【正文】 sen? Section 8 Project Resources... What are the qualifications of our team? 2 169。 1999 Arthur Andersen, Andersen Worldwide SC. All rights reserved. Our Understanding of Your Needs The key deliverables to meet your objectives for this phase of the project will be: ? High level business process maps ? Process Improvement Opportunities ? Software requirements and “knockout” criteria ? Functional ? Technical ? Vendor ? List of potential software candidates ? Vendor demonstration scripts ? Software selection remendation ? Software, hardware and services cost estimates ? Highlevel implementation plan ? Organizational impact assessment Section 1: Introduction Deliverables 4 169。Q A D M fg / r S A PS S A B P C S S y m ixSSHigh Tech Mfg. Custom Products Mfg. Custom Products Mfg. Automotive Supplier Consumer Products Mfg. 5 169。 SSA Section 2: Project Overview 6 169。 1999 Arthur Andersen, Andersen Worldwide SC. All rights reserved. Our Perspective Business Integration Holistic Business Integration Approach Implementation of any significant change requires the integration of strategy, business processes, people, and information technology. Application software must be evaluated within the context of this business integration concept to have relevance. Section 2: Project Overview ? How to: ? Transfer/improve skills ? Speed up actions ? Flatten structures ? Empower individuals ? Improve service ? Leverage knowledge capital ? How to: ? Simplify/eliminate ? Do things more quickly ? Reduce costs ? Decentralize decisions ? Capitalize on technology ? Restructure relationships ? What focus ? What core activities ? What geographical areas ? How to: ? Organize internally ? Achieve synergy ? Capitalize on strengths ? How to: ? Enable business change ? Migrate to better solutions ? Focus on core activities and people ? Capitalize on/share best practices ? Integrate information across functions ? Centrally monitor a decentralized business 8 169。 1999 Arthur Andersen, Andersen Worldwide SC. All rights reserved. Project Approach Evaluation Components During the software evaluation process, the field of potential software solutions is quickly narrowed to two. These two vendors demonstrate their products and are evaluated by the selection team. The final product is selected based on the demonstration results, contract considerations, and further analysis as described below. All Software Candidates 15+ Candidates 2 Finalists Industry Insight Market Research Vendor Viability Arthur Andersen Firmwide Knowledge 35 Candidates Functional Fit Vendor Viability Final Selection Technology Use Vision References Site Visits Implementation Costs Pricing Negotiations RFI responses, screening interviews Detailed Knockout Criteria, Company size, Market Presence, AA Insight (Plaskolite and Arthur Andersen) High Level Knockout Criteria Preliminary Screening (Arthur Andersen) Software demonstrations, reference checks, negotiations, and Cost / Benefit Analysis (Plaskolite Arthur Andersen) The vendors execute the scripts during their demonstrations。 1999 Arthur Andersen, Andersen Worldwide SC. All rights reserved. Software Evaluation Lessons Learned Our approach works to plement the business knowledge of Plaskolite with the industry knowledge, technical expertise, and “best practice” work of Arthur Andersen. A package will not be embraced by Plaskolite if it is chosen solely by Arthur Andersen. We will facilitate Plaskolite through our methodology to ensure a partnering endeavor based on your agenda. Communicate that no package will meet every perceived need and that perceptions must change. Sell the idea that nothing will improve unless it changes. Ensure the demonstration audience understands that vendors want to show their strengths, not necessarily what is best for Plaskolite. Facilitate the demonstrations accordingly. Ensure references are in similar industries with similar volumes and are using the product (not testing or ready to rollout). Ensure the anization understands that package software implementation projects are more expensive and provide less relative benefit than strategic, petitive initiatives。 1999 Arthur Andersen, Andersen Worldwide SC. All rights reserved. Ongoing Project Scope Approach Arthur Andersen’s packaged software methodology framework consists of 6 major phases while emphasizing an aggressive program of project management and change enablement. This proposal addresses the first 3 phases of work. At the pletion of these phases, we will take a checkpoint with Plaskolite’s management to determine Arthur Andersen’s involvement with future phases of work. “ Where do we want to be?” “ What tools will we use?” “ How will we use the tools?” “ Construct and rollout the solution.” “ How will we get there?” People Processes Technology Strategy Requirements Definition Software Evaluation Selection Design Business Process Simulation Implementation Support Continuous Improvement Implementation Planning “ Stabilize and prioritize.” Checkpoint Checkpoint Checkpoint 56 weeks 34 months 58 months Project Management and Change Enablement = within scope of this proposal = future phases Checkpoint 34 weeks 2 weeks Checkpoint Software Selection and Implementation Software Selection Software Implementation Section 3: Project Approach The scope of this project will be limited to the evaluation and selection of a single integrated software package. 12 169。 1999 Arthur Andersen, Andersen Worldwide SC. All rights reserved. Project Approach Requirements Definition The purpose of this phase is to gather busine