【正文】 d, the judgment right is always in original authorities which will be hard to deny the rules and byelaws what they constituted. In addition, most countries adopt the judicial review system to treat the abstract administrative behavior by the mode of inefficacy or nonexistence, but this system in Chinese Antimonopoly Law is deficient, so the illegal behaviors of administrative subject is hard to be redressed. 3. Perfection of administrative monopoly regulation in Chinese Antimonopoly LawAbove aspects about the legal regulation for the administrative monopoly in Chinese Antimonopoly Law all need to be perfected and simple opinions are offered as follows. Using foreign mature experiences as references and increasing the operation feature of Chinese Antimonopoly Law Law enforcement should be executed according to laws, and that means the clear description of legal concepts is the premise to exactly enforce laws, and the specific description of legal rules is the base to enforce laws strictly, but the problems about administrative monopoly in Chinese Antimonopoly are very plex, and some legal concepts have not been defined, and detailed legal standards and concrete legal responsibility should be further confirmed. Therefore, the content of the chapter 5 in Chinese Antimonopoly Law can be regarded as the principled legal rules to regulate administrative monopoly, and the explanation of general principles is a plex and hard task, just as when US modified the transverse merger directory in the Antimonopoly Law, it added the word of “efficiency judgment”, and the American Competition Bureau used 13000 words to explain it. It is necessary to explain the criterion of general rules, and only to constitute suited rules as soon as possibly, and explain the principled articles in detail, the operation character of Chinese Antimonopoly Law can be added, and the uniform law enforcement standards can be established to effectively regulate the administrative monopoly behaviors by law. Establishing various administrative monopoly legal responsibility systems The past laws in China only regulated administrative monopoly by administrative responsibility, but ignored the function of civil responsibility and criminal responsibility. To more effectively regulate administrative monopoly, the particularity of administrative monopoly should be considered fully, and constitute prehensive legal responsibilities including administrative responsibility, civil responsibility and criminal responsibility according to the principle of legal responsibility, proper responsibility and own responsibility. When maintaining special petitors’ benefits, the behavior of administrative monopoly harms other petitors’ petition right at the same time, and it belongs to a kind of tort, and it should assume corresponding civil responsibility, and though the administrative responsibility includes the system of administrative pensation, but the range of administrative pensation is limited, and it doesn’t include the administrative pensation. And to better protect relative parties’ legal rights, Chinese Antimonopoly Law should specially regulate that victims of administrative monopoly have rights to institute civil actions, and obtain corresponding civil damages. At the same time, the behavior of administrative monopoly has large social harm, and it should be adjusted by the criminal law when it seriously harms the society, and furthermore, the social harm extent achieved by administrative monopoly is far bigger than some economic crimes and occupational Journal of Politics and Law December, 202075crimes regulated in current criminal laws, so the measure of criminal punishment is necessary to be adopted. Confirming independent antimonopoly law enforcement institutions and perfect the law enforcement system The legal construction in China is to solve practical problems in the final analysis, and the setup of antimonopoly law enforcement institution is not exceptional. Except to solve economic monopoly, Chinese antimonopoly law enforcement institution should treat more plex issues of administrative monopoly. And as the socialism country where the market economy system was established initially, Chinese political economy system has its own peculiarity, so the setup of antimonopoly law enforcement institution must be linked with Chinese politics, economy and legal system, and only in this way, the “rejection reaction” of system “grafting” can be overcame effectively, and when designing one system, advanced experiences and national situations can not be ignored (Liu, 2020, ). The antimonopoly law enforcement institution should be highly independent. To keep the independent is the life line of antimonopoly law enforcement institution, and the meanin