【正文】
? Purchasing and supply scheduling decisions ? Storage fundamentals ? Storage decisions Location Strategy ? Location decisions ? The work planning process PLANNING ORGANIZING CONTROLLING ge/handling decisions CR (2023) Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 存儲(chǔ)決策 Storage Decisions 選址 Site Selection ? Finds a specific real estate site as a storage location ? Weighted checklist is a good approach. Recall, Factor Marginal Factors Weights scores score 1 2 5 10 2 9 1 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4 8 32 Weighted score 286 4 Storage Decisions (Cont’d) S iz ing t he F ac ility ? From in ventory poli cy, de term in e th e amount of in ventory t o be st ored, that is, sp ace nee de d ? De term in e t he facil ity’ s seasonal use ? Ba la nc e t he use of pri vately owned space w ith rented space — a m ixe d st rategy CR (2023) Prentice Hall, Inc. 5 設(shè)計(jì)與運(yùn)作規(guī)劃 ? 確定設(shè)施的規(guī)模 ? 簡(jiǎn)單地說(shuō),規(guī)模是指?jìng)}庫(kù)建筑的總?cè)莘e——長(zhǎng)、寬和高。目前的出貨量直接來(lái)自紐約的制造商。 ? 數(shù)值低的貨物應(yīng)盡可能靠近出貨點(diǎn)放置。 Direct shipments Manuf a cture r Cu stom er S hipping volum e, lb. Tran sp ort rate, $/cwt. Tran sp ort co st, $ Ne w Y or k B oston 10,000 $1,742 Ne w Y or k Clevelan d 12,000 2,894 Ne w Y or k Dalla s 8,000 4,177 Ne w Y or k S eatt le 10,000 5,709 40,000 To tal $14,522 CR (2023) Prentice Hall, Inc. 13 設(shè)施評(píng)價(jià) Facility Evaluation Suppose a pool point at St. Louis is being considered to lower transportation costs between manufacturer and its customers. Shipments currently are made directly from the manufacturer’s inventory in New York. There is a $10/cwt. handling charge at the pool point. Direct shipments Manuf a cture r Cu stom er S hipping volum e, lb. Tran sp ort rate, $/cwt. Tran sp ort co st, $ Ne w Y or k B oston 10,000 $1,742 Ne w Y or k Clevelan d 12,000 2,894 Ne w Y or k Dalla s 8,000 4,177 Ne w Y or k S eatt le 10,000 5,709 40,000 To tal $14,522 CR (2023) Prentice Hall, Inc. 14 Facility Evaluation (Cont’d) Shipments through pool point New York t o St Louis Inbound cost, $ From pool point t o custom er s at Transp or t ra te, $/cw t. Outbou nd cost. $ Total transpo rt cost, $ 400 cwt. cw t. Boston 4,172 Clevelan d 1,514 Da lla s 820 Seat tle 2 ,706 Totals $6,260 $9,212 $15,472 Now, add handling cost of $10/cwt. ? 400 cwt. = $4,000 for a total cost of $15,472 + 4,000 = $19,472. Conclusion No benefit to using the pool point. CR (2023) Prentice Hall, Inc. 15 When is a Pool Point Likely to be an Advantage? ?當(dāng)裝運(yùn)規(guī)模小 ?當(dāng)需求短缺 ?當(dāng)運(yùn)輸?shù)慕?jīng)濟(jì)性是重要的 ?當(dāng)池點(diǎn)(中轉(zhuǎn)庫(kù))的運(yùn)營(yíng)成本相對(duì)于運(yùn)輸成本比較低 ?對(duì)服務(wù)而言,轉(zhuǎn)運(yùn)時(shí)間不重要 CR (2023) Prentice Hall, Inc. 16 When is a Pool Point Likely to be an Advantage? ?When shipment sizes are small ?When demand is far from source points ?When transportation rate economies are significant ?When pool point operating costs are low relative to transportation costs ?When transfer times are insignificant to service CR (2023) Prentic