【正文】 這項工作還有助于強調一點，就是業(yè)主的要求越來越高，挑剔越來越多，并不太愿意接受沒有賠償的風險。這意味著，設計師不能利用供應商或承包商的房建能力或 維護要求以及影響可持續(xù)性、總成本 ,或健康和安全知識。 在項目里每一方單獨投保存在類似的問題。每個人都必須提供最好地項目。在完成合同文件之間 允許項目管理者讓分包商投標或提供建議，最高保證價格（ GMP），從而降低了建設管理者的風險，并提供有益的投入設計。 建設風險管理（簡稱 CM at Risk），與建立工程承包私營部門的方法類似，很受公共部門的歡迎。 據說這則一般的結構化方法，可以適用于任何建設工程，以增加參與者的認識。 據指出，以統(tǒng)計方法為基礎的分析技術應廣泛應用在決策制定上。而且，以確保正確的問題被問和主要風險被鑒定。根據 Hinchey，對一個特定的項目，理想的心態(tài)的當事人及其代表者，首先在有意的關于工程項目風險識別中，然后是在發(fā)展系統(tǒng)和理解的過程中，通過合同避免，緩解，管理和最終分配這些風險的最佳方式。用總風險排除的最大目標， 會增加減輕風險的概率。 相反，它帶來額外的好處，幫助澄清了目標，確定了不確定性的性質，介紹了有效的溝通制度，提高了決策，介紹了有效的風險控制措施，保障了項目目標和提供了風險教訓知識。 所有建設工程都在一定程度上暗示原型和改變。 經驗表明，一個工程的參與者以自己的經驗為基礎也能夠很好的識別出風險。此項分析調查了工程管理的作用和建設專業(yè)人士在預防 /緩解潛在的建設問題中發(fā)揮的重要作用 。 所有當事人都已檢查了這個事實，并且在他們證明之前，很明顯有一個很大的可能那就是法院也許裁定建筑師和施工方都有責任。 起初津巴布韋標準協(xié)會總部決定去仲裁 , 但未能產生一個即時的解決辦法 。津巴布韋標準協(xié)會總部實際接受了對沒有占有證書的總部房屋的占有。 關鍵詞 ： 仲裁，索賠，建設，合同，訴訟，工程和風險 加強的混凝土構件的結構設計由 KP 咨詢工程師設計。 原告有理由對承包者和建筑師雙方帶來的疏忽索賠看來是合乎情理的。特別是，它審查了建設專業(yè)隊伍發(fā)揮的事先作用。 produce a more manageable, predictable project。 Bath (HLB). The contract was awarded to Central African Building Corporation (CABCO) who was also responsible for the provision of a specialist roof structure using patented “gang nail” roof trusses. The building construction proceeded to pletion and was handed over to the owners on Sept. 12, 1991. The SAZ took effective occupation of the headquarters building without a certificate of occupation. Also, the defects liability period was only three months. The roof structure was in place 10 years before partial failure in December 1999. The building insurance coverage did not cover enough, the City of Harare, a 2 government municipality, issued the certificate of occupation 10 years after occupation, and after partial collapse of the roof. At first the SAZ decided to go to arbitration, but this failed to yield an immediate solution. The SAZ then decided to proceed to litigate in court and to bring a negligence claim against CABCO. The preparation for arbitration was reused for litigation. The SAZ?s quantified losses stood at approximately $ 6 million in Zimbabwe dollars (US $). After all parties had examined the facts and evidence before them, it became clear that there was a great probability that the courts might rule that both the architects and the contractor were liable. It was at this stage that the defendants? lawyers requested that the matter be settled out of court. The plaintiff agreed to this suggestion, with the terms of the settlement kept confidential. The aim of this critical analysis was to analyse the issues surrounding the partial collapse of the roof of the building housing the HQ of Standard Association of Zimbabwe. It examined the prior roles played by the project management function and construction professionals in preventing/mitigating potential construction problems. It further assessed the extent to which the employer/client and parties to a construction contract are able to recover damages under that contract. The main objective of this critical analysis was to identify an effective risk management strategy for future construction projects. The importance of this study is its multidimensional examination approach. Experience suggests that participants in a project are well able to identify risks based on their own experience. The adoption of a risk management approach, based solely in past experience and dependant on judgment, may work reasonably well in a stable low risk environment. It is unlikely to be effective where there is a change