【正文】 explaining my reasons my employer would abandon his social , to my regret, in the following few weeks, he continued to ask me out on several pressed me to justify my reasons for saying no to incidents took place in his office or were in the form of private conversations which notwould not have been overheard by anyone working relationship became even more strained when Judge Thomas began to use work situations to discuss these occasions, he would call me into his office for reports on education issues and projects, or he might suggest that, because of the time pressures of his schedule, we go to lunch to a government a brief discussion of work, he would turn the conversation to a discussion of sexual conversations were very spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape talked about pornographic materials depicting individuals with large penises or large breasts involved in various sex several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual I was extremely unfortable talking about sex with him at all, and particularly in such a graphic way, I told him that I did not want to talk about these would also try to change the subject to education matters or to nonsexual personal matters such as his background or his efforts to change thethe subject were rarely the period of these conversations, he also, from time to time, asked me for social reaction to these conversations was to avoid them by eliminating opportunities for us to engage in extended was difficult because at the time I was his only assistant at the Office of Educationor Office for Civil the latter part of my time at the Department of Education, the social pressures and any conversation of his offensive behavior began both to believe and hope that our working relationship could be a proper, cordial, and professional Judge Thomas was made chair of the EEOC, I needed to face the question of whether to go with was asked to do so, and I work itself was interesting, and at that time it appeared that the sexual overtures which had so troubled me had also faced the realistic fact that I had no alternative I might have gone back to private practice, perhaps in my old firm or at another, I was dedicated to civil rights work, and my first choice was to be in that , the Department of Education itself was a dubious Reagan was seeking to abolish the entire my first months at the EEOC, where I continued to be an assistant to Judge Thomas, there were no sexual conversations or , during the fall and winter of 1982, these began ments were random and ranged from pressing me about why I didn39。第一篇：美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇Statement to the Senate Judiciary...美國經(jīng)典英文演講100篇: Statement to the Senate Judiciary...Anita HillOpening Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committeedelivered 11 October 1991, Washington, .[Contains adult language and subject matter][AUTHENTICITY CERTIFIED: Text version below transcribed directly from audio]: , Senator Thurmond, members of the mittee: My name is Anita , and I am a professor of law at the University of was born on a farm in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, in am the youngest of 13 had my early education in Okmulgee father, Albert Hill, is a farmer in that mother39。s name is Irma is also a farmer and a childhood was one of a lot of hard work and not much money, but it was one of solid family affection, as represented by my was reared in a religious atmosphere in the Baptist faith, and I have been a member of the Antioch Baptist Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma, since is a very warm part of my life at the present my undergraduate work, I went to Oklahoma State University and graduated from there in am attaching to this statement a copy of my resume for further details of my Biden: It will be included in the record as if : Thank graduated from the university with academic honors and proceeded to the Yale Law School, where I received my JD degree in graduation from law school, I became a practicing lawyer with the Washington, DC, firm of Ward, Hardraker, and 1981, I was introduced to now Judge Thomas by a mutual Thomas told me that he was anticipating a political appointment, and he asked if I would be interested in working with was, in fact, appointed as Assistant Secretary of Education for Civil he wasAfter he had taken that post, he asked if I would bee his assistant, and I accepted that my early period there, I had two major first was an article I wrote for Judge Thomas39。t go out with him to remarks about my personal remember his saying that some day I would have to tell him the real reason that I wouldn39。ve had minimal contacts with Judge Clarence Thomas am of course aware from the Press that some questions have been raised about conversations I had with Judge Clarence Thomas after I left the 1983 until today, I have seen Judge Thomas only one occasion, I needed to get a reference from him, and on another he made a public appearance in one occasion he called me at home and we had an inconsequential one occasion he called me without reaching me, and I returned the call without reaching him, and nothing came of have, on at least three occasions, been asked to [act] as a conduit to him for knew his secretary, Diane had worked together at both EEOC and were occasions on which I spoke to her, and on some of these occasions undoubtedly I passed on some casual ment to then Chairman were a series of calls in the first three months of 1985, occasioned by a group in Tulsa, which wished to have a civil rights wanted Judge Thomas to be the speaker and enlisted my assistance for this did call in January and February to no effect, and finally suggested to the person directly involved, Susan Cahall, that she put thethat she put the matter into her own hands and call did so in March of connection with that March invitation, wanted conference materials for t