【導(dǎo)讀】GRE作文包括“觀點(diǎn)陳述”題和“論證辨析”題。題從某一角度表明自己的觀點(diǎn)并進(jìn)行有理有據(jù)的分析論述。專家和通才的關(guān)系，題目認(rèn)為：“專家過多，需要通才”。6個(gè)月前，F(xiàn)orestville地區(qū)提高了本地區(qū)公路上的最高時(shí)速限制，比原先提高了10公里。由于這個(gè)變化的影響，本地區(qū)車禍的數(shù)量提高了15%。但是，Elmsford地區(qū)（和Forestville地。F地區(qū)如果想要減少車禍，就要恢復(fù)到原來的最高時(shí)速限制。Argument就是對上面的論證，找漏洞，然后反駁它。致F地區(qū)路上的車輛多了而造成事故增加，而不是由于提高限速。不安全的時(shí)間駕車外出。以后的GRE考試，你的作文就會和你的申請資料一起寄到你要申請的學(xué)校教授的面前。的重要性，不言而喻。究，寫出符合ETS標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的作文。猴哥認(rèn)為，這個(gè)要求可以分三部分內(nèi)容。具體如下：括號內(nèi)為ets6分作文的要求。文章的內(nèi)容，是審題后第一個(gè)要考慮的事情。準(zhǔn)確的運(yùn)用語言，

　　

【正文】 ralists, society bees inwardlooking and eventually inefficient. Without a society that recognizes the importance of broadmindedness and fora a for sharing generalities, individuals bee 15 isolated. Thus, while our form of society necessitates specialists, generalists are equally important. Specialists drive us forward in a series of thrusts while generalists make sure we are still on the jousting field and know what the stakes are. 句型收獲： Without generalists, society bees inwardlooking and eventually inefficient. Without a society that recognizes the importance of broadmindedness and fora a for sharing generalities, individuals bee isolated. Thus, while our form of society necessitates specialists, generalists are equally important. 本文結(jié)構(gòu)的分析： 分段：題會文章的結(jié)構(gòu)，給自己以后寫作，打下良好的結(jié)構(gòu)感基礎(chǔ)。 第一大段：（第一自然段）提出觀點(diǎn)：隨著社會的發(fā)展，需要在專家和通才中尋找一種平衡。 第二大段：（第 3 自然段） 專家是必要的。 第三大段：（第 6 自然段）過度專業(yè)化的危害， 3 個(gè)。 第四大段：（第 7 自然段）沒有專家不行，沒有通才也不行。 Reader Comment on 6 ETS 的評價(jià)，可以看出 ，他們判分，是從前面我們注意的三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行的。 文章內(nèi)容（完整性，觀點(diǎn)明確，論證充足。多舉例子） 文章結(jié)構(gòu)（條理性， 文章文采（句子多樣性） This outstanding response displays insightful analysis, meticulous development, impressive vocabulary and a mastery of the elements of effective writing. The writer disagrees with the stated opinions by arguing that specialists and generalists are both vital: specialists prevent us from being bogged down in the Sargasso sea of information overload, while generalists provide help to see the big picture and, unlike specialists, protect our greater good. 這些都是內(nèi)容描述的完整性的評價(jià) The essay is carefully constructed throughout, enabling the reader to move effortlessly from point to point as the writer examines the multifaceted implications of the issue and provides pelling reasons and examples to support the premise and take the argument to an effective 、文章結(jié)構(gòu)的條理性。 Although other 6 responses may not be as eloquent as this essay, they nevertheless all display the test taker39。s ability to articulate plex ideas effectively and precisely. 文采流暢。 4． 3 Argument 主題閱讀法范例 16 Six months ago the region of Forestville increased the speed limit for vehicles traveling on the region39。s highways by ten miles per hour. Since that change took effect, the number of automobile accidents in that region has increased by 15 percent. But the speed limit in Elmsford, a region neighboring Forestville, remained unchanged, and automobile accidents declined slightly during the same sixmonth period. Therefore, if the citizens of Forestville want to reduce the number of automobile accidents on the region39。s highways, they should campaign to reduce Forestville39。