【正文】
rds failed to control them the evidence had to be cambric in order to be valid?! t is painful to read these round about accounts today. We have no land ethic yet. (47)but we have at least drawn near the point of admitting that birds should continue as a matter of intrinsic right regardless of the presence of absence of economic advantage to us。 A parallel situation exists in respect of predatory mammals and fisheating birds(48)Time was when biologists somewhat over worded evidence that these creatures preserve the health of game by killing the physically weak or that they prey only on “worthless species”?! ome species of tree have been read out of the party by economic –minded foresters they grow too slowly or have too low a sale vale to pay as imeber crops (49)In Europe, where forestry is ecologically more advanced ,the nonmercial tree species are recognized as members of native forest munity, to be preserved as such, within reason。To sum up, a system of conservation based solely on economic selfinterest is hopelessly lopsided. (50)It tends to ignore, and thus eventually to eliminate, many elements in the land munity that lack mercial value, but that are essential to its healthy functioning. Without the uneconomic pats?! ection III Writing Part A : You are supposed to write for the postgraduate association a notice to recruit volunteers for an international conference on globalization, you should conclude the basic qualification of applicant and the other information you think relative?! ou should write about 100 words. Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use “postgraduate association instead?! art B : Write an essay of 160200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay, you should 1) describe the drawing briefly, 2) explain its intended meaning, and then 3) give your ments。 You should write neatly on ANSHWER SHEET2.(20 points)完型1. [A] affected2. [B] up3. [C] act4. [B] perplexing5. [C] accounts6. [B] matter7. [D] as long as 8. [A] awareness9. [C] enough10. [D] by11. [C] subject12. [A] contrary to13. [A] evidence14. [D] misleading15. [B] for example16. [A] duly17. [D] continued18. [C] However [原文是but, 但根據(jù)考生回憶,考試原文空格后有個(gè)逗號(hào),并且只有however 一個(gè)表轉(zhuǎn)折的詞。(but后不用逗號(hào))]19. [B] tended20. [D] hitting常規(guī)閱讀21. [B] Englishlanguage newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.22. [A] free themes.23. [D] Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.24. [A] His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.25. [D] Prominent Critics in Memory26. [C] the possible restriction on their granting27. [D] It may change the legal practice in the .28. [C] change of attitude29. [B] are often unnecessarily issued30. [A] A looming threat to businessmethod patents31. [B] discuss influentials39。 function in spreading ideas32. [D] requires solid evidence for its validity33. [A] the power of influence goes with social interactions34. [C] are influenced and then influence others35. [C] the readiness to be influenced36. [A] follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules37. [D] the weakening of its independence38. [C] act on their own in rulesetting39. [B] exaggerated the real value of their assets40. [D] sympathy 排序41. B42. F43. D44. G45. A爭(zhēng)議題解析23. Which of the following would shaw and Newman most probably agree on?