【正文】 day causing indecision or poor choices...”意思是：我們自己的決策能力會(huì)在一天中被消耗殆盡，導(dǎo)致優(yōu)柔寡斷或決策失誤。【定位信息】題干中example以及physicians可作為向?qū)г~，結(jié)合順序法，定位到第三自然段。D. 當(dāng)他們有求助的顧問(wèn)時(shí)。54. What are people likely to do when decision fatigue sets in?A) They turn to physicians for advice. B) They tend to make risky decisions. C) They adopt a totally new perspective.D) They refrain from trying anything new.【題干譯文】當(dāng)決策疲勞時(shí)，人們可能會(huì)做什么？【選項(xiàng)譯文】A. 他們會(huì)求助于醫(yī)生。既然是維持現(xiàn)狀，自然就不會(huì)嘗試新的方法。根據(jù)第六自然段第一句話：“In order to achieve a successful oute or reward, some level of risk is almost always essential.”意思是：為了獲得成功或獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)，一定程度的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)總是必不可少的。【定位信息】題干中risk可作為向?qū)г~，結(jié)合順序法，定位到第六自然段?！敬鸢冈斀狻看鸢甘荂。那么人們?cè)谑裁磿r(shí)候不太容易感到?jīng)Q策疲勞呢？答案自然是當(dāng)他們幫助別人做決定時(shí)。B. 當(dāng)他們幫助別人做決定時(shí)。C. 決策疲勞可能會(huì)阻礙人們做出明智的決定。只有利用順序法定位，該題作為本閱讀文章的第一題，閱讀點(diǎn)一般在文章開(kāi)頭或靠前的位置?！彼€補(bǔ)充說(shuō)，人們總是反復(fù)于決策者和被決策者這兩個(gè)角色之中?！?從他人那里獲得信息不僅提供了一個(gè)全新的視角和思維過(guò)程，而且往往還包括更冒險(xiǎn)的選擇。我們自己的決策能力會(huì)在一天中被消耗殆盡，導(dǎo)致優(yōu)柔寡斷或決策失誤，而代表他人做出選擇則不會(huì)落入同樣的陷阱，從而是一項(xiàng)令人愉快的任務(wù)。根據(jù)第七自然段最后三句話，我們可以得知：本世紀(jì)初到本世紀(jì)中期，美國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)福祉比其它大國(guó)都要好?！靖蓴_分析】本題為細(xì)節(jié)題，其在文中對(duì)應(yīng)的閱讀點(diǎn)明確，其他干擾項(xiàng)迷惑性較小。49. What is an advantage of the JonesKlenow method?A) It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.B) It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic wellbeing.C) It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.D) It can pare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.【題干譯文】瓊斯和克勒諾提出的方法有什么優(yōu)勢(shì)？【選項(xiàng)譯文】A. 它能夠準(zhǔn)確地指出一個(gè)國(guó)家當(dāng)前的經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題。D. 它沒(méi)有將自然資源方面的差異計(jì)算在內(nèi)?！敬鸢冈斀狻看鸢甘荄。第二自然段第二句話“Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and inplete, statistic.”意思是：不幸的是，這一結(jié)論過(guò)于強(qiáng)調(diào)統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)，而該數(shù)據(jù)雖有效，但有缺陷和不完整。它包含了影響生活質(zhì)量的更多因素，比美國(guó)人口普查局所采用的方法更全面更靈活。瓊斯和克勒諾提出的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)也可以用來(lái)評(píng)估某個(gè)國(guó)家在某個(gè)時(shí)間段的經(jīng)濟(jì)業(yè)績(jī)。瓊斯和克勒諾提出的方法可以通過(guò)一個(gè)跨國(guó)案例加以說(shuō)明。統(tǒng)計(jì)調(diào)查在衡量測(cè)算方面有如下重要問(wèn)題：1)它不包括稅收、轉(zhuǎn)賬和補(bǔ)償，如雇主提供的健康保險(xiǎn)；2)它基于調(diào)查而不是數(shù)據(jù)。 and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, ine data exclude important determinants of economic wellbeing, such as the hours of work needed to earn that ine.While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more prehensive than average ine, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.The JonesKlenow method can be illustrated by a crosscountry example. Suppose we want to pare the economic welfare of citizens of the . and France in 2005.In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the ., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that parison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours。瓊斯和彼得然而，這種比較忽略了其他相關(guān)因素：閑暇時(shí)間、預(yù)期壽命和經(jīng)濟(jì)不平等。然而，改善的速度明顯放緩。C. 它證明了福利的改善。47. What does the author say about the JonesKlenow method?A) It is widely used to pare the economic growth across countries.B) It revolutionizes the way