一些英文審稿意見(jiàn)及回復(fù)的模板(已修改)
2025-08-15 07:19 本頁(yè)面
【正文】 一些英文審稿意見(jiàn)的模板最近在審一篇英文稿，第一次做這個(gè)工作，還有點(diǎn)不知如何表達(dá)。幸虧遇上我的處女審稿，我想不會(huì)槍斃它的，給他一個(gè)major revision后接收吧。呵呵網(wǎng)上找來(lái)一些零碎的資料參考參考。+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++目標(biāo)和結(jié)果不清晰。It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.未解釋研究方法或解釋不充分。In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.對(duì)于研究設(shè)計(jì)的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.夸張地陳述結(jié)論/夸大成果/不嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.對(duì)hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。對(duì)某個(gè)概念或工具使用的rationale/定義概念：What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?對(duì)研究問(wèn)題的定義：Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,write one section to define the problem如何凸現(xiàn)原創(chuàng)性以及如何充分地寫(xiě)literature review:The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.對(duì)claim,如A＞B的證明，verification:There is no experimental parison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)度問(wèn)題：MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.1格式（重視程度）：In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not pletely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples.Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the Instructions and Forms button in he upper righthand corner of the screen.1語(yǔ)言問(wèn)題（出現(xiàn)最多的問(wèn)題）：有關(guān)語(yǔ)言的審稿人意見(jiàn)：It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service before submission。 only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not plete sentences.As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction.The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is wellversed in English or whose native language is English.Please have someone petent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it ?the quality of English needs improving. 作為審稿人，本不應(yīng)該把編輯部的這些信息公開(kāi)（冒風(fēng)險(xiǎn)啊），但我覺(jué)得有些意見(jiàn)值得廣大投稿人注意，就貼出來(lái)吧，當(dāng)然，有關(guān)審稿人的名字，Email，文章題名信息等就都刪除了，以免造成不必要的麻煩！希望朋友們多評(píng)價(jià)，其他有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的審稿人能常來(lái)指點(diǎn)大家！，被塞爾維亞一審稿人打25分！個(gè)人認(rèn)為文章還是有一些創(chuàng)新的，所以作為審稿人我就給了66分，（這個(gè)分正常應(yīng)該足以發(fā)表），提了一些修改意見(jiàn)，望作者修改后發(fā)表！登錄到編輯部網(wǎng)頁(yè)一看，一個(gè)文章竟然有六個(gè)審稿人，詳細(xì)看了下打的分?jǐn)?shù)，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但沒(méi)有打分（另一國(guó)人審），最后一個(gè)沒(méi)有回來(lái)！兩個(gè)拒的是需要我們反思和學(xué)習(xí)的?。ɡㄌ?hào)斜體內(nèi)容為我注解）Reviewer 4Reviewer Remendation Term: RejectOverall Reviewer Manuscript Rating: 25Comments to Editor: Reviewers are required to enter their name, affiliation and address below. Please note this is for administrative purposes and will not be seen by the author.Title (Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.): Prof.Name: XXXAffiliation:
數(shù)學(xué)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1