s speed limit to what it was before the increase. 翻譯： 6 個(gè)月前， Forestville 地區(qū)提高了本地區(qū)公路上的最高時(shí)速限制，比原先提高了 10 公里。 由于這個(gè)變化的影響，本地區(qū)車禍的數(shù)量提高了 15%。但是， Elmsford 地區(qū)（和 Forestville 地區(qū)相鄰）并沒有改變最高時(shí)速限制，它的車禍數(shù)量在同樣的 6 個(gè)月里，反而有少量的減少。因此，如果 Forestville 市民想要減少公路上的車禍數(shù)量，他們應(yīng)該想辦法將本地區(qū)的最高時(shí)速限制減少到改變前的狀態(tài)。 分析題目： 找原題邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系 論據(jù)： F 地區(qū)提高最高時(shí)速限制 10 公里 —————— 〉 車禍發(fā)生率增加 15% E 地區(qū)（和 F 相鄰）沒有提高 —————— 〉 車禍發(fā)生率沒有增加 結(jié)論： F 地區(qū)如果想要減少車禍，就要恢復(fù)到原來的最高時(shí)速限制。 第一段， 說明論點(diǎn)有問題。 歸納論點(diǎn)，準(zhǔn)備發(fā)起進(jìn)攻 The argument is wellpresented, but not thoroughly wellreasoned. By making a parison of the region of Forestville, the town with the higher speed limit and therefore automobile accidents, with the region of Elmsford, an area of a lower speed limit and subsequently fewer accidents, the argument for reducing Forestville39。s speed limits in order to decrease accidents seems logical. 猴哥閱讀式作文備考： 第一意群， The argument is wellpresented, but not thoroughly wellreasoned.（常用開頭句型，記住）。這個(gè)論證說的不錯(cuò)，但是，理由不是完全充分。 第二意群， By making a parison of the region of Forestville, the town with the higher speed limit and therefore automobile accidents, with the region of Elmsford, an area of a lower speed limit and subsequently fewer accidents, the argument for reducing Forestville39。s speed limits in order to decrease accidents seems logical. 常用結(jié)構(gòu)，將題目中的主要論點(diǎn)歸納出來。 第二段：第一輪攻擊 攻擊點(diǎn)：可能有其他原因，造成提高限速后車禍的增加。（不一定是限速引起的）（本段主題句） 論證結(jié)構(gòu)：總 —— 分 —— 總 However, the citizens of Forestville are failing to consider other possible alternatives to the increasing car accidents after the raise in speed limit. Such alternatives may include the fact that there are less reliable cars traveling the roads in Forestville, or that the age bracket of those in Elmsford may be more conducive to driving safely. It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than there are in Elmsford. In addition, the citizens have failed to consider the geographical and physical terrain of the two different areas. Perhaps Forestville39。s highway is in an area of more dangerous curves, sharp turns, or has many 17 intersections or merging points where accidents are more likely to occur. It appears reasonable, therefore, for the citizens to focus on these trouble spots than to reduce the speed in the entire area. Elmsford may be an area of easier driving conditions where accidents are less likely to occur regardless of the speed limit. 第一意群： However, the citizens of Forestville are failing to consider other possible alternatives to the increasing car accidents after the raise in speed limit.（找他因，猴哥邏輯單題無憂中，常用的方法）可能有其他原因，造成提高限速后車禍的增加。（不一定是限速引起的）（本段中心句） 句型收獲： However, the citizens of Forestville are failing to consider other possible alternatives to the increasing car accidents after the raise in speed limit. 第二意群： Such alternatives may include the fact that there are less reliable cars traveling the roads in Forestville, or that the age bracket of those in Elmsford may be more conducive to driving safely. It is possible that there are more younger, inexperienced, or more elderly, unsafe drivers in Forestville than there are in Elmsfo