【正文】 evolving antfriendly features. 【點評】本題考點涉及細節(jié)理解和推理判斷兩個題型的考查，是一篇教育類閱讀，考生需要準確掌握細節(jié)信息，并根據(jù)上下文進行邏輯推理，從而選出正確答案。根據(jù)第三段中的“It(指poetry) also deserves a place in the teaching of language and literature more central than it presently occupies”告訴我們在語言和文學(xué)教學(xué)中,詩歌本應(yīng)該獲得比目前更加重要的位置,即詩歌教學(xué)本該得到更多的重視。故選A。interpretation39。 （2）考查細節(jié)理解。t time for both”可知,如果課堂上沒有時間同時朗讀和分析詩歌的話,把時間花在朗讀上比花在分析上要值得多,因此“分析詩歌”是可選擇的的。analyzing39。 （1）考查推理判斷。The teaching of poetry should have been much more stressed.D.The most important teaching goal is to have students read and recite every poem they learn.B.D.easily arouses some discussion among the studentsC.is the best way to understand itD.an approach to understanding itB.not essential at all I am not saying that every English teacher must teach poetry. Those who don39。 I have e to think, in fact, that time spent reading a poem aloud is much more important than analyzing it, if there isn39。interpretation39。 No poem should ever be discussed or analyzed, until it has been read aloud by someone, teacher or student. Better still, perhaps, is the practice of reading it twice, once at the beginning of the discussion and once at the end, so the sound of the poem is the last thing one hears of it.【點評】本題考點涉及細節(jié)理解，推理判斷測和主旨大意三個題型的考查，是一篇科普類閱讀，要求考生在捕捉細節(jié)信息的基礎(chǔ)上，進一步根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進行分析，推理，概括和歸納，從而選出正確答案。根據(jù)主題段第一段可知人們對于人工智能，尤其是機器人的迅速發(fā)展持有謹慎的態(tài)度，認為人工智能的過快發(fā)展會影響到人類的未來。故選A。根據(jù)第五段中的“It39。故選D。（2）考查細節(jié)理解。因為比爾蓋茨是一個名人，他的觀點更有說服力，所以作者才會引用他說的話，讓別人更加相信他的觀點。Asimov為此制定了三條機器人規(guī)則，作者旨在引起人們對智能機器人的關(guān)注。D.The new applications of robots.C.Regretful（4）What does the text mainly focus on? A.C.Worrieds rules of robotics? A.D.it would take over the worldC.more interesting（2）An intelligent paperclip machine would harm us because _______. A.betterorganizedmore persuasivebetterknownt create an appliance which wants to take over the world!（1）The author quoted Bill Gates39。m glad my machines at home are dumb. All my cleaner wants to take over is the carpet in my living room. Let39。s a good thing that American writer Isaac Asimov thought about how far robots can go and left us his three rules of robotics. They state that a robot may not hurt a human being or allow the human being to e to harm.s what philosopher Nick Bostrom from Oxford University believes. He says that machines are indifferent to humans and in pursuit of their own goals，the destruction of people might be just additional damage. Bostrom gives us an example: A machine which might have its only goal to produce as many paperclips as possible might look at human bodies as extra material for paperclips and go after you. Because it is, well, a machine, it would not take pity on you. Maybe the problem with puters too clever for us is not that they are evil like some we39。t have to worry about my puter and kitchen equipment yet. After I use them I can always pull the plug. But in the future, machines might find a way to prevent us from switching them off. There39。 Gates said in an interview with the social networking and news website Reddit: I am in the camp that is concerned about super intelligence. First the machines will do a lot of jobs for us and not be super intelligent．That should be positive if we manage well. A few decades after that, though, the intelligence is strong enough to be a concern.（英語）高三英語閱讀理解專項訓(xùn)練100(附答案)一、高中英語閱讀理解1．閱讀理解 Robots make me nervous—especially the ones which seem to think for themselves. I was embarrassed to admit this till I heard that Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, felt the same way. Well, maybe I don39。s a terrible thought!ve seen in scifi movies. What could put us in danger is that they might be too efficient. That39。 It39。 I39。s hope they don39。 words in Paragraph 2 in order to make the text________. A.B.C.D.it is much cleverer than usB.it has the strong feeling of destroying usit would see us just as material（3）How does the author feel about Isaac Asimov39。OptimisticB.DisappointedD.The benefits of future robots.B.The concern for super intelligence.The popularity of robots in the future.【答案】（1）B（2）D（3）A（4）C 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇說明文，介紹了智能機器人可能給人類帶來傷害以及美國作家Isaac（1）考查推理判斷。故選B。根據(jù)第四段中的“A machine which might have its only goal to produce as many paperclips as possible might look at human bodies as extra material for paperclips and go after you.”可知智能的paperclip machine會把人類當成是加工材料而傷害人類。（3）考查推理判斷。s a good thing that American writer Isaac Asimov thought about how far robots can go and left us his three rules of robotics.”可知作者認為Isaac Asimov所制定的機器人規(guī)則是好事情，說明他對此持樂觀的態(tài)度。（4）考查主旨大意。故選C。2．閱讀理解 All discussions of poetry are, in fact, preparations for reading it aloud, and the reading of the poem is, finally, the most telling 39。 of it, suggesting tone, rhythm, and meaning all at once. Hearing a poet read the work in his or her own voice, on records or on film, is obviously a special reward. But even those aids to teaching cannot replace the student and teacher reading it or, best of all, reciting it.t time for both. I think one of our goals as teachers of English is to have students love poetry. Poetry is a criticism of life, a heightening of life, enjoyment with others. It is an approach to the truth of feeling, and it can save your life. It also deserves a place in the teaching of language and literature more central than it presently occupies.t like it should not be forced to put that dislike on anyone else. But those who do teach poetry must keep in mind a few things about its essential nature, about its sound as well as its sense, and they must make room in the classroom for hearing poetry as well as thinking about it.（1）The passage indicates that analyzing a poem is . A.a preparation for appreciating itC.optional in class