【正文】 大的困難。在確定痛苦不堪的認定標準時，我們應(yīng)考慮所謂的痛苦是肉體上的痛苦，還是精神上的痛苦或者兩者都有。安樂死立法所面臨的問題遠不止這些，我個人還是希望政府及相關(guān)人士能夠找出解決的辦法，讓安樂死能夠在我國盡早的實現(xiàn)，畢竟這是正義的，符合世界潮流的發(fā)展趨勢。s court upheld this case in the second finalnot guilty plea(2).This case caused quite a sensation at that time, and proposed the issues of Chinese then on, discussions about the issue have never there are many advantages of implementing euthanasia, in terms of social, family, and the patients this essay all the benefits will be elaborated respectively as regard to the social benefits, if the euthanasia is applied legally, not only the large amount of medicinal expense, but the medicinal resources can be saved , the implementation of euthanasia can reduce the social burden of medical to statistics, there are 5 ~ 7 million vegetative patients in current China, consequently, in order to maintain these patients of medical expenses of the first year cost in hospital the cost is 10 to 30 million Yuan, and after hospitalization it costs about 6 ~ 9 million each year(5).Meanwhile every year the total money that needs to spend on the home treatment and nursing costs at least to maintain such is two much expensive and the big deal of money can be used in other more useful , euthanasia helps save more medicine resources and thus realizes a more reasonable distribution of a developing country, all sorts of medical resources in the domestic market are still relatively in , patients without survival hope occupy medical equipment and medical personnel in long term, and they use a lot of medical drugs to continue a meaningless apparently is a serious waste to limited health these resources can be used for those more urgent and hopeful patients, they will receive an effective , euthanasia does much good to the transplant of human present each country is faced with the human organ source shortage there are no enough organ sources, many patients those seriously ill patients without curable hope can denote their organs after euthanasia, more alive patients will , some people are against the implantation of euthanasia in the view that those hopeless patients have their own right to live and the society should not sacrifice their mon as far as laws are concerned, euthanasia is implemented according to the patient, their family and the doctor’s willing, therefore, it is an end of the patients’ suffering rather than the opponents of euthanasia are against the social benefits as mentioned above, people can not ignore the requests of the patients those who are seriously ill and incurable, a painless death is a satisfactory ending to euthanasia, they will die peacefully without the physical and spiritual in Dutch, a doctor helped her mother to apply euthanasia according to her mother’s request, thus her mother can rest after horrible this way both the patient and people around receive a those who are against this issue and take this behavior as illegal, they should stand in the patients’ shoes and realize that they would rather die dignifiedly than , it is not doubt that an incurable patient causes heavy burden to the of such patients have a moral obligation to take care of , in the long run, both the nurse and seeing of patients’ torture put the whole family a lot of , there is still a great financial for the patients themselves, they would not let to see the family take so many troubles for with the implementation of euthanasia, the patient can reduce the family’s emotional suffering as well as the economic the contrary, some humanists argue that euthanasia shows the indifference and coldness of the family, which results in remote relationships among , in the family’s perspective, it is just because they don’t want the patients to suffer any more that they agree to use euthanasia, which also is a manifestation of their love and care to the patient rather than being coin has two sides, and it is the same with the issue of blame it for the shrinking of responsibility, human coldness and crimes it brings, at the same time many others are calling for the legalization of the above elaborations, and take the consideration of the patients themselves, the family burdens and the social benefits, a conclusion can be drawn that advantages of euthanasia outweigh its , the permission of legalization of euthanasia should be advocated for the sake of the whole [M].上海:上海文化出版社,1988:[M].長春:吉林人民出版社,：“安樂死的現(xiàn)狀與立法”，載《法制與社會發(fā)展》 張暉 《“安樂死”離我們有多遠》載《民主與法制》 Nong ＆ Zhu Xiaoying, a survey and analysis of social attitude toward euthanasia, Journal of Tianjin Manager College, 2009(04). Wangqiang, The Analysis of the Necessity and Practicality of Euthanasia in China, Theory Research, 2010(14). Yingxia, About Euthanasia, Manager Journal, 2009(09). of Western Philology, The People’s Press, 2001: Rawls, A Theory of Justice, China Social and Science Press, 1998:3.第五篇：法醫(yī)學論文安樂死安樂死的意義死亡,自然界的規(guī)律，任何人都無法逃避，在我國法律實踐中仍然以心臟停止跳動為生命終結(jié)的標志。安樂死——對無法救治的病人停止治療或使用藥物，讓病人無痛苦地死去。父母久病，孩子需要在照顧著；親人生病了，親友都要照顧著……親情聯(lián)系著有著血緣關(guān)系的我們。安樂死到底能否實施便成為了一個在熱烈討論中的話題。這并不是對生命的不尊重，更多的這是對自己生存的選擇，對自己尊嚴的捍衛(wèi)。而實施“安樂死”后，這些傷害、壓力就不會那么沉重了。這既不科學又沒有意義和價值，反而是一種浪費。為了自己夠有尊嚴的在這個世界上活著，為了自己逝去的時候更加風輕云淡。保護生者的權(quán)益，對病人實施“安樂死”，會大大減少這些傷害和壓力。利用安樂死的漏洞結(jié)束他人生命。也許是人們對醫(yī)學預防死亡、延長生命的印象太深了，因此很多人認為醫(yī)生的道德責任是救死扶傷，任何安樂死都是不道德