【正文】
of news stories in1996reveals that the antiscience tag has been attached to many other groups as well,from authorities who advocated the elimination of the last remaining stocks of smallpox virus to Republicans who advocated decreased funding for basic research. Few would dispute that the term applies to the Unabomber,whose manifesto,published in1995,scorns science and longs for return to a pretechnological utopia. But surely that does not mean environmentalists concerned about uncontrolled industrial growth are antiscience,as an essay in US News World Report last May seemed to suggest. The environmentalists,inevitably,respond to such critics. The true enemies of science,argues Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University,a pioneer of environmental studies,are those who question the evidence supporting global warming,the depletion of the ozone layer and other consequences of industrial growth. Indeed,some observers fear that the antiscience epithet is in danger of being meaningless. “The term antiscience can lump together too many,quite different things,”notes Harvard University philosopher Gerald Holton in his1993work Science and AntiScience. “They have in mon only one thing that they tend to annoy or threaten those who regard themselves as more enlightened.” authors attitude toward the issue of “science vs. antiscience” is . A. impartial B. subjective C. biased D. puzzling 這道題涉及對“科學(xué)pk其它文化”這個沖突的態(tài)度。從第一段的開頭就能看出,只是以局外人的姿勢,指出兩者之間的沖突嚴(yán)峻,應(yīng)當(dāng)是中立態(tài)度。再者,依據(jù)上面對文章主題兩層語義的分析,既指出科學(xué)家的反擊,也指出他們的過火,換言之,的爭論是很辨證的,是客觀中立的。綜合起來,答案選A“中立的”。 能接受嗎?同學(xué)們要學(xué)會正確地分析文章的主旨和的傾向,從而把題目作對。 第 7 頁 共 7 頁