國(guó)家責(zé)任法ppt課件(2)-文庫(kù)吧資料
2025-05-12 22:06本頁(yè)面
【正文】 epts that general international law does not recognize the criminal responsibility of States. The Court observes that the obligations in question in this case, arising from the terms of the Convention, and the responsibilities of States that would arise from breach of such obligations, are obligations and responsibilities under international law. They are not of a criminal nature. 二、危險(xiǎn)活動(dòng)所致越界損害的國(guó)際賠償責(zé)任 (international liability) 的條款草案 □ 預(yù)防、合作義務(wù) 案件中損失分擔(dān)的原則草案 □ 損害 □ 損失分擔(dān)原則 參考書 賀其治： 《 國(guó)家責(zé)任法及案例淺析 》 ，法律出版社， 2022年。布某因拒捕被擊斃。根據(jù)國(guó)際法的有關(guān)規(guī)則，下列對(duì)此事件的哪些判斷是正確的？ A．該哄搶行為可以直接視為乙國(guó)的國(guó)家行為
教學(xué)課件相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1