【正文】 說(shuō)明文，介紹了教師職業(yè)與演員職業(yè)的異同。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)最后一段中的“I have known many teachers who are fine actors in class but are unable to take part in a stageplay because they can39。t keep strictly to what another has written.”我認(rèn)識(shí)許多老師，他們?cè)谡n堂上是很好的演員，但在舞臺(tái)劇中卻表演不好，因?yàn)樗麄儾荒車?yán)格遵守別人提前寫好的內(nèi)容，可知，一個(gè)好老師不一定在表演臺(tái)上能表演好。故選B。 （2）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中的“Watch a good teacher, and you will see that he doesn39。t sit still before his class。 he stands the whole time he is teaching”看一個(gè)好老師，你會(huì)看到他常常不會(huì)靜靜地在教室前邊坐著，他在教授的整節(jié)課上都會(huì)站著，可知，一個(gè)好老師不應(yīng)該就在班級(jí)前坐著，所以選項(xiàng)B描述不正確。故選B。 （3）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第一段可知，要成為一名優(yōu)秀的教師，你需要具備某些好演員的天賦。你必須能hold住觀眾（學(xué)生）的注意力和興趣點(diǎn)。語(yǔ)言要清晰，聲音要宏亮、悅耳，而且收放自如。.而且為了讓你所傳授的東西更好地被理解，你應(yīng)該能把你它表演出來(lái)。，故選D。 （4）考查主旨大意。本文第一段提出了做一名好老師應(yīng)該具有的天賦，以及通過(guò)與演員職業(yè)對(duì)比，說(shuō)明做老師與做演員的差異。文章從前到后都在告訴我們?nèi)绾尾拍艹蔀橐幻美蠋?。故選A。 【點(diǎn)評(píng)】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解和主旨大意兩個(gè)題型的考查，是一篇文化類閱讀，考生需要準(zhǔn)確掌握細(xì)節(jié)信息，并根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行概括和歸納，從而選出正確答案。8．閱讀理解 Nobel prize winners sometimes display as much uniqueness when deciding how to spend their prize money as they did on the work that won them the award in the first place. When Sir Paul Nurse won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2001, he decided to upgrade his motorbike. A fellow winner in 1993, Richard Roberts, installed a croquet lawn in front of his house. Austrian author Elfriede Jelinek, who won in 2004, said the prize meant financial independence. Lars Heikensten, executive director of the Nobel Foundation, said there were no obvious shopping trends among winners. I think it depends a lot on which country they e from, their personal finances... what kind of ines they have when they get the prize, he said. Real estate, however, is a popular option, at least among those willing to reveal what they spend the money on. Phillip Sharp, the American cowinner of the 1993 medicine prize, decided to splash out on a 100yearold Federal style house. I took that money and bought a little bit bigger house... It39。s a beautiful old place, he told AFP(法新社), adding that The money is a nice part of the process, but the important thing about the prize is the recognition. For winners of the peace prize the decision is often more clearcut, as the honor tends to go to politicians, organizations and activists who are under more public supervision. Many, like US President Barack Obama in 2009 and the European Union in 2012, donate to charities. Literature winners tend to be more private about how they use the money, but the choice is often equally straightforward. Even if Nobelwinning authors are quite well known, many of them will not have made much money from writing, said Anna Gunder, a Nobel literature expert at Uppsala University. While the prize might keep the wolf from the door for some years, giving them freedom to write, it can also briefly have the opposite effect. It really changes their careers… During the first year after they39。ve won they often write less, but they generally continue after a year or two, said Gunder.（1）From the passage, we learn that ______. A.The money is actually the best part of the Nobel PrizeB.Nobel winners have great originality in using prize moneyC.Few winners would spend their prize money on housesD.Winners bee more independent on their country（2）Which of the following is closest in meaning to the underlined phrase clearcut in paragraph 6? A.openB.privateC.uniqueD.plex（3）According to the passage, in the first year after winning Noble Prize, literature winners may . A.bee less productiveB.make more money from writingC.have the freedom to create more and better worksD.disappear from the public eyes for a period of time【答案】 （1）B（2）A（3）A 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇說(shuō)明文，介紹了諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)獲得者在決定如何花他們的獎(jiǎng)金時(shí)展現(xiàn)出很多的獨(dú)特性。比如，房產(chǎn)就是眾多諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)獲得者喜歡投資的方向。作者還提到了諾貝爾和平獎(jiǎng)獲得者對(duì)獎(jiǎng)金的花費(fèi)更公開(kāi)，而文學(xué)家獲得者對(duì)獎(jiǎng)金的花費(fèi)更私人化。 （1）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第一段可知，諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)獲得者在決定如何花他們的獎(jiǎng)金時(shí)展現(xiàn)出很多的獨(dú)特性。originality獨(dú)創(chuàng)性，創(chuàng)造性， 故選B。 （2）考查詞義猜測(cè)。根據(jù)第六段中的“For winners of the peace prize the decision is often more clearcut, as the honor tends to go to politicians, organizations and activists who are under more public supervision.”諾貝爾和平獎(jiǎng)得主的獎(jiǎng)金如何用的決定通常會(huì)更清晰，公開(kāi)。因?yàn)楹推姜?jiǎng)通常會(huì)由政治家、組織及活動(dòng)家獲得，而他們通常處在更多的公眾監(jiān)管之下。故選A。 （3）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)最后一段中的During the first year after they39。ve won they often write less,...可知在獲得諾貝爾獎(jiǎng)之后的第一年，作家作品會(huì)少一些。故選A。 【點(diǎn)評(píng)】本題考點(diǎn)涉及詞義猜測(cè)和推理判斷兩個(gè)題型的考查，是一篇文化類閱讀，要求考生根據(jù)上下文的邏輯關(guān)系，進(jìn)行分析，推理，從而選出正確答案。9．Choose the one that fits best according to the information given in the passage you have just read. Why do so many Americans distrust what they read in their newspapers? The American Society of Newspaper Editors is trying to answer this painful question. The organization is deep into a long selfanalysis known as the journalism credibility project. Sad to say, this project has turned out to be mostly lowlevel findings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, bined with lots of headscratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers really want. But the sources of distrust go way deeper. Most journalists learn to see the world through a set of standard patterns into which they report each day39。s events. In other words, there is a traditional story line in the newsroom culture that provides a backbone and a readymade narrative structure for otherwise confusing news. There exists a social and cultural disconnect between journalists and their readers, which helps explain why the standard patterns of the newsroom seem foreign to many readers. In a recent survey, questionnaires were sent to reporters in five middlesize cities around the country, plus one large metropolitan area. Then residents in these munities were phoned at random and asked the same questions. Replies show that pared with other Americans, journalists are more likely to live in upscale neighborhoods, have maids, own Mercedeses, and trade stocks, and they39。re less likely to go to church, do volunteer work, or put down roots in a munity. Reporters tend to be part of a broadly defined social and cultural elite (精英), so their work tends to reflect the traditional values of this elite. The alarming distrust of the news media isn39。t roote