【正文】
ad一類的詞語進行價值評判。一會顯得措辭魯莽,二會顯得過于主觀。所以這里推薦使用sth. be/not be a proper way to do sth. else. 以顯示客觀中立。第二段講了對出位的認識。文章沒有直接講這種行為的優(yōu)點或缺點,而是從追求成功的角度闡釋一個人應該具備目標、達到目標的方法和堅持不懈的毅力。言下之意是間接否定了出位。比較好的表達有:明確的目標(crystalclear goal),社會完整(the wholesomeness of the society),充分利用(make the most of ),志在必得(sth. is within one’s reach.)。最后一段是重申主題和作者的立場。預測作文(三)Marriage: Is it still a tradition?1. 剩男剩女越來越多。2. 傳統(tǒng)的成家立業(yè)、結(jié)婚思想是否會發(fā)生變化?3. 未來社會是否會有更多的人選擇不結(jié)婚,單身過日子,談談你的看法。【范文】Marriage, what a holy and inspiring word for human beings is. However, with the passage of time, the concept of marriage changes dramatically, as can be seen from the increasing numbers of single men and women in contemporary society.From my perspective, this interesting phenomenon well reflects the young’s value shift in the aspect of marriage, family and so forth. First, the substantial development of our nation’s economy greatly changes the way young people treat marriage. They are more financially independent and attempt to seek individual freedom. Second, young people are being growingly petitive that they subconsciously raise the standards of their ideal partners, which lead to the fact that many find it hard to find their perfect matches.As far as I am concerned, I strongly believe that single life is not the main trend in the long run for both men and women, because marriage can bring a lot happiness to us. Accordingly, the future of marriage will still be promising.【點評】首句欲抑先揚,指出婚姻是holy and inspiring(神圣并振奮人心的)。接著通過轉(zhuǎn)折詞however, 狀語with the passage of time,非限制性定語從句和被動語態(tài)as can be seen的使用,使句子結(jié)構(gòu)豐富,并不失連貫性與邏輯性。第二段講述了年輕人婚姻觀發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變的社會和個人原因。最后一段表達自己對婚姻樂觀積極的觀點。值得一提的是此文中的副詞和狀語。副詞如dramatically, greatly, financially, growingly, subconsciously, strongly等使它們修飾的動詞和形容詞更加形象生動;另外,中文里的動詞在英語中通??梢杂酶痹~和狀語來處理。如第一段中的with the passage of time(隨著時間的流逝)。預測作文(四)Government Officials and Their Words1. 最近不斷有官員爆出“雷人”話語,令人咋舌。2. 你如何看待這種現(xiàn)象?3. 請反思這種現(xiàn)象背后的原因。【范文】It is reported that floods of stunning words have burst into our society out of the mouths of some government officials. Some of those words are really astonishing and audacious, which arouse significant concern among the public.As for me, I think that there are two major reasons accounting for this controversial issue. One is the misinterpretation of the mass media. It is universally acknowledged that lots of media exaggerate or uglify the facts in order to gain more attention from the public and achieve more profit. So they may have defamed some of the remarks made by the government officials so as to win the mass attention. Another reason is the government officials themselves. It