【正文】
ARGUMENT 模板: In this argument, the arguer claims that +作者觀點(diǎn), because+作者論據(jù) . At first glance, the arguer’s argument appears to be somehow appealing. After all, to some extent總結(jié)概括其中的好處或道理 . Careful scrutiny, however, will reveal that it is problematic in following reasons. The main problem with this argument is the conclusion is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that A is analogous to B, but he does not provide any evidence that all things are indeed parable and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. It is true that both A and B have some mon ground such as the neighboring geographical location, but even here there probably exist essential differences: 舉幾個(gè)區(qū)別 and so on. Therefore, there is no guarantee that the facts drawn from A are applicable to B. (錯(cuò)誤類比 ) Another flaw that weakens the logic of the argument is that the arguer concludes that +實(shí)行的措施或什么現(xiàn)象 which were 以前怎樣 in the past will also be 現(xiàn)在怎樣 in the future rests on the poor assumption that during +時(shí)間 all conditions upon which their effectiveness depends have remained unchanged. Perhaps+可能發(fā)生的變化 .+及其因此帶來的結(jié)果 . Accordingly, 作者的做法或想法不一定能帶來想要的結(jié)果。 (過去不能推斷將來) Before I e to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out another fault that it rests on a gratuitous assumption that+作者的假設(shè) . However, the assumption is questionable because the arguer provides no evidence to support this argument. It is likely that +列舉他因 . It is also likely that +列舉他因 . Moreover, it is also likely that+列舉他因 . Any of scenarios, if true, would show that the assumption +作者的假設(shè) is un w