[A] It is writers39。 duty to fulfill journalistic goals.[B] It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.[C] Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.[D] Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.【其他答案】[C] Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.【點(diǎn)點(diǎn)答案】[D] Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.【解析】我們根據(jù)題干中的Shaw 和Newman定位到原文第三段,注意,題干是問(wèn):Shaw 和Newman最可能同意什么?也就是在問(wèn)shaw 和Newman的觀點(diǎn)是什么。盡管第③句提到了這兩個(gè)人,但是并沒(méi)有表明他們是什么觀點(diǎn)。我們來(lái)看第⑤句話:“So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a(chǎn) term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are.’”(“能擁有足夠的才智或文學(xué)天賦可以使他們?cè)谛侣剺I(yè)上成就自己的事業(yè)的作者是如此之少”, 紐曼寫(xiě)道,“以致于我很想把‘新聞業(yè)’定義成被某些作家所使用的一個(gè)蔑稱(chēng)。對(duì)真正的作家而言,他們根本就沒(méi)有學(xué)問(wèn)”。),大家注意,so…that…句型中的so引導(dǎo)的前半句正是Newman所強(qiáng)調(diào)的地方,即這樣的作者是如此之少,根據(jù)so引導(dǎo)的前半句話,我們可以確定[D]. Not all writers are capable of journalistic 。其中few authors整體替換Not all writers;keep one’s end up in表示“ 在… 成就某人事業(yè)”。 而某機(jī)構(gòu)選[C]. Writers are likely to be tempted into “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as…. 產(chǎn)生了誤解。25. What would be the best title for the text?[A] Newspapers of the Good Old Days[B] The Lost Horizon in Newspapers[C] Mournful Decline of Journalism[D] Prominent Critics in Memory【點(diǎn)點(diǎn)答案】[D] Prominent Critics in Memory【解析】此題爭(zhēng)議很大!題干問(wèn):本文最好的標(biāo)題是什么。我們逐項(xiàng)來(lái)看[A] Newspapers of the Good Old Days(過(guò)去美好日子的報(bào)紙),大家注意,作者懷念過(guò)去美好日子是沒(méi)錯(cuò)的,過(guò)去美好的日子主要指文藝評(píng)論的范圍與嚴(yán)肅性,作者懷念過(guò)去,錯(cuò)誤之處在于中心詞,要是改為:the Good Old Days of Newspapers(報(bào)紙的過(guò)去美好日子)就可以考慮了。再看[B] The Lost Horizon in Newspapers(報(bào)紙中失去的視野),可能會(huì)有人考慮horizon不就是scope與perspective的替換嗎?但是,我們看第一句話(也是本文的主題句)Of all the changes that have taken place in Englishlanguage newspapers during the past quartercentury, perhaps the most farreaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage. 后半句說(shuō)或許最具有深遠(yuǎn)意義的變化就是這些報(bào)紙文藝報(bào)道的范圍在縮小、嚴(yán)肅性在減弱,勢(shì)頭不可阻擋。注意:inexorable decline ,是說(shuō)“勢(shì)不可擋的衰退”,而B(niǎo)項(xiàng)中的定語(yǔ)是lost(失去、消失),大家想程度再怎么大的衰退也不會(huì)消失吧?畢竟還沒(méi)有到了lost的程度;另外文章主題說(shuō)的是文藝評(píng)論的衰退,而不是報(bào)紙的衰退。[C] Mournful Decline of Journalism(新聞業(yè)令人惋惜的衰退)分析同B項(xiàng),注意這里邊的Journalism(新聞業(yè))涵蓋的范圍太大,Journalism Newspaper arts 。最后一項(xiàng)[D] Prominent Critics in Memory(記憶中杰出的評(píng)論家),D項(xiàng)是以小見(jiàn)大,注意,以評(píng)論家的命運(yùn)說(shuō)明文藝評(píng)論的命運(yùn)。26. Businessmethod patents have recently aroused concern because of [A] their limited value to business[B] their connection with asset allocation[C] the possible restriction on their granting[D] the controversy over authorization【其他答案】[D] the controversy over authorization【點(diǎn)點(diǎn)答案】[C] the possible restriction on their granting【解析】問(wèn)商業(yè)方法專(zhuān)利最近由于什么引起了人們的關(guān)注。根據(jù)題干的recently我們定位到原文第二段。Now the nation39。s top patent court appears poised to scale back on businessmethod patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. 答案就在這句話中。我們來(lái)看,這句話的意思是:現(xiàn)在美國(guó)頂尖的專(zhuān)利法院似乎謹(jǐn)慎地縮小商業(yè)方法專(zhuān)利,而這種專(zhuān)利自從10年前被政府授權(quán)后就一直存在爭(zhēng)議。至于某機(jī)構(gòu)選擇的[D] the controversy over authorization (對(duì)授權(quán)的爭(zhēng)議),從這句話的定語(yǔ)從句部分我們可以知道,這種爭(zhēng)議已經(jīng)長(zhǎng)達(dá)10年之久,而不是現(xiàn)在才引起人們的關(guān)注,因此是不能入選的。我們選[C]the