【正文】 sufficient time examining outside the classroom. Admittedly, consumerism arid advertising may be appropriate topics for collegelevel marketing and psychology courses. However, undue focus on media and materialism may give younger students a distortedly narrow view of the world as little more than a flea market. Additionally, revealing the deceptive side of the advertising business may breed unhealthy cynicism among youngsters, who need positive messages。 not negative ones during their formative years.　　In sum, the premise that highquality ads tout lowquality products is specious at best. In any event, for schools to provide extensive training in consumerism would be to assign them an inappropriate role and to foster in impressionable minds a distortedly narrow and unhealthy view of the world.法學(xué)院入學(xué)考試(LSAT)范文集錦12　　Because businesses use highquality advertising to sell lowquality products, schools should give students extensive training in how to make informed decisions before making purchases. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.(GRE無類似題目)　　Some people claim that since highquality ads are used to promote lowquality products, schools should teach students about consumerism. In my opinion, undue attention by schools to consumerism is [unnecessary and inappropriate, especially for younger students.　　Regarding the first reason, empirical evidence does not suggest that highquality advertising is used to remote lowquality products. To the contrary, panies that produce lowquality products seem to osort to lowbudget, poorquality ads, especially in broadcast media. Firms that take pride in the quality of their products are far more likely also to produce ads they can be proud of. Furthermore, highquality products are more likely to succeed in the marketplace and thereby generate the revenues needed to ensure high production value in advertising.　　As for the second reason, it is not the job of our schools to breed legions of smart shoppers. Teachers should devote class time to examining the marketplace of ideas, not that of consumer goods and services, which students spend sufficient time examining outside the classroom. Admittedly, consumerism arid advertising may be appropriate topics for collegelevel marketing and psychology courses. However, undue focus on media and materialism may give younger students a distortedly narrow view of the world as little more than a flea market. Additionally, revealing the deceptive side of the advertising business may breed unhealthy cynicism among youngsters, who need positive messages。 not negative ones during their formative years.　　In sum, the premise that highquality ads tout lowquality products is specious at best. In any event, for schools to provide extensive training in consumerism would be to assign them an inappropriate role and to foster in impressionable minds a distortedly narrow and unhealthy view of the world.法學(xué)院入學(xué)考試(LSAT)范文集錦13People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform. 　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. （少數(shù)和多數(shù)之以身作則）　　People are more likely to accept the leadership of those who have shown they can perform the same tasks they require of others. My reasons for this view involve the notions of respect and trust. It is difficult for people to fully respect a leader who cannot, or will not, do what he or she asks of others. President Clinton39。s difficulty in his role as CommanderinChief serves as a fitting and very public example. When Clinton assumed this leadership position, it was wellknown that he had evaded military service during the Vietnam conflict. Military leaders and lowerlevel personnel alike made it clear that they did not respect his leadership as a result. Contrast the Clinton case with that of a business leader such as John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, who by way of his training and experience as a puter engineer earned the respect of his employees.　　It is likewise difficult to trust leaders who do not have experience in the areas under their leadership. The Clinton example illustrates this point as well. Because President Clinton lacked military experience, people in the armed forces found it difficult to trust that his policies would reflect any understanding of their interests or needs. And when put to the lest. He undermined their trust to an even greater extent with his naive and largely bungled attempt to solve the problem of gays in the military. In stark contrast, President Dwight Eisenhower inspired nearly devotional trust as well as respect because of his role as a military hero in World War II. In conclusion, it will always be difficult for people to accept leaders who lack demonstrated ability in the areas under their leadership. Initially, such leaders will be regarded as outsiders, and treated Accordingly. Moreover, some may never achieve the insider status that inspires respect and trust from those they hope to lead.法學(xué)院入學(xué)考試(LSAT)范文集錦14　　Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most mitment and energy, who gets things done. 　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (個(gè)體和整體)　　The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and mitment is plex。 whether they operate in a plementary or antagonistic manner depends on: (1) the goals toward which the traits are directed, (