【正文】 標及主要任務(wù)本論文的研究目標是探討《雙城記》中卡頓這一人物形象悲劇表現(xiàn)的三個方面，以及其悲劇形成的原因，和體現(xiàn)作者的思想。其主要任務(wù)是通過研究卡頓的悲劇來弘揚作者的人道主義精神。論文（設(shè)計）的基礎(chǔ)條件及研究路線 本論文的基礎(chǔ)條件是小說所呈現(xiàn)的主題，以及學(xué)者們對《雙城記》的研究。主要參考文獻Dickens, Charles. A tale of two cities. Qingdao: Qingdao Press, 2005.Collins, Philip. Dickens: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge, 1971.Hardy, Barbara. British Writers. London: British Council, 1982狄更斯，2011，《雙城記》，張玲 張揚譯. 上海：上海譯文出版社. 賀潤東，2011，卡頓的救贖—《雙城記》中博愛精神的體現(xiàn). 《綿陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報》2011年第4期，23—25頁.計劃進度階段起止日期1確定初步論文題目3月16日前2與導(dǎo)師見面，確定大致范圍，填開題報告和任務(wù)書，導(dǎo)師簽字3月16日3月23日3提交論文提綱3月23日3月30日4交初稿和文獻綜述3月30日4月20日5交終稿和評議書5月8日前指 導(dǎo) 教師： 年 月 日教研室主任： 年 月 日注：一式三份，學(xué)院（系）、指導(dǎo)教師、學(xué)生各一份XX大學(xué)本科生畢業(yè)論文（設(shè)計）開題報告書XX 學(xué)院 英語教育 專業(yè) XX 屆學(xué)生姓名XX論文（設(shè)計）題目《雙城記》中卡頓的悲劇指導(dǎo)教師XX專業(yè)職稱 XX所屬教研室英語高年級教研組研究方向英美文學(xué)課題論證：從卡頓的愛情，事業(yè)，生活三個方面悲劇的表現(xiàn)和形成的原因，來謳歌主人公的大義凜然，無私奉獻的精神，從而弘揚作者狄更斯的人道主義精神。 進度計劃：3月16日前確定初步論文題目 3月30日前寫開題報告、任務(wù)書3月30日前提交論文提綱4月20日前提交初稿和文獻綜述5月8日前交終稿和評議書指導(dǎo)教師意見： 指導(dǎo)教師簽名： 年 月 日教研室意見： 教研室主任簽名： 年 月 日XX大學(xué)本科生畢業(yè)論文（設(shè)計）評議書姓 名XX學(xué)院XX學(xué)院專業(yè)英語教育年級（班）XX級英語教育一班論 文 題 目《雙城記》中卡頓的悲劇完成時間2013年4月29日論文內(nèi)容摘要《雙城記》是英國作家查爾斯故事中將巴黎，倫敦兩城市連接起來，通過對各種人物的遭遇及其人性的剖析，展現(xiàn)了人道主義視野下革命的合理性和暴力的瘋狂性。卡頓，一個最能代表狄更斯的人道主義思想的理想化的人物，在這部小說中是真正的主角，是悲劇化的英雄。 本論文將通過分析卡頓的短暫卻令人惋惜和感動的一生，來探討他人生的悲劇。首先是卡頓愛情的悲劇，深愛的人卻愛著別人，而自己那看似卑微的愛，卻不愿意為自己爭取幸福。最后是卡頓的人生悲劇，一個外表看起來懶惰的經(jīng)常酗酒的被人忽略被人輕視的律師助理，愿意為了愛，為了他人，而犧牲自己的生命，這是美麗的悲劇。指導(dǎo)教師評語 年 月 日指 導(dǎo) 教 師職稱初評成績答辯小組姓名職稱教研室組長成員答辯記錄： 記錄人簽字： 年 月 日答辯小組意見： 組長簽字： 年 月 日學(xué)院意見： 評定成績： 簽章 年 月 日XX大學(xué)本科生畢業(yè)論文（設(shè)計）文獻綜述Literature ReviewSince A Tale of Two Citiesnovel, as Charles Dickens’s masterpiece was published in installments in All The Year Round in 1859, critics have studied it from various aspects. Comments on the novel may have three sorts. First, those that are the point of view of the historical novel or not—some critics have thought so, but others haven’t. Second, those that are on the study of humanitarianism and most of critics have agreed with the point. Third, those that on textual artistic style and most of critics have thought the novel are the exception in Dickensian novels. Especially, the second one is the hottest one that many critics are interest in. Sydney Carton is the Ⅰ The Reviews from Abroad When the novel was born, his friend and biographer, John Forster argued that “there was probably never a book by a great humorist, and an artist so prolific in the conception of character, with so little humor and so few remember able figures.” It is worth pointing out that while Charles Dickens is often very funny, this book is not. This is really one of his most serious works. There39。s also one of his more emotionally satisfying books and one of his least sentimental. Stephen wrote an essay on A Tale of two cities in The Saturday Review, London. In the essay, Stephen thought: In the Tale of Two Cities, Mr. Dickens has reached the Castle Dangerous stage without Sir Walter Scott’s excuse。 Pritchard concluded the point of view of some critics that the novel is the author’s autobiography and agreed that: Sydney Carton and Charles Darnay, two main characters, portray different sides of Dickens’ initials, tires to shed his family’s past but can not hide from its reach. Sydney Carton redeems himself through his love for Lucie Manette. These two versions of Dickens are unified in the novel, and they show the destructive power of the past and the healing power of love and sacrifice. In the 21st century, Petch mainly argued The Business of the Barrister in A Tale of Two Cites. In the essay, Simon Petch declared that A Tale of Two Cities is the story of one lawyer, Sydney Carton, and his selfsacrificing love for one woman, in the context of his relations with several other professional men, at the time of the French Revolution. From the above, these critics studied A Tale of Two Cities from varied aspects, especially from history, autobiography, archetype, etc. Long before created A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens showed great solicitude for the French Revolution and retreaded an English historian, Thomas Carlyle’s The French Revolution. So in this novel, another writer can be seen. It is Tomas Carlyle. In Ruth Glancy’s Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities a sourcebook, he puts much importance on the Revolution. But everyone who has researched the novel knows that characters are much important than the background. In this novel, he also makes clear the characters in this novel through their actions rather than dialogue. Novelist E. M. Forster famously criticized Dickens’s characters as “flat,” lamenting that they seem to lack the depth and plexity that make literary characters realistic and believable. Sydney Carton is a flat character. He is just a drunken lawyer who works for “the lion”. Karis Marie Kalil wrote On Dickens’ a tale of two cities “He represents the sacrificial hero who ritually slaughtered of his own free will so that society might renew itself, a prospect he envisions before he dies.” Dickens writes a shocking tragedy and makes Sydney Carton, his cynical and charming hero, one of his strongest and most sympathetic characters. Carton’s tragedy is a beautiful tragedy.Ⅱ The Reviews from Home