【正文】 過開展名牌專業(yè)建設(shè)工作，切實推進(jìn)教育創(chuàng)新，建立適應(yīng)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟與社會發(fā)展要求的、有較強競爭力的學(xué)科專業(yè)，形成自身的辦學(xué)特色和優(yōu)勢。s judgment ultimate consumer economic loss amp。For those two points, both are duties that employees should have done which may prevent the some distance, for their omissions Rose had a the other hand, after the car crash, medical equipment fell from the ambulance hitting Rose in the head causing a severe the high speed driving, it’s normal to have a , for ambulance center, they should have a sense of fastening equipment in the this case, obviously, they breach their the crash happened, Rose had to be transported by another ambulance to a hospital causing a delay in treatment which may lead a nervous shock to Rose for a primary victim, and should be considered in the above may not only the medical employees liable, but the Ambulance Service might also be liable for failing to properly supervise and train their , there may be a liability of another driver failed to observe the right of way of an emergency vehicle and thereby caused the ambulance wreck in the first ambulance center is liable for Rose’s injury in car crash(another car in the accident)is liable for Rose’s delay of two IssueCould Jenny successfully claim all losses including price of Barbie doll, other property damages and medical cost from Supertoy Company? Consumer Protection Act 1987(1)Strict liability: only prove causal link between the defendant’s tortious behavior and the damage suffered.(2)Potential claimant: any person hurt, or suffered damage from defective goods.(3)Methods of supply: including gift.(4)Potential defendants producer supplier(5)Defective means dangerous: packaging and any warnings or instructions normal uses of the product time when the product was issued (1)The duty of care.[Barnett v Packer(1940)][Stennett v Hancock(1939)](2)The defendant failed to perform that duty(3)As a result, the claimant suffered damage.(4)The scope and influence of Lord Atkin161。第二篇：北師大珠海分校商業(yè)法考試標(biāo)準(zhǔn)答案Case one IssueWas the ambulance center liable for Rose’s injury in car crash and delay of treatment? Rules— liability(1)The duty of care.[Barnett v Packer(1940)][Stennett v Hancock(1939)](2)The defendant failed to perform that duty(3)As a result, the claimant suffered to act: “false omissions” in situation with duty of care between parties.(1)Act is part of chain of events.(2)The claimant in a dependent relationship with authorities and statutory discretion: Public service providers operate in the context of statutory duties and duties are mandatory but often widely drafted, leaving a large element of discretion to the authority about how it is shock(1)Primary victim(2)Secondary victim ApplicationsIn daily life, emergency personnel have state immunity for ambulance accidents like happened in the , when they have negligence in their duties, they are the case, when the ambulance center’ employees arrived at Rose’s home, they hand a duty of definitely, they had a close relationship that ambulance center’ employees performed their duties negligently that after.(1)The medical employees didn’t secure Rose to the portable bed。二是建立教師與家長、社區(qū)工作者密切聯(lián)絡(luò)，學(xué)校與家庭、社區(qū)經(jīng)常溝通的渠道，整合社會和行業(yè)系統(tǒng)資源，調(diào)動工會、共青團、婦聯(lián)及各類社會組織力量，在引導(dǎo)社會參與學(xué)校管理監(jiān)督基礎(chǔ)上，讓家長和社會承擔(dān)起加強青少年德育的應(yīng)盡責(zé)任。加強青少年思想道德教育工作是全黨全社會的共同任務(wù)，學(xué)校德育體系建設(shè)不僅要全面覆蓋、橫向滲透，更要內(nèi)外銜接，讓德育貫穿學(xué)校教育、家庭教育、社會教育各個方面。從德育覆蓋領(lǐng)域看，應(yīng)整體推進(jìn)未成年人思想道德建設(shè)和大學(xué)生思想政治教育工作，在中小學(xué)全面整合德育資源，改進(jìn)德育方法和形式；在高等學(xué)校重點加強思想政治教育的學(xué)科建設(shè)、課程教材建設(shè)和教師隊伍建設(shè)。從小學(xué)12年級起，開設(shè)《品德與生活》，36年級開設(shè) 《品德與社會》，重在品德啟蒙教育和行為養(yǎng)成教育；初中開設(shè)《思想品德》，重在良好品德教育、健康人格教育和公民意識教育；高中開設(shè)《思想政治》，重在中國特色社會主義理論基本常識教育和世界觀、人生觀、價值觀教育；高等學(xué)校開設(shè)《馬克思主義基本原理》、《毛澤東思想、鄧小平理論和“三個代表”重要思想概論》、《中國近現(xiàn)代史綱要》和《思想道德修養(yǎng)與法律基礎(chǔ)》等課程，深入進(jìn)行社會主義核心價值體系教育。我個人認(rèn)為這種邏輯是有很大缺陷的。只要缺乏環(huán)境的監(jiān)督，就是無效的。一部分人遵守道德只是害怕懲罰。在道德中，冒險，投機，計算是很多的。如果他發(fā)明了對付考試更高明的方式，他可能去算。作弊是中國教育界的第一惡行。我個人的說法覺得這種善行不帶有善性。但他們這樣做的目的是為了追求利益。那個行為本身是好的。利益的追逐戰(zhàn)勝了道德的良知。有一次我看到一個報道，城里人還能吃什么？這個是用色素染的等等。但是反過來，為了追求利益，我就不講道德。其實在生活中，那些從來不管用，但是已經(jīng)成為家長的普遍道德信念?，F(xiàn)在社會上形成了一種看法，講道德的人吃虧。這個問題是公開的道德與私下的敗德。抓住以后一個兩個都說沒有問題，證據(jù)出示以后百般求饒。一個謊言需要更多的謊言來支持。這是中國現(xiàn)實中一種相當(dāng)普遍嚴(yán)峻的道德現(xiàn)象。我們有時候在表面的道德背后，有多少敗德的行為，道德的大廈是建立在流沙之上。那些被揭露出有問題的人，比如馬列教授露題，還有教授每到美國去一次就換一次妻子。為什么，因為你講道德是會受到獎勵的。這種價值邏輯的缺陷究竟給我們的道德教育道德生活帶來什么樣的后果？我想是不是有下面幾方面的后果：第一是公開的道德與私下的敗德。比如一個德育老師講，道德是一種文化資本，社會資本。有人說道德是最大人的最大幸福。更為一般的倫理學(xué)看，善一定有善報，惡一定有惡報嗎？這只是民眾的道德期待，可是在現(xiàn)實生活里有時候是好人不長命，壞人活千年。所以現(xiàn)在有人救人的時候看看旁邊有沒有記者。實際上他和前面的分析是一致的。有的時候你主持公道可能遭到報復(fù)。這在現(xiàn)實生活中行不通，他有另一種可能。誠實一定會受到獎勵嗎？我們說了許多誠實的故事，這些人總會被人們懷念，但是現(xiàn)實生活中是這樣的嗎？有時候你講了實話，你不但得不到獎勵，你還得到了懲罰。作弊一定會受到處分嗎？弄虛作假一定會受到懲罰嗎？經(jīng)驗世界里不認(rèn)同這個邏輯。第一，撒謊一定會受到懲罰嗎？那個孩子差點被狼咬死了。這個邏輯實際是現(xiàn)實道德邏輯的心理基礎(chǔ)。這個取向