pdaaaa畢業(yè)論文心得分享我的投稿經(jīng)歷-酸甜苦辣(完整版)
【正文】 these ments we cannot accept the paperfor publication in the Physical Review.Yours sincerely,Assistant EditorPhysical Review BEmail: prbFax: 6315914141Physics spotlighting exceptional research: PRL Celebrates 50 Years: PRB Editors39。這個在PLA稿中沒有，我們的計(jì)算所用到的勢場是我們自己計(jì)算得到的，而不是用簡單的解析表達(dá)式的形式。2. 改動文章的結(jié)構(gòu)。As we know, in the ...39。Generally, the quantized ...39。下面是編輯的信以及審稿意見，我想把它貼出來與蟲友們分享，一方面我認(rèn)為，通過看審稿人的意見，可以幫助大家更好地寫作，提高自己的科研水平和能力，另一方面也是答謝小木蟲上很多無私的蟲友們，是他們將自己的投稿經(jīng)歷貼在網(wǎng)上，與大家分享，我想我沒有理由不拿出來哈！同時，也希望小木蟲的蟲子們能繼續(xù)發(fā)揚(yáng)這種精神，大家同舟共濟(jì)，共同提高！好了，廢話說了一大堆，不說了，下面是Physics Letters A 的審稿意見：Ms. Ref. No.: Title: Physics Letters ADear professor ,Reviewers39。 ments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.For your guidance, I append the reviewers39。39。39。換了很多圖。這個修改可是個相當(dāng)漫長的過程。 Suggestions: Report of the First Referee /The paper aims at the numerical solution of the set of Schroedingerand Poisson equations for a splitgate structure and subsequentapplication of the results to calculation of quantizedacoustoelectric current.The paper is sound and well written. However, in my view, it does notcontain enough new physics to warrant its publication in the PhysicalReview. Since the work seems to be useful to people involved inoptimizing standards of electrical current I remend to resubmit thepaper to a journal more specialized on applications, such as theJournal of Applied Physics.Report of the Second Referee /The subject of the paper is an interesting one, although the focus ofthe munity has shifted away from it in the meantime. Neverthelessthe paper would be worth publishing if it gave better evidence in theinteresting electron transport mechanism prevailing in this effect.Specifically the authors present numerical results for the potentialin a SAW driven splitgate induced small channel. They claimin the abstract that the potential barrier heights calculatedin the closedchannelregime agree well with the experiment weperformed. To my understanding they (implicitly) claim that theirnumerical method provides better understanding of the SETSAW effectand that it should allow for a bet
數(shù)學(xué)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號-1