was his only assistant at the office of educationor office for civil thought that by saying no and explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social , to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to incidents took place in his office or were in the form of private conversations which would not have been overheard by anyone working relationship became even more strained when judge thomas began to use work situations to these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual conversations were very spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large pe