【正文】 新CET4寫作講義北京新東方學(xué)校：王江濤歡迎使用新東方在線電子教材前言開(kāi)場(chǎng)白推薦兩本書：
《圣經(jīng)》《古希臘羅馬神話》一共分為四節(jié)課，第一節(jié)課：
1）考試題型；2）考試要求；3）評(píng)卷實(shí)例第 一 節(jié)一、考試題型 應(yīng)用文（7考）：口頭作文（2考）、書信作文（5考） 論說(shuō)文（25考）：提綱作文（23考）、圖表作文（2考） 段首句作文：4考 課程安排：1） 考試題型、考試要求、評(píng)卷實(shí)例2） 口頭作文、書信總論3） 書信詳解4） 論說(shuō)文、翻譯 學(xué)習(xí)方法：實(shí)力（高分策略）＋技巧（萬(wàn)能框架）二、考試要求《大學(xué)英語(yǔ)考試大綱》中明確規(guī)定：四級(jí)大學(xué)英語(yǔ)寫作考試時(shí)間為30分鐘。要求應(yīng)試者寫出一篇不少于120個(gè)詞的短文；寫作命題源于日常生活和有關(guān)科技、社會(huì)文化等方面的一般常識(shí)，不涉及知識(shí)面過(guò)廣、專業(yè)性太強(qiáng)的內(nèi)容。其命題方式有：給出題目、或規(guī)定情景、或給出段首句續(xù)寫、或給出關(guān)鍵詞寫短文、或看圖作文。要求內(nèi)容切題，文理通順，表達(dá)正確，語(yǔ)義連貫，無(wú)重大語(yǔ)言錯(cuò)誤。 時(shí)間要求：30分鐘1） 審題（3分鐘）：2） 寫作（25分鐘）：3） 檢查（2分鐘）：語(yǔ)法（時(shí)態(tài)、冠詞、主謂一致）、拼寫、標(biāo)點(diǎn)【】For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay [IN honour of teachers on the occasion of Teacher39。s Day]. You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below:
1. 向老師表達(dá)節(jié)日祝賀
2. 從一件小事來(lái)回憶老師的教誨和無(wú)私的奉獻(xiàn)
3. 我如何回報(bào)老師的關(guān)愛(ài) 字?jǐn)?shù)要求：120－150詞 寫作主題：大學(xué)校園生活（學(xué)習(xí)、生活、工作） 命題方式：段首句、提綱、命題、關(guān)鍵詞、情景、圖表作文 具體要求：1） 語(yǔ)言第一位：表達(dá)通順、無(wú)重大語(yǔ)言錯(cuò)誤（1） 基礎(chǔ)一般：簡(jiǎn)單原則、安全第一（2） 基礎(chǔ)較好：句子結(jié)構(gòu)詞多變2） 結(jié)構(gòu)第二位：（1） 邏輯性：A. 并列：and/or/butB. 因果：because/in that, since/as, forC. 轉(zhuǎn)折：but/however（2） 關(guān)聯(lián)詞： 3） 內(nèi)容第三位：切題Last night, I was kicked by my girl friend. She ran away with a small white face. She is my green plum and bamboo horse. Now I know that love is blind. Beauty is but skindeep. Money is the root of evil. However, I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. Could you please tell my why the injured is always me. It is high time that you teachers devoted your love to me. If you do not give me full mark, I will mit suicide immediately.三、評(píng)卷實(shí)例1 教材第5頁(yè)第1篇：中英思維差異1） 中式思維：情感分段、讀者領(lǐng)會(huì)、迂回模式、歸納式思維2） 英式思維：邏輯分段、作者交代、直線模式、演繹式思維 1999年1月真題 例文（1） 講解 Most people thought that read books should have been selectived. But others belived reading extentively was correction. Selective books or reading extensively? Sure, you can choice one from previous ideas, on one hand, There are too book to read for us. We should choose those which we intrested, and it would be helpful for us. on another hand. Someone39。s intresting was wide. Each book could bring you specific contain we couldn39。t reading at only one level. I confirmed all of these ideas were good but weren39。t wise. As a reader, the main task is to discover more and more books the second task is to held some which wonderful and helpful for us. Don39。t treat these books with rackless abandon. The best technology of reading is connect. 1 教材第4頁(yè)第2篇：1999年1月真題 例文（2） 講解 I think reading not only selectively but also extensively. Because the two sides are not contradict. Our time is limited. So we can not read every book in the world. However, we will not be interested in every book. We should read those books may be useful to ours, read those books which we like. But those books which we choose must be extensively so it can give ours all kinds of knowledge, news and so on, it also make ours bee a wise man. On the one hand reading selectively let ours not waste our time which it is limitted. Moreover it can emphasis among all books that we can read. On the other hand reading extensively can deal with all kinds of need in our life. They are all useful to ours.1 教材第5頁(yè)第3篇：1999年1月真題 例文（3） 講解Some people think reading shall be choosed. Because some books are good to hummen beings and some books are harmful to people. Some people think that men shoud read books widely. Because wide reading can help man get much knowledge. And man can use it to change the world.It is my point that reading must be selectively. Because reading is important to man. Some books can help man but some books can lead some people to crime. It can be seen in the newspapers and watched on TV. We can make full use of some good books and gain more useful knowledge. It can make our life more beautiful. we must give up those unhelpful books. They are not good to us. Reading them is wasting time and money. So reading selectively is an important part in reading.1 教材第5頁(yè)第2篇：1999年1月真題 例文（4） 講解How should we read? Should we read selectively or extensively? Everyone has his own view.Some people think we should read selectively. They argue that with the development of modern science and technology, more and more books are published. It is impossible for us to read all the books. What39。s more, there are many bad books that are poisonous to our mind, and we shouldn39。t read them. Since we can39。t read all the books and we shouldn39。t read bad books, we must read selectively. But others may not agree. They emphasize that today39。s society is not what it was. If one man has many kinds of knowledge he39。ll have more chances to succeed. If a man knows much in one field but knows nothing in other fields, he may be useless. Since we must have many kinds of knowledge, we must read extensively.Who39。s right? I think both of them have something right. But I think we should read extensively first. We should read books in many fields, and read selectively in one field.1 教材第4頁(yè)第1篇：1999年1月真題 例文（5） 講解 When it es to reading, some people think that reading selectively is a good way, but some other people do not agree with them, they think that reading extensively is better. Those people, who think that reading selectively is better, believe that good books are as many as bad books. Those good books can give us pleasure and knowledge, while those bad books can only lead us to the wrong way. So, they suggest that we should only choose the good books to read and never touch the bad books. But, the other people, who hold that reading extensively is better, think that one kind of books can only give us one aspect of knowledge. Even the best book only contains one field of information. So, they can easily e to the conclusion that to know more, to read more. So they believe that reading extensively is better. To my point, we should choose good books to read and read good books as many as possible. By this way, we