【正文】
f resources, etc., but it is said the power and management base as a spatial plan are relatively weak 。 Territory Planning System of China The Land Management Act (1986), City Planning Act (1989), and the Village and Country Planning Regulations (1993) support Chinese major spatial planning. The petent ministries are classified into the Ministry of Land and Resources , the Ministry of Construction , and the National Development and Reform Commission. Under the Land Management Act the administrative authorities (upper level of prefecture) prepare the CNLUP to classify the future land use and control, to regulate volume of construction site, and to protect farmlands. Under the City Planning Act, the NTCP provides a longrange hierarchy of cities39。很明顯 ,日本國土規(guī)劃分為 NLP 和 CP,而區(qū)域規(guī)劃的影響 是 較小 的 。 CNDP 提供 在全國土地利 用 、 保護和發(fā)展、社會資本 ,交通政策 的概念規(guī)劃 。city planning area39。 迄今為止 ,日本和韓國 的國土規(guī)劃體系 已經(jīng)進行了比較研究 階段 ,但 從 空間規(guī)劃的角度 對 三個國家 的比較研究還未進行。 解決這些 問題 ,重要的 不僅 是對 每個國家的 挑戰(zhàn) ,而是需要 準備一個常見 的 全面覆蓋整個亞洲的空間規(guī)劃 的框架。 Spatial planning。 Key words: National territory plan。本研究的目的是 根據(jù) 城市區(qū)域和非城市 區(qū)域的 分類 , 明確 大空間計劃下 三個國家 在 規(guī)劃中所扮演的角色。 文摘 :本研究是在 進行 中國 、 日本 、 韓國 的 國土規(guī)劃體系 前提下 ,探討 整個 亞洲東部的綜合空間規(guī)劃的可能性 。在日本, 空間規(guī)劃系統(tǒng) 對 城市區(qū)域和非城市地區(qū) 的劃分原則跟中國 是非常相似的 ,這兩種類型的空間規(guī)劃 幾乎沒有 必然的 關系 。 Korea。 Recently it is frequently discussed on the Eastern Asia Community. This is still mainly focused on the economy, but in environmental aspect we also have some mon serious problems , development, biodiversity, outstanding landscape/nature conservation, balanced development of town and country, cultural assets conservation/utilization and several environmental problems. In order to settle these subjects, it is important not only to challenge by each country but also to prepare a mon framework for prehensive spatial planning covering whole eastern Asia.. 最近東亞共同體經(jīng)常被討論, 主要關注 仍然是 經(jīng)濟問題 ,但在環(huán)保方面我們也有一些常見的嚴重 問題 需要解決 ,如可持續(xù)發(fā)展 、 生物 多樣性、優(yōu)秀 景觀 、自然保護 、 城鄉(xiāng)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展、 文化 遺產(chǎn) 保護 、 環(huán)境問題 等 。s major spatial plans into four categories,national, regional, urban area and non urban area, and discussed on the vertical and horizontal relation between them. 本研究之目的 :第一步是 明確日本 、 中國和韓國 的 國土規(guī)劃體系 的異同 ,討論 綜合東亞空間規(guī)劃 的課題和可能性 。 1 National Territory Planning System of Japan The Comprehensive National Development Act(1950), Land Use Planning Act(1974) and City Planning Act (1968) support Japanese major spatial planning (Table 1). These are all under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Land, infrastructure and Transport. The CNDP provides tongrange visions on nationwide land use, development and conservation, social overhead capital, and a traffic policy. According this plan, the CPDP and MLP are to be prepared. The Plans provided by Land Use Planning Act includes NLP and PLP on the perspective of effective national land use and LUMP that classified prefectural land use into five areas (town, agriculture, forest, natural park and natural conservation area). Fig. 1 shows that there are main two spatial plans by two acts at national and regional level, but the relation and a role sharing between the acts and plans of urban area and nonurban area are the MLP by Land Use Planning Act and the CP by City Planning Act, but the relation between the two is not clear and actually the only CP plays a key role to control land use. it is clear that th