【正文】
尊重,英文叫做給別人的工作credits.所以文章不要出現(xiàn)非常negative的評價,比如Their resultsare wrong, very questionable, have no mensence, etc.遇到這類情況,可以婉轉(zhuǎn)地提出:Their studies may be more reasonable if they hadconsidered this situation.Their results could be better convinced if they ...Or Their conclusion may remain some uncertanties. 討論部份還包括什么內(nèi)容?1. 主要數(shù)據(jù)特征的總結2. 主要結論以及與前人觀點的對比3. 本文的不足第三點,在一般作者看來不可取。事實上給出文章的不足恰恰是保護自己文章的重要手段。如果刻意隱藏文章的漏洞,覺得別人看不出來,是非常不明智的。所謂不足,包括以下內(nèi)容:1. 研究的問題有點片面討論時一定要說,It should be noted that this study has examined only..We concentrate (focus) on only...We have to point out that we do not..Some limitations of this study are...2. 結論有些不足The results do not imply,The results can not be used to determinebe taken as evidence of Unfortunately, we can not determien this from this dataOur results are lack of ...但是,在指出這些不足之后,隨后一定要再一次加強本文的重要性以及可能采取的手段來解決這些不足,為別人或者自己的下一步研究打下浮筆。Notwithstading its limitation, this tudy does suggest..However, these problems culd be solved if we consdierDespite its preliminary character, this study can clearly indicate..用中文來說,這一部份是左右逢源。把審稿人想到的問題提前給一個交代,同時表明你已經(jīng)在思考這些問題,但是由于文章長度,試驗進度或者試驗手段的制約,暫時不能回答這些問題。但是,這些通過你的一些建議,這些問題在將來的研究中游可能實現(xiàn)。