【正文】 o?ns th?at ca?nnot ?be fo?resee?n， an?d pil?ot er?rors ?often? caus?e muc?h lar?ger d?eposi?ts of? spra?y tha?n （ ?C） unf?orese?eable? weat?her c?ondit?ions， ? and ?pilot? erro?rs ar?e the? caus?e of ?much ?large?r dep?osits? of s?pray ?than ?they ?had ? （ D） w?eathe?r con?ditio?ns th?at ar?e not? fore?seeab?le， an?d pil?ot er?rors ?often? caus?e muc?h lar?ger d?eposi?ts of? spra?y tha?n （ ?E） unf?orese?eable? weat?her c?ondit?ions， ? and ?pilot? erro?rs of?ten c?ause ?much ?large?r dep?osits? of s?pray ?than ?they ?had ?轉(zhuǎn)貼于：考 ?試大 _金融 ?英語考試 ?? read? of A?dams39。? leng?thy s?epara?tion ?from ?her f?amily?， her? diff?icult? trav?els， ?and h?er co?nstan?t bat?tles ?with ?illne?ss is? to f?ell i?ntens?ely h?ow ha?rsh l?ife w?as ev?en fo?r the? soc?alled? aris?tocra?cy of? Revo?lutio?nary ?times?. ?（ A） To? read? of ? （ B） R?eadin?g abo?ut ?（ C） Ha?ving ?read ?about? （ D?） Once? one ?reads? of ? （ E） T?o hav?e rea?d of ? 35.? A st?ar wi?l1 co?mpres?s its?elf i?nto a? whit?e dwa?rf， a? neut?ron s?tar， ?or a ?black? hole? afte?r it ?passe?s thr?ough ?a red? gian?t sta?ge， d?epend?ing o?n mas?s. ?（ A） A ?star ?will ?pr?ess i?tself? into? a wh?ite d?warf， ? a ne?utron? star?， or ?a bla?ck ho?le af?ter i?t pas?ses t?hroug?h a r?ed gi?ant s?tage， ? depe?nding? on m?ass ? （ B） A?fter ?passi?ng th?rough? a re?d gia?nt st?age， ?depen?ding ?on it?s mas?s， a ?star ?will ?pr?ess i?tself? into? a wh?ite d?warf， ? a ne?utron? star?， or ?a bla?ck ho?le. ? （ C） A?fter ?passi?ng th?rough? a re?d gia?nt st?age， ?a sta?r39。s m?ass w?ill d?eterm?ine i?f it ?pr?esses? itse?lf in?to a ?white? dwar?f， a ?neutr?on st?ar， o?r a b?lack ?hole ? （ D） ?Mass ?deter?mines? whet?her a? star?， aft?er pa?ssing? thro?ugh t?he re?d gia?nt st?age， ?will ?pr?ess i?tself? into? a wh?ite d?warf， ? a ne?utron? star?， or ?a bla?ck ho?le ?（ E） Th?e mas?s of ?a sta?r， af?ter p?assin?g thr?ough ?the r?ed gi?ant s?tage， ? will? dete?rmine? whet?her i?t ?press?es it?self ?into ?a whi?te dw?arf， ?a neu?tron ?star， ? or a? blac?k hol?e 3? ?the m?ain， ?incid?ents ?of br?eakdo?wns i?n nuc?lear ?react?ors h?ave n?ot re?sulte?d fro?m lap?ses o?f hig?h tec?hnolo?gy bu?t ?monpl?ace i?nadeq?uacie?s in ?plumb?ing a?nd wi?ring.? （ A?） not ?resul?ted f?rom l?apses? of h?igh t?echno?logy ?but ? （ B） r?esu1t?ed no?t fro?m 1ap?sesdh?igh t?echno?logy ?but f?rom ? （ C） r?esu1t?ed fr?om 1a?pses ?not o?f hig?h tec?hnolo?gy bu?t hav?e ste?mmed ?from ? （ D） ?resul?ted f?rom l?apses? not ?of hi?gh te?chnol?ogy b?ut ha?ve st?emmed? from? （ E?） resu?1ted ?not f?rom l?apses? of h?igh t?echno?logy ?but h?ave s?temme?d fro?m 3?7. Se?eming? to b?e the? on1y? a?nizat?ion f?ighti?ng fo?r the? righ?ts of? poor? peop?le in? the ?South?， Hos?ea Hu?dson， ?a 1ab?erer ?in Al?abama?， join?ed th?e Com?munis?t par?ty in? 1931?. （ ?A） See?ming ?to be? （ B?） As ? （ C） I?n tha?t the?y see?med ? （ D） S?ince ?it se?emed ? （ E） ?Becau?se it? seem?ed to? be ? 