【正文】 ent countries； social housing as a universalistic and a safety model are distinguished for the universalistic model a difference can be made between social housing as for employees and housing for all (Czischke 2021； Whitehead 2021).Ghekie`re (2021) provides a typology for social housing in distinguishes three first is the residual concept striving to cope with a clearly outlined social demand that is restricted to the most disadvantaged persons who are generally excluded from a housing market characterized by a strong predominance of home owner occupation and a non regulated private rental second is the generalist concept. Globalisation has further affected the sentiments of governments towards the global market and induced them to modernise their institutional arrangements in order to be able to pete in the global economic environment. This implies targeting a social demand but to a larger extent of public intervention， this concept has an impact on the housing supply namely in terms of price and last concept is the universal concept is intended to guarantee the housing supply for the entire population with both a plementary offer to what the market provides and the regulation of the entire housing market. Flemish Social Rented Sector In an International Perspective How does the Flemish social rental sector pare to social renting in other countries?This section describes Flanders in an international perspective by paring it with five other countries； some of them with small social rental sectors (Ireland， Spain and Germany)， others with larger sector (UK and Netherlands) (see Winters et ).The aim is to describe different features of the social rental sector in these countries， searching for the differences and signs of dual and unitary models. In the Netherlands and the UK， the social rented sector occupies a larger market share， % and 20% of the housing stock， as shown in Table both countries，we see a trend towards a decline in social rented dwellings owned by the the Netherlands， the municipal housing panies have virtually disappeared and， in the UK， the number of RSLs (registered social landlords) is gradually currently manage 6% of the UK housing difference between the UK and the Netherlands is that the social rented sector fulfils a safety function in the former case and， in the latter， it is accessible to many target groups. In Spain， Germany and Ireland， as in Flanders， the social rented sector is modest in scope， varying between 3% and 9%.However， major differences exist between the social rented sectors in these Germany and Spain， a dynamic social rented sector exists， which is managed by private are built with a subsidy and kept affordable for a certain period and they are also the subject of dwelling allocation the end of this period， these dwellings are Ireland，the social rented sector fulfils the function of a social safety and the sector is owned by local social rented