【正文】 rces development, integration of coal resources and should be taken to the enterprise merger and reorganization Economic policy, expand the size of the coal enterprises to strengthen technological innovation, improve the management efficiency of largescale coal enterprise, largescale coal enterprise39。本文考慮一省范圍內(nèi)的 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)，由于省內(nèi)各地區(qū)之間的差異相對較小，從而使用面板數(shù)據(jù)模型可以更好地解釋煤炭資源開發(fā)與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展之間的關(guān)系，而不必關(guān)注區(qū)位特性不同所帶來的模型估計問題。關(guān)于 “ 資源詛咒 ” 的機理， Gylfason的研究表明，由于資源部門具有更高的邊際生產(chǎn)率，物質(zhì)資本和人力資本將會轉(zhuǎn) 移至初級產(chǎn)業(yè)部門，但初級產(chǎn)業(yè)部門對人力資本的要求較低，從而造成物質(zhì)資本對人力資本的擠出效應(yīng)，人才的外流最終導(dǎo)致經(jīng)濟的衰退。資源豐度既可指單項資源的豐度，也可指某類資源組合的豐度。劉紅梅等基于我國省際面板數(shù)據(jù)，在考慮經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)象的時間和空間自相關(guān)性的 基礎(chǔ)上，應(yīng)用動態(tài)面板數(shù)據(jù)模型和空間遞歸面板數(shù)據(jù)模型對農(nóng)業(yè)虛擬水 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)進行了檢驗，結(jié)果表明確實存在 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)。本文的實證研究表明，大型煤炭企業(yè)對地區(qū)經(jīng)濟增長具有促進作用，中小型煤炭企業(yè)對地區(qū)經(jīng)濟增長無顯著影響。 2020 年 4 月，山西省開展了一場煤炭產(chǎn)業(yè)重組風(fēng)暴，年產(chǎn)量 30 萬 t 以下的煤礦全部淘汰關(guān)閉，調(diào)整的目標是實現(xiàn)煤炭產(chǎn)業(yè)的升級，發(fā)展煤炭循環(huán)經(jīng)濟，拉長產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈。 上述研究均是從省際層面探討了 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)，而景普秋、王清憲從省域、地級市、縣域三個層面分析了山西省資源詛咒效應(yīng)，指出豐富的煤炭資源既是經(jīng)濟增長的動力，也加劇了經(jīng)濟增長的波動。山西是煤炭大省，全省儲煤面積占近 40%， 1979年到 2020年間山西省累計生產(chǎn)原煤 90億 t，占全國原煤總產(chǎn)量的 %，因此可以忽略其他資源的影響。 Sachs和 Warner對資源詛咒假說進行了開創(chuàng)性的實證檢驗 ,他們以 95個發(fā)展中國家 1970年 1989年的數(shù)據(jù)為樣本進行回歸分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)自然資源稟賦與經(jīng)濟增長之間存在著顯著的負相關(guān)性，資源豐富的國家與地區(qū)經(jīng)濟增長反而慢于資源稀缺的國家與地區(qū)。首先，山西是煤炭大省，煤炭產(chǎn)業(yè)是支柱產(chǎn)業(yè)，因此可以忽略其他資源的 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)，以山西為典型案例，分析 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)，可以很好地解決多種資源 “ 資源詛咒 ” 效應(yīng)中的權(quán)重問題。s economists generally believe that natural resources is the premise and the source of capital accumulation, rich in natural resources has a positive effect on regional economic growth. But there are some scholars put forward the theory of resource curse, think that rich in natural resources hinder the regional economic development. Sachs and Warner, first has carried on the empirical test to resource curse effect, after many scholars in different regions, different model set has carried on the inspection to resource curse effect, but so far there is no unified conclusion. Resource abundance is that single resource abundance, can also refer to a certain bination of resource abundance. Some scholars to some kind of resource bination of resource abundance abundance to examine region, but because there are many different kinds of resources, assuming that the resource curse effect does exist, the weight of all kinds of resources should also be different, and the existing research did not consider this, resulting in resource development and economic development relationship between empirical research conclusion deviation. Shanxi Province is the largest coal, coal storage area of the whole province accounted for nearly 40%, from 1979 to 2020 in Shanxi Province production rawcoal 9 billion t, accounting for % of the total coal production, so you can ignore the influence of other resources. Taking Shanxi Province as an example, the analysis of coal resources development and economic development, the relationship between the sustainable development of resourcebased area Reference for decision making. Auty first puts forward the concept of resource curse, namely the abundance of resources for economic growth is not sufficient favorable conditions, but is a kind of restriction. Sachs and Warner groundbreaking for the resource curse hy