【正文】 is no single rule that governs the use of geometry. I don’t think one existsamp。quot。.3. Translate the sentences into Chinese.1) He is best known for coining the term fractal to describe phenomena (such as coastlines, snowflakes, mountains and trees) whose patterns repeat themselves at smaller and smaller scales.他主要是因為用分形這個概念來描述（海岸線，雪花，山脈和樹木）等不規(guī)則形狀等現(xiàn)象而聞名于世，這些不規(guī)則形狀在越來越小的規(guī)模上不斷重復(fù)同一模式。2) A closer look reveals that the borders of the set do not form crisp lines but seem to shimmer like flames.如果再仔細(xì)觀察，就可以發(fā)現(xiàn)集的邊界并沒有呈波紋線，而是像火焰一樣閃光。3) Krantz introduced a new element into the debate, however, by stating that the Mandelbrot set amp。quot。was not invented by Mandelbrot but occurs explicitly in the literature a couple of years before the term ‘Mandelbrot set’ was coined.amp。quot。但是，克朗茲在這場辯論中引入了一個新東西，他說曼德布洛特集不是曼德布洛特發(fā)明的，而是早在“曼德布洛特集”這個術(shù)語出現(xiàn)幾年以前就已經(jīng)明確地在數(shù)學(xué)文獻(xiàn)中出現(xiàn)了。4) Mandelbrot also suggested that even if Brooks and Matelski’s publication had preceded his, they still could not be considered discoverers of the set, because they did not appreciate its significance.曼德布洛特同時也暗示即使布魯克斯和馬特爾斯基的論文先于他發(fā)表，但因為他們沒有領(lǐng)會到其價值，仍然不能將他們看作是曼德布洛特集的發(fā)現(xiàn)者。5). In response to Hubbard and Douady’s charge that he is stingy in granting credit, Mandelbrot says he has also been accused of overcitation.對胡巴德和杜阿迪指責(zé)他對論文中材料來源的說明上做得非常少，曼德布洛特回應(yīng)說也有人也指責(zé)過他過分引用別人的成果。4. Translate the sentences into English.1) 他的生活和工作過程正如使他成名的幾何學(xué)一樣，既不是線性的， 也不具備簡單的形狀。Like the geometry that made him famous, neither his life nor the course of his work was linear or simplistic in shape and form2) 曼德布洛特說在隨后的的兩年里他在多個領(lǐng)域中摸索，卻沒有明顯的相聯(lián)系的線索。 Mandelbrot says he spent the next two years groping, exploring first one field and then another, without any clear sense of the connecting thread.3) 更奇怪的是，他發(fā)現(xiàn)噪音周期與清晰傳送周期的比率是恒定的，與用于繪制這個現(xiàn)象10的時間大小無關(guān)。Stranger still, he found that the ratio of periods of noise to periods of clean transmission remained constant, regardless of the scale of time used to plot the phenomenon.4) 通過查詢一直到1900年的記錄，他開始發(fā)現(xiàn)了一個令人驚異的模式，這個模式使他明白了他10年前有關(guān)線路噪聲的研究工作。Using records dating back to 1900, he began to perceive an astonishing pattern —one that hearkened back to his work on line noise a decade earlier.5) 盡管就正常銷售而言，價格變化是無序的，而且沒有人能夠預(yù)測價格變化的準(zhǔn)確數(shù)值，但變化本身卻遵循著與變化幅度相關(guān)的對稱模式。Although price changes were erratic in terms of normal distribution and no one could predict the exact amount of any particular price change, the changes themselves followed a symmetrical pattern with regards to scaling5. Write a summary of the reading passage with at least 150 words.(Open)Part II EST Reading StrategySection B Apply the StrategyNota Bene: Due to the nature of the questions in exercise, it is neither appropriate nor possible to provide one single ―correct answer‖ for the learners. Therefore, the ―answers‖ suggested as follows could be better understood as a general guideline for classroom discussions rather than mandatory criteria for academic performance.Exercise 1It is the judgment from the creator of the exercise that SQ3R could serve the reading needs of the learners well in general. In fact, literature is abundant for discussions around a version of SQ3R specially adapted for reading math texts. However, once again, it might be beneficial for learners and their instructors as well to bear in mind that the choice of SQ3R is by no means mandatory for reading the text in exercise one, nor the ―best‖ option. It is very important for the instructor to tolerate different reading choices, so long as, of course, the choices can be justified in a rational way.However, for instructors and learners working in a somewhat ―orthodox‖ method, following guideline for doing SQ3R in math readings might be useful.1112 Exercise 2One of the suggested ―answers‖ to the practice could be tables. Before we can make a table, we have to know what the rows and columns are going to be. Since the text is essentially a list of the five Platonic solids with information about each one, the table will have a row for each solid, or five rows.What are the columns going to be? To answer this we go back to the text. What kinds of information does it give us about each Platonic solid? It gives us the number of faces, what regular polygon each face is, the number of vertices, the number of faces that meet at each vertex, and the number of edges. That tells us both how many columns we need and what the column heads will be. We need a total of seven columns, one for the name of the solid and one for each piece of information.Now w