【正文】 ost germs and no one eats raw food（2）What can be concluded from Paragraph 4? packages carry germs. and surfaces are easy to get E. coli. from a turkey can be spread whether it is washed or not. methods should be applied to food to get rid of germs.（3）Which way may help to cook a turkey safely? off the turkey before it is heated. the turkey away from the lettuce and refrigerator. hands and packages before taking out the turkey. a thermometer to check the temperature of the turkey.（4）From which section of a magazine is the text probably taken? ....【答案】 （1）B（2）C（3）D（4）B 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇說明文，食品專家說清洗可能會在廚房水槽或附近的食物中傳播火雞身上的細(xì)菌，但美國農(nóng)業(yè)部的研究強(qiáng)調(diào)無論是否被清洗，火雞身上的細(xì)菌都會傳播，同時(shí)指出用溫度計(jì)檢查火雞的溫度有助于安全地烹飪火雞。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中的“The do — not — wash raw poultry advice from the USDA is relatively new and perhaps hasn39。t caught on because it goes against the mon belief that washing makes things clean, said Chapman.”查普曼說，美國農(nóng)業(yè)部提出的“不清洗生禽”的建議相對較新，但可能還沒有流行起來，因?yàn)檫@違背了人們普遍認(rèn)為的“清洗可以使東西干凈”的觀念，可知，人們不接受美國農(nóng)業(yè)部的建議是因?yàn)榍逑此坪醺档眯刨?，故選B。 （2）考查推理判斷。根據(jù)第四段中的“Among those who washed their raw chicken, about a quarter ended up spreading the bacteria to their lettuce. But even some of those who did not rinse the chicken got germs on the lettuce. And there are other opportunities for germs to survive on turkeys: melting and cooking.”在那些清洗生雞肉的人中，約四分之一的人最終將細(xì)菌傳播到生菜上，但即使是一些沒有清洗雞肉的人，生菜上也有細(xì)菌，火雞身上的細(xì)菌還有其他生存的機(jī)會：融化和烹飪，可知，不管火雞是否被清洗，它身上的細(xì)菌都會傳播，故選C。 （3）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)最后一段中的“To ensure a bird is thoroughly cooked, they say to use a thermometer to check that the deepest and thickest parts of it have reached 165 degrees.”為了確保一只家禽被徹底煮熟，他們說要用溫度計(jì)檢查它最深和最厚的部分是否達(dá)到165度，可知，用溫度計(jì)檢查火雞的溫度有助于安全地烹飪火雞，故選D。 （4）考查推理判斷。通讀全文可知，本文主要介紹了食品專家說清洗可能會在廚房水槽或附近的食物中傳播火雞身上的細(xì)菌，但美國農(nóng)業(yè)部的研究強(qiáng)調(diào)無論是否被清洗，火雞身上的細(xì)菌都會傳播，同時(shí)指出用溫度計(jì)檢查火雞的溫度有助于安全地烹飪火雞，這屬于科學(xué)范疇，因此這篇文章最有可能出自于雜志的科學(xué)版塊，故選B。 【點(diǎn)評】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解和推理判斷兩個(gè)題型的考查，是一篇健康類閱讀，考生需要準(zhǔn)確掌握細(xì)節(jié)信息，并根據(jù)上下文進(jìn)行邏輯推理，從而選出正確答案。8．閱讀理解 Jolin Tsai, a famous singer, has bee an English teacher! But she is not staying in a classroom to give you talks in English. Instead, she has published a new book, Jolin39。s English Diary Book. It came out in Taiwan in March. Jolin is helping you learn English in a lighthearted way and giving you useful words for life outside your textbooks. I hope it39。s a happy English book, she said. When you learn English in a fun way, you will keep on doing it. This certainly doesn39。t mean just reciting words. Jolin has a lot of clever ways of learning. She likes to listen to English songs or find friends to talk to in English. She has been good at English since Grade 3 in primary school. Because of this, she hosted news programme on the radio herself. Jolin knows it39。s important to put English to good use. So, in her English diaries, she wrote something about her everyday life, like study, fashion, travel and family. After each diary, she gives you lots of notes. You can use them often, too! Jolin also asks you to keep diaries like hers.（1）Jolin has been good at English . she became a famous singer she was in Grade 3 she was in college she was 3 years old（2）In Jolin39。s diaries, which of the following is not mentioned? . learning.. life.（3）From the passage we know that ______. is not only a famous singer but also an English teacher in a primary school don39。t have to keep English diaries teaches us how to be a famous singer in Jolin39。s English Diary Book Tsai shows us how to learn English in a fun way【答案】 （1）B（2）B（3）D 【解析】【分析】本文是一篇說明文，介紹了歌手蔡依林出版了一本新書《蔡依林的英語日記本》。它于三月在臺灣出版。可以幫助人們輕松地學(xué)習(xí)英語，并為課本之外的生活提供有用的詞匯。文章還說明了蔡依林寫這本書的意圖和日記的一些內(nèi)容。 （1）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中的“She has been good at English since Grade 3 in primary school.” 她從小學(xué)三年級起就擅長英語，可知，蔡依林從三年級起就擅長英語。故選B。 （2）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)最后一段中的“So, in her English diaries, she wrote something about her everyday life, like study, fashion, travel and family.” 所以，在她的英語日記中，她寫了一些關(guān)于她的日常生活，比如學(xué)習(xí)、時(shí)尚、旅行和家庭)可知，日記中提到了時(shí)尚、旅行和家庭，但沒提到運(yùn)動(dòng)。故選B。 （3）考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)第二段中“‘I hope it39。s a happy English book,’ she said. ‘When you learn English in a fun way, you will keep on doing it.’”“我希望這是一本快樂的英語書，”她說?！爱?dāng)你用一種有趣的方式學(xué)習(xí)英語時(shí)，你會堅(jiān)持下去?！笨芍?，蔡依林通過這本書向我們展示了一種輕松學(xué)習(xí)英語的方法。故選D。 【點(diǎn)評】本題考點(diǎn)涉及細(xì)節(jié)理解題型的考查，是一篇文化類閱讀，考生需要準(zhǔn)確掌握細(xì)節(jié)信息，并結(jié)合題目要求，從而選出正確答案。9．閱讀理解 For a generation now, school reform has meant what students must be taught and carried out by standardized(標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的)tests. Here39。s a thought experiment. Suppose that next year almost every student passed the tests. What would the reaction be from people? Would they shake their heads in respect and say, Damn, those teachers must be good!? Of course not. Such remarkable success would be used as evidence that the tests were too easy and it needs to raise standards. High standards really means standards that all students will never be able to meet. My little thought experiment uncovers a truth that we have been taught to respond with doubt whenever all members of any group are successful. In America, success doesn39。t count unless it is got by only a few. Consider widespread plaints about grade inflation(膨脹) in higher education. Many people don39。t even bother to stress that grades have risen over time. They simply point to how many students get A39。s right now. The goal, in other words, isn39。t to do well but to defeat other people who are also trying to do well. Grades in testing should be used to announce who39。s beating whom. A school39。s final task, apparently, is not to help everyone learn but to prepare the game so that there will always be losers. This makes no sense in any situation. Perhaps, for example, we can defend rating states or nations based on the quality of their air, health care or schools, but ranking them is foolish. School testing ranking doesn39。t lead to improvements in performance but tends to hold us back from doing our best. It makes productive teamwork less likely and leads all concerned to focus not on meaningful improvements but on trying to beat