第8講全球化、民族國家與世界法治-文庫吧資料
2025-07-26 05:29本頁面
【正文】 mate nationstates. ? Rationalists see sovereignty similarly to Realists. However, Rationalism states that the sovereignty of a nationstate may be violated in extreme circumstances, such as human rights abuses. ? Internationalists believe that sovereignty is outdated and an unnecessary obstacle to achieving peace, in line with their belief of a 39。盧梭（ 1712年─1778年）對(duì)人民主權(quán)的定義，與博丹主權(quán)概念符合，差異僅在于盧梭認(rèn)為只有 人民 才能正當(dāng)?shù)男惺怪鳈?quán)。 讓 雅克 ? 它也是 永恒的 ，因?yàn)閷?duì)它的擁有者而言，主權(quán)并沒有期限存在（而 掌權(quán)者則有其期限）。 ? 從這里他也先行定義了君權(quán)神授說，指出 “ 主權(quán)是一個(gè)共和國所擁有的絕對(duì)和永恒的權(quán)利 ” 。博丹的絕對(duì)主權(quán) ? 讓 the moral basis of sovereignty ? Here exist vastly differing views on the moral basis of sovereignty. A fundamental polarity is between theories that assert that sovereignty is vested directly in the sovereign by divine right or natural right, and theo
環(huán)評(píng)公示相關(guān)推薦
鄂ICP備17016276號(hào)-1