【正文】
5 169。 1999 Andersen Consulting Best in Class panies enjoy significant advantage over their petitors. Total SupplyChain Mgmt. Cost “ For a pany with annual sales of $2 billion and a 60% cost of sales, the difference between being at the median in terms of performance and being in the top 20% is $176 million in working capital.” 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 1996 1997 Revenue Best Median 37 31 87 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1996 1997 Calendar Days CashtoCash Cycle Time 105 1997 PRTM Study 7 169。 1999 Andersen Consulting For period 19881996。 1999 Andersen Consulting Inventory Turns 50 times per year The 1997 Andersen Consulting Global Electronics Study (GES) showed that total inventory in the . technology industry supply chain was around $ trillion and turned less than 10 times per year. Supply Chain Opportunities for EHT Industry Still, there are potential Inventory Reduction Opportunities ? 1030% Interenterprise Postponement ? 1030% Intraenterprise Postponement ? 4065% DirecttoCustomer Sales ? 1025% Joint (Collaborative) Planning Source: ACStanfordNorthwestern’s CDDN Study, also 1996 . Census data 10 169。 1999 Andersen Consulting Substantial value creation has been identified for puter supply chain. Andersen Consulting’s CDDN Study Benefits Summary Suppliers Semic. Storage Assemblers Distributors Retailers Inv. Margin Value 10%70% 10%100% .7%% .5%% $70$470M $10$102M Inv. Margin Value Inv. Margin Value 10%70% 10%100% % % % $69M $18M $145M Compressed Supply Chain Collaborative Planning Design for Responsiveness 10%25% 10%25% 10%25% 10%25% 10%25% .6%% .6%% .7%% .5%% .7%% $9$23M $4$9M $70$181M $10$26M $26$64M 12 169。 1999 Andersen Consulting Which should e first? SCM or ERP? Customer Value Supply chain planning ERP Global financials Low High Ticket to Entry LowHanging Fruit Hard Nut to Crack Narcissistic Time to Produce Net Value Warehouse mgmt. Short Long S o u r c e : G a r t n e r G r o u p , 1998 SCM ERP ROI (times) 5 to 15 to 2 Payback in 2 to 3 Period months years Achieving internal efficiencies is important, however, the external integration can make the difference between market leadership and failure. High returns from external integration can be achieved even when internal integration is not very sophisticated. It isn’t necessary to wait until your internal integration efforts are plete to begin extern