gre寫作官方范文分析匯總-在線瀏覽
2025-05-10 00:29本頁(yè)面
【正文】 in the thinking process and consider whether the movement from each one to the next is logically sound。 在分析時(shí)：You will not be expected to know methods of analysis or technical ，幾乎是沒有那種像新東方那樣精確錯(cuò)誤名詞的，而只是就著錯(cuò)誤本身的邏輯進(jìn)行分析。 awintro中舉一個(gè)例子：For instance, in one topic an elementary school principal might conclude that the new playground equipment has improved student attendance because absentee rates have declined since it was ：(1)意識(shí)到存在它因you will simply need to see that there are other possible explanations for the improved attendance,(2)提供具體的它因 to offer some monsense examples, (3)從結(jié)論考慮，怎樣才能使論證完整有力，即如何改進(jìn)and perhaps to suggest what would be necessary to verify the conclusion. For instance, absentee rates might have decreased because the climate was mild. This would have to be ruled out in order for the principal’s conclusion to be valid. 官方認(rèn)為的有幾個(gè)關(guān)鍵名詞需要解釋，其中analysis這個(gè)詞的解釋很重要，很多同學(xué)知道這個(gè)詞的意思是分析，但什么是分析就說(shuō)得不是很清楚了。說(shuō)白了，就是把原題中的三段式論證給打拆開，逐一地進(jìn)行分析?！ 『诵恼撟C方法：找出隱含假設(shè)(并質(zhì)疑)identify as many of its claims, conclusions, and underlying assumptions as possible。加條件后討論think of what additional evidence might weaken or lend support to the claims。同學(xué)們以上四點(diǎn)是核心論證方法!!!所有的滿分范文中都用到了這四種方法。這里重要的是加上一個(gè)常識(shí)性條件后，能意識(shí)到，有些情況，是支持原命題的。 滿分作文的模式：essays at the 6 score level that begin by briefly summarizing the argument and then explicitly stating and developing the main points of the critique?！ 「叻肿魑牡墓繇樞颍篩ou might want to organize your critique around the organization of the argument itself, discussing the argument line by line. Or you might want to first point out a central questionable assumption and then move on to discuss related flaws in the argument39。所以這里比較好的方案是先質(zhì)疑一個(gè)核心的假設(shè)，然后再按照原文邏輯來(lái)搞?！ enchmark 6 The notion that protective gear reduces the injuries suffered in accidents seems at first glance to be an obvious conclusion. After all, it is the intent of these products to either prevent accidents from occuring in the first place or to reduce the injuries suffered by the wearer should an accident occur. 前兩句首先肯定了原命題中值得肯定的地方。注意這里第一句作者同意原命題的同時(shí)，在第二句緊接著就給出了展開的證明。However, the conclusion that investing in high quality protective gear greatly reduces the risk of being severely injured in an accident may mask other (and potentially more significant) causes of injuries and may inspire people to over invest financially and psychologically in protective gear. 再說(shuō)原命題是存在邏輯漏洞的，即它因。同時(shí)，最后半句給出了論據(jù)中的潛在后果。論證方法為質(zhì)疑假設(shè)，加條件后討論，提出建議。深層的含義就是，盡管我在開頭對(duì)你的某一個(gè)部分作了讓步似的同意，但是這個(gè)同意也是建立在一定的假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)上的，要是這個(gè)假設(shè)搞不清楚，哼哼我讓不讓步還不一定呢!本段就來(lái)討論這個(gè)假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)。論證方法為加上不同的條件后進(jìn)行討論，比如前一句話假定只有防護(hù)性裝備會(huì)怎樣，后一句話假定只有保護(hù)性裝備會(huì)怎么樣。These statistics could provide skaters with a clearer understanding of which kinds of gear are more beneficial. 如果這個(gè)問題(保護(hù)防護(hù)設(shè)備的差別)解決了后面的討論才能繼續(xù)。轉(zhuǎn)載自:考試大 [] The argument above is weakened by the fact that it does not take into account the inherent differences between skaters who wear gear and those who do ，連著的三個(gè)自然段就是按照原文邏輯鏈的順序進(jìn)行攻擊和質(zhì)疑。本段先質(zhì)疑了人的本質(zhì)的差異。If is at least likely that those who wear gear may be generally more responsible and/or safety conscious individuals. The skaters who wear gear may be less likely to cause acci
范文總結(jié)相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1