【正文】 生在捕捉細(xì)節(jié)信息的基礎(chǔ)上，進(jìn)一步根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行分析，推理，概括和歸納，從而選出正確答案。re here, if any votes e up in the near future, which will have an impact on the next five decades of British political life, alongside EU migrants, 16yearolds certainly should be enfranchised.”可知，作者認(rèn)為6歲的孩子不應(yīng)該獲得選舉權(quán)，但是如果將來有任何會影響英國以及歐盟移民未來50年政治生活的投票出現(xiàn)話，16歲的孩子應(yīng)該被賦予選舉權(quán)，由此可知作者認(rèn)為兒童被賦予選舉權(quán)并不完全是荒謬的。根據(jù)最后一段“In short: no, sixyearolds should not get the vote。故選C。 （5）考查推理判斷。t mind someone else not having.”可知，孩子反對私有財(cái)產(chǎn)，因?yàn)樗麄冇X得每個(gè)人需要房子，他們不應(yīng)該花錢買房，此外食物也應(yīng)該是免費(fèi)的，這是一種前馬克思共產(chǎn)主義的想法，由此可推測孩子更加公平，更期待理想社會。根據(jù)倒數(shù)第四段中的“My kid, when he was six, made quite a forceful case against private property, on the basis that, since everybody needed a house, they shouldn39。故選D。根據(jù)第三段中的“Runciman39。故選A。根據(jù)第二段中的“Nobody would say that a sixyearold could be held criminally responsible, could be sent to war, could be capable of consent, could be given responsibility for anything.”沒人說6歲的孩子會被追究刑事責(zé)任，會被送上戰(zhàn)場，會有同意的能力，會被賦予任何責(zé)任。故選C。d say I was easily old enough to vote at 16, but nobody should have given me a credit card until I was 32, and I39。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。The definition of adulthood is quite controversial.D.There is a difference between adults and children.B.D.C.parents39。twisted cultures trickD.t want to be involved in politicsC.children are in favor of a just society and tend to be idealisticB.D.A cultural preference for the old.B.s abilities.s argument? A.they don39。they are uncertain whether children can assume responsibilityC.s proposal because ________. A.people mature at different rates in various aspectsD.there39。re here, if any votes e up in the near future, which will have an impact on the next five decades of British political life, alongside EU migrants, 16yearolds certainly should be enfranchised.（1）The author refers to his age of adulthood to prove that ________. A.In short: no, sixyearolds should not get the vote。t be trusted, otherwise we39。t necessarily have a problem with that, apart from, obviously, that culture is already wildly twisted towards parents, and I can imagine a few nonparents boiling with fierce anger. But that39。 s so much enfranchisement (選舉權(quán)) in it for us?re united, which brings us to the point of the problem: children obey you on almost nothing, but they do seem to believe in your politics until they39。 t mind someone else not having.Having said that, children do tend towards the progressive, having a natural sense of justice (which kicks in at the age of six months, psychologists have shown, by creating scenes of great unfairness to babies, and making them cry) and an underdeveloped sense of selfinterest. My kid, when he was six, made quite a forceful case against private property, on the basis that, since everybody needed a house, they shouldn39。s not children39。 t even recognize plays a central role, which is pletely unfair.The first part of his case is selfevident: pensions are protected while children39。t (he added) ever need to demonstrate mental capacity, even long after they39。Runciman39。s a difference between a child and an adult, even if we might argue about the transition point. So the political theorist David Runciman39。 ve got the county court judgment to prove it.t be a human process. Indeed, maturation happens at varying speeds across different categories within the same individual, so I39。 人教版閱讀理解專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練單元達(dá)標(biāo)專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練學(xué)能測試一、高考英語閱讀理解專項(xiàng)訓(xùn)練1．閱讀理解 The age of adulthood is by definition arbitrary. If everyone matured at the same, fixed rate, it wouldn39。d say I was easily old enough to vote at 16, but nobody should have given me a credit card until I was 32, and I39。However, we broadly agree that there39。s view that sixyearolds should be allowed to vote goes against any standard argument about the age of civic responsibility. Nobody would say that a sixyearold could be held criminally responsible, could be sent to war, could be capable of consent, could be given responsibility for anything. So allowing them the vote—along with, unavoidably, sevenyearolds who are even sillier, if anything—is quite an amusing proposal. s argument is that this is the only way to rebalance political life, which is currently twisted in favor of the old, who don39。ve lost it. s centers are closed, concepts such as sovereignty (最高權(quán)威) are prioritized over the far more urgent business of the future: climate change. Nostalgia (懷念) for a past the young wouldn39。Most of the arguments against giving sixyearolds a vote are that children would end up voting for something damaging and chaotic, if someone made unrealistic promises to them, which could never be realized. Well, it39。s fault. t cost money, because nobody would want anyone else not to have one. Also, food should be free. It was a kind of preMarx munism, where you limit the coverage of the market to only those things that you wouldn39。On that particular day, when we were registered as voters, my kid was quite far to the left of me, but in the normal run of things, we39。re adolescent. So giving kids the vote is really just a way of giving parents extra votes. And what can stop us having even more children, once there39。Now, if parents could be trusted to use their influence wisely, and hammer into children the politics it will take to assure a better future, then I wouldn39。s not worth talking about anyway, because parents can39。d all already vote Green(綠黨). but while we39。certain rights are granted at different stages of lifeB.s a mon standard for the age of adulthoodC.a credit card is more difficult to get than the vote（2）People reject David Runciman39。they believe children are far from mature in many waysB.they know the age to get the vote is not to