【正文】 tents 評估技術(shù)建議書 － 評估內(nèi)容 ? Firm’s experience 公司經(jīng)驗(yàn) ? Methodology 方法 ? Work program 工作計(jì)劃 ? Personnel schedule 人員配置 ? Innovation 創(chuàng)新性 ? Presentation 表達(dá) ? Personnel 人員 ? Employment status 雇用狀態(tài) – points for regular full time staff of the firm 對該公司的全職職員 ? Certification 證書 – the expert or an authorized senior officer of the firm must sign the statement of certification (format provided in the RFP) 證書必須由專家或經(jīng)該公司授權(quán)的高級官員簽字 – if an officer signs and the firm is selected, the expert must still sign before the negotiations 如果某官員已簽字且該公司被選中，咨詢專家仍然必須在談判之前簽字 42 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 5. Evaluating Technical Proposals Non responsive proposals 未做出響應(yīng)的建議書 ? The lead firm or an associate is associated with a contractor/supplier/manufacturer and didn’t make the required statement 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位的公司或者合營的公司是承包商 /供貨商 /制造商合伙人，并且未做出所要求的陳述 ? The lead firm or an associate is not registered in an ADB member country 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位的公司或者合營的公司不是在亞行成員國注冊 ? Submission of wrong type of technical proposal 呈交的技術(shù)建議書的類型錯(cuò)誤 ? The technical proposal includes costs 技術(shù)建議書包含成本 ? The technical and financial proposals are not in separate sealed and marked envelopes 技術(shù)建議書和財(cái)務(wù)建議書未分置在不同的密封且蓋章的信封里 ? Receipt of proposals after the deadline 呈交建議書時(shí)間超過了期限 43 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBSPublic opening 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書－公開開封 44 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBS procedure 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書 Checks for: 檢查： ? Commercial pliance 符合商務(wù)條款 ? Accurate arithmetic 準(zhǔn)確的計(jì)算 ? Consistent with technical proposals 符合技術(shù)建議書 Adjustments 調(diào)整 Scoring 打分 45 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBS procedure 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書 Checks for: 檢查： ? Commercial pliance 符合商務(wù)條款 ? Accurate arithmetic 準(zhǔn)確的計(jì)算 ? Consistent with technical proposals 符合技術(shù)建議書 Adjustments 調(diào)整 Scoring 打分 ? Consistent with the requirements in the RFP or data sheet? 與 RFP或基本數(shù)據(jù)單的要求一致？ – validity period 有效期 ? No conditions or restrictions? 沒有條件或限制？ ? Total price within the budget? 總價(jià)格在預(yù)算內(nèi)？ 46 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBS procedure 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書 Checks for: 檢查： ? Commercial pliance 符合商務(wù)條款 ? Accurate arithmetic 準(zhǔn)確的計(jì)算 ? Consistent with technical proposals 符合技術(shù)建議書 Adjustments 調(diào)整 Scoring 打分 ? Checks the arithmetic， makes necessary corrections 算數(shù)檢查，并做必要的糾正 ? Provisional sums and contingency the same as in the data sheet? 暫列金額和不可預(yù)見費(fèi)與數(shù)據(jù)單中所列相同？ 47 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBS procedure 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書 Checks for: 檢查： ? Commercial pliance 符合商務(wù)條款 ? Accurate arithmetic 準(zhǔn)確的計(jì)算 ? Consistent with technical proposals 符合技術(shù)建議書 Adjustments 調(diào)整 Scoring 打分 ? Checks consistency with the firm’s technical proposal， makes necessary corrections 檢查是否與技術(shù)建議書一致，并做必要的糾正 48 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBS procedure 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書 Checks for: 檢查： ? Commercial pliance 符合商務(wù)條款 ? Accurate arithmetic 準(zhǔn)確的計(jì)算 ? Consistent with technical proposals 符合技術(shù)建議書 Adjustments 調(diào)整 Scoring 打分 ? Make adjustments and corrections in the manner described in the RFP 按照 RFP中的規(guī)定進(jìn)行調(diào)整和糾正 ? Must not introduce factors not mentioned in the RFP 不允許引入在 RFP中未提及的考慮因素 49 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal QCBS procedure 評估財(cái)務(wù)建議書 Checks for: 檢查： ? Commercial pliance 符合商務(wù)條款 ? Accurate arithmetic 準(zhǔn)確的計(jì)算 ? Consistent with technical proposals 符合技術(shù)建議書 Adjustments 調(diào)整 Scoring 打分 ? Gives the lowest priced proposal the maximum financial score of 1000 points 給最低標(biāo)價(jià)的建議書以最高的財(cái)務(wù)分?jǐn)?shù) 1000分 ? Calculates scores of the other financial proposals using the formula 其它財(cái)務(wù)建議書的分?jǐn)?shù)用公式計(jì)算： P = (lowest price/price of P) x 1000 (P is the proposal being ranked) 其它建議書價(jià)格 = (最低價(jià)格 /該建議書價(jià)格 ) x 1000 50 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 6. Evaluating Financial Proposal Final ranking 最終排名 Final scores = 80% technical + 20% financial 最終分?jǐn)?shù)＝ 80％技術(shù)＋ 20％財(cái)務(wù) Submission of Evaluation and Ranking Report for ADB’s Approval 向亞行提交評估及排名報(bào)告 – Details of technical and financial proposals 技術(shù)建議書和財(cái)務(wù)建議書細(xì)節(jié) – Technical evaluation 技術(shù)評估 – Financial evaluation 財(cái)務(wù)評估 – Ranking of proposal 建議書排名 – EA’s remendation 執(zhí)行機(jī)構(gòu)的建議 51 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 7. Contract Negotiations 合同談判 Forms of Contract: 合同格式 – Timebased Contracts 基于時(shí)間的合同 – Lump Sum Contracts 總價(jià)合同 – Other Contracts 其它類型的合同 Contract Components 合同構(gòu)件 ? Agreement 協(xié)議書 ? General Conditions 通用條款 ? Appendix A TOR 任務(wù)大綱 ? Appendix B staffing schedule 人員配置計(jì)劃 ? Appendix C cost estimate 估價(jià) ? Appendix D specific assurances 特定的保證 52 ADB PRCM Jiang H. (hjiangadrg) 7. Contract Negotiations 合同談判QCBS technical 技術(shù)方面 ? Finalize the technical details 完成技術(shù)細(xì)節(jié) – TOR 任務(wù)大綱 – timing of work 工作時(shí)間表 – counterpart facilities 對應(yīng)的設(shè)施 ? QCBS negotiators mus