【正文】 , features, reliability, timing, costs, value to the customer, innovation degree, plexity, and many more. In this case innovation quality prises all measures regarding new—innovative—products or services and thereby makes a statement on how good a pany is at pursuing innovation in the product or service domain. Similar are things with respect to the process domain of innovation quality. Also here the pany is assessed on how good it pursues process innovation considering all measures which determine the quality of new processes and how this quality has been achieved. Determining innovation quality on the enterprise level does not change in parison to the two other domains in principle since it also looks on potential, process and result, but to some degree it might be more challenging due to the increased plexity, the to identify catalysts (see Bullinger and Haner, 2020) and the need to integrate measurements on socalled soft issues. This is something already inherent to the concept of enterprise quality, which according to Grabowski (1997, p. 30) is the ability to satisfy stakeholder needs. Assessing innovation quality within the three domains of product, process and enterprise allows for distinguishing activities within organizations with respect to their goal. While for example panies might focus their research on new products, others might aim at the of the value chain or focus on introducing modern ways of working in order to attract and retain key personnel, the latter being a social innovation to be considered on the enterprise level. The concept of innovation quality therefore allows making a statement regarding the aggregated innovation performance in every domain within an organization by paring the result, being it a product, process or service innovation, with the potential and considering the process on how the result has been achieved. Therefore innovation quality has a special dynamic characteristic. . Determining innovation quality and its representation To determine the innovation quality of a whole organization, one must assess .rst 內(nèi)蒙古工業(yè)大學(xué)本科畢業(yè)論文 5 the degree of innovation quality in the individual domains. These can be achieved by applying a set of measures and integrating them possibly through a functional relationship. Potential measures for the individual domains are (see also Ahmed and Zairi, 2020): (a) product/servicerelated measures: * valueadded to the customer, * costs against targets, * stability of design, * product return on investment, * product performance level, (b) Processrelated measures: * time to market, * and productivity improvement, * level effectiveness in product development, * project management effectiveness, * .exibility increase, (c) Enterpriserelated measures: * acceptance rate throughout the workforce, * understanding customer needs, * turnover generated with innovative products, * patent ratio, * rate of successful innovation attempts, As can be seen from the few potential measures contributing to innovation quality mentioned here, the spectrum of these measures is very large. But they do have in mon, that they all can be linked to an organization’s innovation management system and therefore are in themselves indicators for innovation quality. Integrating these indicators is a matter of plexity allowance and valueadded generation. How many measures should be applied and integrated into a statement? Does a quantitative integration generate higher value than a qualitative integration? These are two questions to be dealt with when applying the concept of innovation quality. The representation of innovation quality can be performed by using radar diagrams, like 內(nèi)蒙古工業(yè)大學(xué)本科畢業(yè)論文 6 those depicted in Fig. 5. There the axes x1。這三個(gè)領(lǐng)域的創(chuàng)新素質(zhì)是產(chǎn)品 /服務(wù)、過程和企業(yè)。“質(zhì)量的控制 功能” 在社會(huì)中一 直是以數(shù)字存在的 ,在某種意義上 來說 ,是 指一個(gè)產(chǎn)品是 不是 符合 目標(biāo) 。它包括例 如員工、社會(huì)大眾和他們的需求作為基礎(chǔ) 的質(zhì)量。這 個(gè)定義的不同之處 ,第一 是沒有說健康是首要的數(shù)量 創(chuàng)新 或程度的創(chuàng)新 ,第二是沒有關(guān)于大自然 及其領(lǐng)域 的創(chuàng)新 ， 第三 ,很明顯的是 , 無論什么類型的創(chuàng)新 ，都必須 強(qiáng)調(diào)其工藝特點(diǎn) ， 為了實(shí)現(xiàn)一個(gè)創(chuàng)新 ，它的 一系列步驟必須承擔(dān)。 這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)是引用類似的事情 還有公司是通過追求過程域的創(chuàng)新素質(zhì)。具體措施