【正文】 tive Inquiry, 5(4): 465478. ? Kinchloe, . and McLaren, . (1998) “Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research” in Denzin, N. and Lincoln,Y. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: Sage ? Tsoukas, H. (1989) The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 551561. ? Mabry, L. (2023) Postmodern Evaluation or not? American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2): 141 57. ? Schwandt, . (1996) “Farewell to Criteriology”, Qualitative Inquiry 2(1): 5872. ? Locke, K. and GoldenBiddle, K. (1997) Constructing Opportunities for Contribution: Structuring Intertextual Coherence and “Problematizing” in Organization Studies, Academy of Management Journal, 40(5): 10231062. ? Bedeian, . (2023) Peer Review and the Social Cobstruction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2): 198216. 靜夜四無鄰，荒居舊業(yè)貧。 01:19:3801:19:3801:19Saturday, March 18, 2023 1乍見翻疑夢，相悲各問年。 2023年 3月 18日星期六 1時 19分 38秒 01:19:3818 March 2023 1做前，能夠環(huán)視四周；做時，你只能或者最好沿著以腳為起點的射線向前。 :19:3801:19Mar2318Mar23 1世間成事，不求其絕對圓滿，留一份不足，可得無限完美。 2023年 3月 上午 1時 19分 :19March 18, 2023 1少年十五二十時，步行奪得胡馬騎。 01:19:3801:19:3801:193/18/2023 1:19:38 AM 1越是沒有本領的就越加自命不凡。 :19:3801:19:38March 18, 2023 1意志堅強的人能把世界放在手中像泥塊一樣任意揉捏。 上午 1時 19分 38秒 上午 1時 19分 01:19: MOMODA POWERPOINT Lorem ipsum dolor sit, eleifend nulla ac, fringilla purus. Nulla iaculis tempor felis amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce id urna blanditut cursus. 感謝您的下載觀看 專家告訴 。 2023年 3月 上午 1時 19分 :19March 18, 2023 1業(yè)余生活要有意義，不要越軌。 01:19:3801:19:3801:19Saturday, March 18, 2023 1知人者智，自知者明。 上午 1時 19分 38秒 上午 1時 19分 01:19: 楊柳散和風，青山澹吾慮。 :19:3801:19:38March 18, 2023 1意志堅強的人能把世界放在手中像泥塊一樣任意揉捏。 , March 18, 2023 很多事情努力了未必有結(jié)果，但是不努力卻什么改變也沒有。 2023年 3月 18日星期六 上午 1時 19分 38秒 01:19: 1比不了得就不比，得不到的就不要。 01:19:3801:19:3801:193/18/2023 1:19:38 AM 1以我獨沈久，愧君相見頻。 ? This legitimizes distinctive perspectives, research agendas and promulgates particular evaluation criteria。 e x t e r n a l v a li d it ya n d r e li a b il it y .I n t e r n a ll y r e f lex iv e a u d itt r a il s t o d e m o n s t r a t ec r e d ibil it y , , d e p e n d a b il it y ,c o n f ir m a b il it y a n de c o log ic a l v a li d it y 。 ? Paralogy need to destabilize their own narratives to avoid the a contrived invisibility around the authorial presence behind the text that privileges the text and encourages discursive closure decentring the author。 ? Positivist conception of validity rejected in favour of the credibility of socially constructed realities to those who have democratically participated in their development。 retain social and intellectual distance to preserve analytical space. ? As Seale (1999: 161) through revealing aspects of themselves and the research process as a traceable audit trail, the qualitative researcher persuades readers that they “can rely on the writer’s hard won objectivity” thereby establishing the credibility, dependability and confirmability of findings. ? But a contradiction within neoempiricist interpretive stance and their “immaculate perception” repudiation leads to social constructionist approaches. (3). Critical Theory ? Rejection of theory neutral observational language。 1992) adds to these criteria by developing internal reflexivity ? Researcher39。 ? Synthesizing (identifying patterns in the data)。 (ii) find the same results. Task: Evaluate the different research methods in terms of their relative strengths in regard to the 4 criteria below: C r i ter i a:M e th o d s:Int e rn a lVa li d it yPo p u la t ionVa li d it yC o n s t ru c tVa li d it yR e li a b il it ye .gL a b o r a to r yExpe r i m e n te .g .Su r veyse .g .Acti o n R e