【正文】 at the military had to remain to suppress rebellion and anize government.【影響的結(jié)果】 requisition n. 征用； (財(cái)產(chǎn)或材料的正式 )征用令；申請(qǐng)書(shū) vt. 征用 ,征發(fā) imposition n. 強(qiáng)加 ,被迫接受；過(guò)分的要求 ,不合理的負(fù)擔(dān)； 稅收 paragraph 2Economic exchange was clearly very important as the Roman army brought with it very substantial spending power. Locally a fort had two kinds of impact. Its large population needed food and other supplies. Some of these were certainly brought from long distances, but demands were inevitably placed on the local area. Although goods could be requisitioned, they were usually paid for, and this probably stimulated changes in the local economy. When not campaigning, soldiers needed to be occupied。 animals.（無(wú)） ○It provied local leaders with opportunities to participate in governance（反） 4The wordsuppress in the passage is closet in the meaning to ○respond to ○warn against ○avoid the impact of ○stop by force 鎮(zhèn)壓反叛，就是暴力停止 （第一段，結(jié)構(gòu)分析 In the wake of the Roman Empire39。 animals. The imposition of military rule also robbed local leaders of opportunities to participate in local government, so social development was stunted and the seeds of disaffection sown. This then meant that the military had to remain to suppress rebellion and anize government. 1Which of the sentences below best expresses the essential information in the highlighted sentence in the passage?In correct choices change the meaning in important ways or leave out essential information （題干兩個(gè)意思， 1 停留在新省（推斷出是英格蘭）， 2產(chǎn)生巨大影響） ○Many Roman soldiers remained in Britain after conquering it, and their presence had a strong influence. ○The new Roman province of Britain seemed to awaken in the first century . as the local economy improved.（少） ○Camps, fortifications, and economic change contributed to the Roman conquest of Britain.（無(wú)） ○With the conquest of Britain by Roman troops, the Roman Empire gained considerable economic strength.（無(wú)） 2According to paragraph 1, the Roman army had the most influence on these areas of Britain that were ○conquered first （無(wú)） ○near population centers ○used as military bases （ Where the army remained stationed, its presence was much more influential和下一句 military bases 的改寫(xiě) ） ○rapidly incorporated into the empire（無(wú)） 3According to paragraph 1, what effect did military occupation have on the local population? ○It encouraged more even distribution of the population and the settlement of previously undeveloped territory（ The imposition of a military base involved the requisition of native lands for both the fort and the territory needed to feed and exercise the soldiers39。 otherwise they represented a potentially dangerous source of friction and disloyalty. Hence a writing tablet dated 25 April tells of 343 men at one fort engaged on tasks like shoemaking, building a bathhouse, operating kilns, digging clay, and working lead. Such activities had a major effect on the local area, in particular with the construction of infrastructure such as roads, which improved access to remote areas. Each soldier received his pay, but in regions without a developed economy there was initially little on which it could be spent. The pool of excess cash rapidly stimulated a thriving economy outside fort gates. Some of the demand for the services and goods was no doubt fulfilled by people drawn from far afield, but some local people certainly became entwined in this new economy. There was informal marriage with soldiers, who until AD 197 were not legally entitled to wed, and whole new munities grew up near the forts. These settlements acted like small towns, being centers for the artisan and trading populations. The army also provided a means of personal advancement for auxiliary soldiers recruited from the native peoples, as a man obtained hereditary Roman citizenship on retirement after service in an auxiliary regiment. Such units recruited on an ad hoc (as needed) basis from the area in which they were stationed, and there was evidently largescale recruitment within Britain. The total numbers were at least 12,500 men up to the reign of the emperor Hadrian (. 117138), with a peak around . 80. Although a small proportion of the total population, this perhaps had a massive local impact when a large proportion of the young men were removed from an area. Newly raised regiments were normally transferred to another province from whence it was unlikely that individual recruits would ever return. Most units raised in Britain went elsewhere on the European continent, although one is recorded in Morocco. The reverse process brought young men to Britain, where many continued to live after their 20 to 25 years of service, and this added to the cosmopolitan Roman character of the frontier population. By the later Roman period, frontier garrisons (groups of soldiers) were only rarely transferred, service in units became effectively hereditary, and forts were no longer populated or maintained at full strength. This process of settling in as a munity over several generations, bined with local recruitment, presumably accounts for the apparent stability of the British northern frontier in the later Roman period. It also explains why some of the forts continued in occupation long after Rome ceased to have any formal authority in Britain, at the beginning of the fifth century . The circumstances that had allowed natives to bee Romanized also led the selfsustaining military munity of the frontier area to bee effectively British. paragraph 1【 In the wake of the Roman Empire39。s conquest of Britain in the first century ., a large number of troops stayed in the new province, and these troops had a considerable impact on Britain with their camps, fortifications, and participation in the local economy. Assessing the impact of the army on the civilian populat