【正文】
9BondingCars ChinaSantana Brand Pyramid(Base) (398)664336160Cars ChinaRed Flag BrandPyramid(398)Ogilvy amp。 Mather ? 很明顯 , 桑塔納在總體上勝過奧迪和紅旗, 這和它在市場上的歷史和普及率相關 Ogilvy amp。 Mather 消費者是否認為我們的價格太貴 ? 24Average4Santana5VW ( Volkswagen)14Toyota15Mazda20Red Flag23General Motors (GM)25Audi28Ford29Jaguar39BMW40Mercedes45ChryslerChina CarsOgilvy amp。 Mather ? 我們的價格在上述品牌中被認知是最合理的 , 低于平均值 20個百分點 ? 桑塔納作為經(jīng)濟實惠耐用的家用轎車 , 應是其未來持久的定位 Ogilvy amp。 Mather 消費者如何看我們 ? ? This Brand Dynamics Pyramid and the underlying methodologies are the copyright of Millward Brown 65Aware of promise44Meets needs11Ever tried74UnaidedChina CarsSantana %(Base) (398)2422632Santana v Category(398)155223Audi v Category(398)Ogilvy amp。 Mather ? 知名度相當高 (未提示 74%) ? 對品牌的承諾了解較充分 ( 65%, 高于平均值 24%) Ogilvy amp。 Mather 他們?nèi)绾慰次覀?? ? This Brand Dynamics Pyramid and the underlying methodologies are the copyright of Millward Brown 11More stylish5Different21Setting trends20Want to be seen22Better quality30Growing popular28Better to drive30Higher opinion30Would remend36Appeals more23Most popular51Better price/dealCars ChinaSantana %(Base) (219)13810111137742425Santana v Category(219)211131411533Audi v Category(191)Ogilvy amp。 Mather Diagnosis of Bonding (Which factors contribute to Bonding for the Brand ranked by importance) ? This Brand Dynamics Pyramid and the underlying methodologies are the copyright of Millward Brown 6More stylish3Different