【文章內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介】
pound assay Sen Spe CPK 96 57 SGOT 91 74 LDH 87 91 91 Multivariate analysis ?SEN ?SPE single variable analysis marker methods SEN (%) spe (%) cutoff AREA a ELISA b ELISA c ELISA d ELISA e ELISA f ELISA multivariate analysis using logistic regression Combined markers SEN (%) SPE(%) AREA a and b a and c a and e a and f a and d .0936 b and c b and d b and e b and f C and d C and e C and f d and e d and f e and f Prediction the probability of a disease ? Logit(P)= + x a + x e Avoiding overfitting ? Overfitting occurs when a puter model identifies a “chance” pattern that discriminates cancer patients from noncancer patients, perfectly fitting that dataset but not reproducible in other data sets. ? One way to avoiding overfitting is to randomly split the data into separate training and test samples. The EBM steps for diagnostic tests ? Looking for the most suitable study papers according to the clinical question ? Bring forward the question in clinic ?Example 2 : if detection of serum forritin can diagnose Iron deficiency anemia? ? Search the puter information using the apposite key word ?“diagnose Iron deficiency anemia” and “diagnostic test” and “human” Evaluation of the scientificity of the papers ? If pared with the gold standard independently and blindly ? Example 2: Iron stain with myeloid biopsy ? If detected with the control test for every quizzee Gold standard Total ( No.) Results + New diagnostic test + 35 15 50 sensitivity=46% New diagnostic test 40 460 500 specificity=% Verification bias Gold standard Total ( No.) Results + New diagnostic test + 35 15 50 sensitivity=90% New diagnostic test 4 46 50 specificity=75% If the patient samples included a broad spectrum of the disease ? If the disease spectrum uniform ?What’s the objective question that the investigator concerned about ?If the study sample and the quizzee is uniform ?Spectrum bias: overstate the performance parameter of the diagnostic test because of excluding the “grey zone”