38. ?Altho?ugh m?any a?rt pa?trons? can ?readi?1v di?ffere?ntiat?e a g?ood d?ebent?ure f?rom a?n und?esira?ble o?ne， t?hey a?re mu?ch le?ss ex?pert ?in di?sting?uishi?ng go?od pa?intin?gs an?d poo?r one?s， au?thent?ic ar?t and? fake?s. ?（ A） mu?ch le?ss ex?pert ?in di?sting?uishi?ng go?od pa?intin?gs an?d poo?r one?s， au?thent?ic ar?t and? （ B?） far ?less ?exper?t in ?disti?nguis?hing ?good ?paint?ings ?from ?per o?nes， ?authe?ntic ?art f?rom ? （ C） m?uch l?ess e?xpert? when? it c?omes ?to di?sting?uishi?ng go?od pa?intin?gs an?d per? ones?， aut?henti?c art? from? （ D?） far ?less ?exper?t in ?disti?nguis?hing ?good ?paint?ings ?and p?oor o?nes， ?authe?ntic ?art a?nd ?（ E） fa?r les?s the? expe?rt wh?en it? e?s to ?disti?nguis?hing ?betwe?en go?od pa?intin?g， po?or on?es， a?uthen?tic a?rt， a?nd 39?.Rule?s ban?ning ?cance?r－ cau?sing ?subst?ances? from? food? appl?y to ?new f?ood a?dditi?ves a?nd no?t to ?natur?a1 co?nstit?uents? of f?ood b?ecaus?e the?ir us?e as ?addit?ives ?is en?tirel?y avo?idabl?e. ? （ A） t?heir ?use a?s add?itive?s is ? （ B） ?as ad?ditiv?es， t?heir ?use i?s （ ?C） the? use ?of su?ch ad?ditiv?es is? （ D?） the ?use o?f suc?h add?itive?s are? （ E?） the ?use o?f the?m as ?addit?ives ?is ?40. T?he av?erage? week?ly wa?ge ne?ar1y ?doub1?ed in? the ?l97039。? s， r?ising? from? ＄ 11?4 to ?＄ 220?， yet? the ?avera?ge wo?rker ?ended? the ?decad?e wit?h a d?ecrea?se in? what? thei?r pay? may ?buy. ? （ A） ? with? a de?creas?e in ?what ?their? pay ?may b?uy ?（ B） w?ith w?hat w?as a ?decre?ase i?n wha?t the?y wer?e abl?e to ?buy ? （ C） h?aving? decr?eased? that? whic?h the?y cou?ld bu?y （ ?D） de?creas?ing i?n pur?chasi?ng po?wer ? （ E） ?with ?a dec?rease? in p?urcha?sing ?power? 41?. Sin?ce ch?romos?ome d?amage? may ?be ca?used ?by vi?ral i?nfect?ions， ? medi?cal x?rays?， and? expo?sure ?to su?nligh?t， it ?is im?porta?nt th?at th?e chr?omoso?mes o?f a p?opula?tion ?to be? test?ed fo?r che?mical?ly in?duced? dama?ge be? p?ared ?with ?those? of a? cont?rol p?opula?tion.? （ A?） to b?e tes?ted f?or ch?emica?lly i?nduce?d dam?age b?e ?pared? with? （ B?） bein?g tes?ted f?or da?mage ?induc?ed ch?emica?lly a?re co?mpare?d wit?h （ ?C） bei?ng te?sted ?for c?hemic?ally ?induc?ed da?mage ?shoul?d be ?pa?red t?o （ ?D） bei?ng te?sted ?for c?hemic?ally ?induc?ed da?mage ?are t?o be ?pa?red t?o （ ?E） tha?t is ?to be? test?ed fo?r che?mical?ly in?duced? dama?ge ar?e to ?be co?mpara?ble w?ith ? 42. ?The s?uspec?t in ?the b?urgla?ry wa?s adv?ised ?of hi?s rig?ht to? rema?in si?lent， ? told? he c?ould ?not l?eave， ? and ?was i?nterr?ogate?d in ?a det?entio?n roo?m. ?（ A） of? his ?right? to r?emain? sile?nt， t?old h?e cou?ld no?t lea?ve， a?nd wa?s （ ?B） of ?his r?ight ?to re?main ?silen?t， to?ld he? coul?d not? leav?e， an?d （ ?C） his? righ?t to ?remai?n sil