【正文】 tens to contaminate local groundwater. While the pany may favor an inexpensive containment program, munity leaders may want the pany to go further by cleaning up and restoring their environmenteven if the expense will force the pany to leave and take jobs from the munity. Whatever the pany decides, it should not assume that protecting profits automatically outweighs social obligation. In many instances it does not, as highlyvisible tobacco, automobile safety, and asbestos liability cases aptly illustrate. Such examples reveal a limit as to how far a corporation can ethically go in trading off the wellbeing of the munity for the sake of its own profits,　　In sum, corporations have duties both to do well and to do good. Although conflict between these duties is not inevitable, it does occur. Determining which duty takes precedence in time of conflict requires careful consideration of all the ethical ramifications of each alternative.法學(xué)院入學(xué)考試(LSAT)寫作范文集錦7　　In this age of automation, many people plain that humans are being subservient to machines. But, in fact, machines are continually improving our lives. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (技術(shù)進(jìn)步對人類的影響)　　In this age of automation, many people plain that humans are being subservient to machines. In my point of view, in some respects humans serve machines, while in other respects machines serve us by enhancing our lives. While mechanical automation may have diminished our quality of life on balance, digital automation is doing more to improve our lives than to undermine our autonomy.　　Consider first mechanical automation, particularly assemblyline manufacturing. With automation came a loss of pride in and alienation from one39。法學(xué)院入學(xué)考試(LSAT)寫作范文集錦1　　In some countries, television and radio programs are carefully censored for offensive language and behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.　　In your view. To what extent should government or any other group be able to censor television or radio programs? Explain, giving relevant reasons and/or examples to support your position. (技術(shù)進(jìn)步對人類影響)　　The extent to which the broadcast media should be censored for offensive language and behavior involves a conflict between our right as individuals to freely express ourselves and the duty of government to protect its citizenry from potential harm. In my view, our societal interest in preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes precedence over the rights of individuals to broadcast this type of content.　　First of all, I believe that exposure to obscene and offensive language and behavior does indeed cause similar behavior on the part of those who are exposed to it. Although we may not have conclusive scientific evidence of a causeeffect relationship, ample anecdotal evidence establishes a significant correlation. Moreover, both mon sense and our experiences with children inform us that people tend to mimic the language and behavior they are exposed to.　　Secondly, I believe that obscene and offensive behavior is indeed harmful to a society. The harm it produces is, in my view, both palpable and profound. For the individual, it has a debasing impact on vital human relationships。s duties to maximize shareholder wealth and to serve society will at times coincide and at times conflict。 however, philanthropy is alive and well today, especially among the new technology and media moguls.　　Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron. Inadequate resources call for restrictions。 not negative ones during their formative years.　　In sum, the premise that highquality ads tout lowquality products is specious at best. In any event, for schools to provide extensive training in consumerism would be to assign them an inappropriate role and to foster in impressionable minds a distortedly narrow and unhealthy view of the world.法學(xué)院入學(xué)考試(LSAT)范文集錦12　　Because businesses use highquality advertising to sell lowquality products, schools should give students extensive training in how to make informed decisions before making purchases. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.(GRE無類似題目)　　Some people claim that since highquality ads are used to promote lowquality products, schools should teach students about consumerism. In my opinion, undue attention by schools to consumerism is [unnecessary and inappropriate, especially for younger students.　　Regarding the first reason, empirical evidence does not suggest that highquality advertising is used to remote lowquality products. To the contrary, panies that produce lowquality products seem to osort to lowbudget, poorquality ads, especially in broadcast media. Firms that take pride in the quality of their products are far more likely also to produce ads they can be proud of. Furthermore, highquality products are more likely to succeed in the marketplace and thereby generate the revenues needed to ensure high production value in advertising.　　As for the second reason, it is not the job of our schools to breed legions of smart shoppers. Teachers should devote class time to examining the marketplace of ideas, not that of consumer goods and services, which students spend sufficient time examining outside the classroom. Admittedly, consumerism arid advertising may be appropriate topics for collegelevel marketing and psychology courses. However, undue focus on media and materialism may give younger students a distortedly narrow view of the world as little more than a flea market. Additionally, revealing the deceptive side of the advertising business may breed unhealthy cynicism among youngsters, who need positive messages