【導(dǎo)讀】觀性原則可以減少危險性。守客觀性原則，則可以順利完成工作并避免受到誹謗。給別人所留下的刻板印象的影響，他們解釋說主要是犯了誹謗的判決的危險。們認(rèn)為大多數(shù)人都了解結(jié)束報道時機的重要性。在談到自己被控告誹謗的經(jīng)歷時，記者肯定其行為是客觀的，但也犯了無可避免的錯誤。定的“客觀性”與“事實”之間，他們自己或其他記者觀察或可核實。否Alberto的確是Longina的丈夫。此外，以驗證“事實”，以下四個戰(zhàn)略步驟，讓記者來宣揚他們的客觀性。新聞記者必須能夠識別的“事實”，甚至盡管他們中的一些。真實的性格是不容易核查。未來的批評他的“客觀性”的能力處于危險之中。的數(shù)據(jù)，因此，由自己決定”標(biāo)簽這種做法。球范圍內(nèi)的安全損害發(fā)展高估。們面臨的困境，以確定和驗證的“事實”。的更多的“完成”，例如審查工作標(biāo)題被認(rèn)為是宣傳共產(chǎn)主義的。他將提供“事實”，他們真的支持的初步肯定。宣稱自己是客觀的，“客觀”或“無偏見”。

　　

【正文】 we considered the high number of participants, the majority young. The missioner of the municipal police John Smith, in charge of the local police station, has declared: Only two or three fights, quickly controlled, have darkened something a so perfect day. (the appointments of the first three paragraphs were taken from the speeches that was pronounced in the event, although the source is not identified in the news). Although the reporter personally was in agreement with the affirmations and entreillados terms, the iles allow him to affirm that it has not interfered with his opinions in the subject. The iles turn to history objective and they protect to him before his superior ones. This journalist received most of the orders of cover of manifestations, although she got along with the demonstrators, on the contrary who its platoon leaders. If these had noticed their political affections not him they had returned to mand to manifestations. In addition their stories would have undergone considerable alterations. Without a doubt the edition heads praised among them the work of the reporter. In sum, the reporter manipulated to his superior ones, interfering with his own opinions by means of the use of a mechanism associated to the objectivity. 4. To structure the information in an appropriate phrase. To structure the information in appropriate phrases is also a procedure to denote objectivity that is put like example of formal attribute in the news. The most important information of an event has to appear in the first paragraph, and the successive paragraphs will contain the information in decreasing importance. The structure of the news theoretically is looked like an inverted pyramid. This one is the more problematic formal aspect of the objectivity for a journalist. With respect to the other three formal attributes, the journalist can affirm that she has presented/displayed the different affirmations really in conflict, that are additional evidences and that he has limited himself to pile them, and who the appointments and the entreillada information represents the opinion of the others, to not hers own one it. Anyway, although a journalist even can unconsciously act by experience choosing a heading which they will approve his platoon leaders and it to fold itself to the policy of means, the journalist continues being responsible for the holder of the news. He cannot adduce that the election has made it another person. The journalist can invoke his professionalism and only affirm that to his holder valued the his own journalistic judgment. To invoke the own journalistic judgment (the journalistic sense of smell) is an intrinsically defensive mechanism, because the journalistic valuation is the ability to choose objectively between facts that pete to each other, deciding what facts are more important or interesting. Important or interesting it denotes content. In other words, to justify the structuring of the information the journalist must adduce his slight knowledge of content, important or interesting. Until certain point the difficulties of the informer are reduced thanks to the wellknown formula according to which the news have to contain who, what, when, where, how and why. These five questions are what it is called the main material facts of an event. Thus, the journalist who briefs in the first place the main material things of an event, will be able to affirm that he has been objective. For example, when she explained how she wrote the news on the pacifist manifestation and antirecruitment, the journalist affirmed: In the first place I headed the news with main the material things of the subject... How many people the number of recruitment letters was... 233。so is the event there... that were exhibited... In the second (paragraph) I indicated the atmosphere. Soon I spoke of the speeches. What goes first they are the pure facts. Nevertheless the newspapers and journalists can who do not agree in the identification of these material facts. This same reporter, leafing through the news of the manifestation published by another newspaper, erased it of partisan. One plained which there were thousands of people (in the manifestation), and all less two or three had behaved pacifically, and nevertheless the newspaper of afternoon headed the subject with the violent incident. Obvious, the journalist of the vespertine newspaper would talk back that its news was objective, because the violence was the most material thing, who, what, how, when, where and why of history. As it demonstrates Literature amply, the newspapers dissent in their elections of the material facts, although the informative policy of each one of them proclaims that they are objective. If the journalists have difficulties to identify the material facts, even without leaving the informative policy of his own newspaper, she can that put in practice another possible option. Instead of discussing the formal attributes of an individual informed story, they can describe the formal attributes of a newspaper.