20xxted英語演講有多少app正在窺視你的隱私(編輯修改稿)
2025-01-16 23:10 本頁面
【文章內(nèi)容簡介】 eit position.
你可能會覺得，”。這沒發(fā)生在我身上。我只需要遠(yuǎn)離這些有缺陷的設(shè)備就好?！?。但這無法保證你的安全，因為只是通過連接上互聯(lián)網(wǎng)，你就不可避免地被置于要么接受，要么走人的境地。
Let me show you. Like most of you, I have dozens of apps on my phone, and used properly, they can make our lives easier, more convenient and maybe even healthier. But have we been lulled into a false sense of security? It starts simply by ticking a box. Yes, we say, Iamp。39。ve read the terms. But have you really read the terms?
給大家看看。像很多人一樣，我手機上有幾十個應(yīng)用，使用得當(dāng)，它們可以讓我們生活更輕松，更便捷，甚至可能更健康。但我們是否被一種虛假的安全感蒙蔽了呢?它開始于簡單勾選一個方框開始。是的，我們會說，我已經(jīng)閱讀過這些條款。但你真的閱讀了這些條款嗎?
Are you sure they didnamp。39。t look too long and your phone was running out of battery, and the last time you tried they were impossible to understand, and you needed to use the service now? And now, the power imbalance is established, because we have agreed to our personal information being gathered and used on a scale we could never imagine.
你確定它們不是看起來太長，你的手機快沒電了，你最后一次嘗試時，它們非?；逎y懂，而且你需要立刻使用這個服務(wù)?目前，權(quán)力的不平衡已經(jīng)建立，因為我們同意讓對方收集我們的個人信息，并用于我們無法想象的規(guī)模層面。
This is why my colleagues and I decided to take a deeper look at this. We set out to read the terms of popular apps on an average phone. And to show the world how unrealistic it is to expect consumers to actually read the terms, we printed them, more than 900 pages, and sat down in our office and read them out loud ourselves, streaming the experiment live on our websites.
這就是我和同事們決定去深入研究這個問題的原因。我們開始閱讀一臺普通手機上熱門應(yīng)用的條款。并且向世界展示，讓消費者去閱讀這些條款是多么的不切實際，我們把這些條款打印出來，總長度超過了900頁紙，然后坐在辦公室里大聲朗讀，并在我們的網(wǎng)站上直播這個實驗。
As you can see, it took quite a long time. It took us 31hours, 49 minutes and 11 seconds to read the terms on an average phone. That is longer than a movie marathon of the amp。quot。Harry Potteramp。quot。 movies and the amp。quot。Godfatheramp。quot。 movies bined.
很顯然，需要花很長的時間。我們花了31個小時，49分鐘11秒才閱讀完一臺普通手機上的條款。這比《哈利波特》和《教父》系列電影加起來還長。
And reading is one thing. Understanding is another story. That would have taken us much, much longer. And this is a real problem, because panies have argued for 20 to 30 years against regulating the internet better, because users have consented to the terms and conditions.
閱讀是一回事，理解則是另外一碼事。這會需要我們更多更多的時間。這是一個切實存在的問題，因為這些公司爭執(zhí)了2030年，反對更好地監(jiān)管互聯(lián)網(wǎng)，因為用戶已經(jīng)同意了這些條款和條件。
As weamp。39。ve shown with this experiment, achieving informed consent is close to impossible. Do you think itamp。39。s fair to put the burden of responsibility on the consumer? I donamp。39。t. I think we should demand less takeitorleaveit and more understandable terms before we agree to them.
正如我們在這個實驗中展示的，獲得知情同意幾乎是不可能的。你認(rèn)為讓消費者承擔(dān)責(zé)任是公平的嗎?我不認(rèn)同。我認(rèn)為我們應(yīng)該要求減少要么接受要么放棄，在我們同意前給出更多可理解的條款。
T
范文總結(jié)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1